Background. Patients in hospital discharge planning units are often described as waiting for placement, implying a passivity that is not necessarily part of their experience. The anthropological concept of liminality, which refers to both a state of being and a process during which people are suspended between former and future selves, offers a framework for exploring patients' experiences of a discharge planning unit as a transitional space. Methods. This pilot qualitative study incorporates participant observation and ethnographic interviewing to explore how two patients living in the discharge planning unit of a large urban hospital use weekly bus trips into the community to actively renegotiate their sense of self. Results. An interpretation of the findings using the concepts of emplotment and occupation reveals how patients in a liminal environment work to create meanings through disruptions in their lives. Practice Implications. The renegotiation of identity through occupations highlights the transformative potential of these experiences, suggesting possibilities for occupational therapists to support their clients in that process of change.
BeckerG. (1997). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
CarpenterC., & HammellK. (2000). Evaluating qualitative research. In HammellK. W., CarpenterC., & DyckI. (Eds.), Using qualitative research: A practical introduction for occupational and physical therapists (pp. 107–119). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
3.
CharmazK. (1987). Struggling for a self: Identity levels of the chronically ill. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 6, 283–321.
4.
ClarkJ. A., & MishlerE. G. (1992). Attending to patients' stories: Reframing the clinical task. Sociology of Health and Illness, 14 (3), 344–372.
5.
EmersonR. M., FretzR. I., & ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
GilbrethF., & GilbrethL. (1973). Applied motion study: A collection of papers on the efficient method of industrial preparedness. Easton, NJ: Hive Publishing. (Original work published 1916)
7.
GubriumJ. F., & HolsteinJ. A. (1997). The new language of qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
KaufmanS. R. (1994). In-depth interviewing. In GubriumJ. F. & SankarA. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research (pp. 123–136). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
9.
LawM., CooperB.A., StrongS., StewartD., RigbyP., & LettsL. (1996). The Person-Environment-Occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.
10.
LawM., PolatajkoH., BaptisteS., & TownsendE. (1997). Core concepts of occupational therapy. In Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (pp. 29–56). Ottawa, ON: CAOT publications ACE.
11.
LuborskyM. (1994). The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In GubriumJ. F. & SankarA. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
MattinglyC. (1994). The narrative nature of clinical reasoning. In MattinglyC. & FlemingM.H., Clinical reasoning: Forms of inquiry in a therapeutic practice (pp. 239–269). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
13.
MurphyR. F., ScheerJ., MurphyY., & MackR. (1988). Physical disability and social liminality: A study in the rituals of adversity. Social Sciences and Medicine, 26 (2), 235–242.
14.
PierceD. (2001). Untangling occupation and activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 138–146.
15.
KleinB. Sherr (1997). Slow dance. Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf.
16.
TurnerV. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.
17.
van GennepA. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
