Background. Community mental health care has shifted focus from resettlement to empowerment, reflecting a wider agenda for social inclusion. Purpose. This study evaluated mental health day services from the perspectives of thirty-nine clients. Method. Data analysis of the four focus groups explored the implications for occupational therapy. The data collected were subjected to constant comparative analysis and theoretical sampling. Results. Participants described how mental health day services structured their day and enabled access to support networks. However, many perceived aspects of the services as fostering their dependence and threatening sessions they valued. This dependency led to them feeling alienated and wishing to seek greater influence over decisions about their current and future life. The concept of occupational alienation was used to further interpret their situation. Practice Implications. Occupational therapy could overcome occupational alienation experienced by mental health day service clients, through the development of services within and beyond day services which promote a sense of belonging and offers meaningful occupation.
AllenM. (2000). An underrated service. Community Care, 14 December, 22.
2.
BallN. (2002). DJ workshops and mental health. Occupational Therapy News, November, 33.
3.
BromwichD. (1991). Alienation and belonging to humanity. Social Research, 58, 139–157.
4.
CattyJ.BurnsT. & ComasA. (2002). Day centres for severe mental illness. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue One.
5.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. & LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
6.
ConlonK. (2002). Looking ahead. Occupational Therapy News, October 2002, 28.
7.
CraikC.AustinC.ChacksfieldJ.RichardsG. & SchellD. (1998). College of Occupational Therapists: Position paper on the way ahead for research, education and practice in mental health. British Journal of Occupational Therapy61, 390–393.
8.
Department of Health (1999). National service framework for mental health: Executive Summary. London: The Stationery Office.
FaulknerA. & ThomasP. (2002). User-led research and evidence-based medicine. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, January 2002, 1–3.
11.
FaulknerG. (2002). Walking schemes for mental health service users. Occupational Therapy News, October 2002, 30.
12.
FieldhouseJ. (2000). Occupational science and community mental health: Using occupational risk factors as a framework for exploring chronicity. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 5, 211–7.
13.
FinlayL. (1998). Reflexivity: An essential component for all research?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 10, 453–456.
14.
FirbyP. (1995). Service users' perceptions of a psychiatric day hospital. Health and Social Care, 2, 301–307.
15.
FortuneT. (2000). Occupational therapists: Is our therapy truly occupational or are we merely filling gaps?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 225–230.
16.
FosterA. (1998). Thinking about risk. In FosterA. & RobertsV. (Eds.), Managing mental health in the community. Chaos and containment (pp. 84–94). London: Routledge.
17.
Fowler-DavisS. & HydeP. (2002). Priorities in mental health research: An update. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 8, 387–389.
18.
HollisV.OpenshawS. & GobleR. (2002). Conducting focus groups: Purpose and practicalities. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 1, 2–8.
19.
HusseyD. (2002). Healthy living programme. Occupational Therapy News, October 2002,30.
20.
IsraelJ. (1971). Alienation: From Marx to modern sociology. A macrosociological analysis. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
21.
JordanB. (2001). Tough love: Social work, social exclusion and the third Way. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 527–546.
22.
KruegerR. & CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus Groups (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
23.
LaingR. (1967). The politics of experience. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
24.
Laliberte-RudmanD.YuB.ScottE. & PajouhandehP. (2000). Exploration of the perspectives of persons with schizophrenia regarding quality of life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 137–147.
25.
MarshallM.CrowtherR.Almaraz-SerranoA.M. & TyrerP. (2002). Day hospital versus out-patient care for psychiatric disorders. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue One.
26.
MartinC.de CaesteckerL.HunterR.GilloranA.AllsobrookS. & JonesL. (1999). Developing community mental health services: An evaluation of Glasgow's mental health resource centres. Health and Social Care in the Community, 7, 51–60.
27.
McKayE.BryantW. & CraikC. (2003). I have got a lot of positive things from here… it saved my life. Definitely: Perspectives on mental health day services. Brunel University, UK: Authors.
28.
MeeJ. & SumsionT. (2001). Mental health clients confirm the motivating power of occupation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 121–128.
29.
MorganH. (1998). A potential for partnership? In FosterA. & RobertsV. (Eds.), Managing mental health in the community. Chaos and containment? (pp. 177–187). London: Routledge.
30.
MuijenM. (1993). Mental health services: What works? In WellerM. & MuijenM. (Eds.), Dimensions of community mental health care (pp. 38–61). London: WB Saunders.
31.
NagleS.CookJ. & PolatajkoH. (2002). I'm doing as much as I can: Occupational choices of persons with a severe and persistent mental illness. Journal of Occupational Science, 9 (2) 72–81.
32.
OliverM. (1983). Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
33.
PayneF.SchofieldP. & O'GormanC. (2000). Taking soundings: users' and carers' views of the national service framework for mental health. London: Kings Fund.
34.
PriorL. (1993). The social organisation of mental illness. London: Sage Publications.
35.
RebeiroK. (2001). Enabling occupation: The importance of an affirming environment. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 80–89.
36.
RebeiroK.DayD.SemeniukB.O'BrienM. & WilsonB. (2001). Northern initiative for social action: An occupation-based mental health program. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 493–500.
37.
RepperJ. (2000). Adjusting the focus of mental health nursing: Incorporating service users' experiences of recovery. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 575–87.
38.
RollasonK.StowJ. & PaulJ. (2000). People in the smoke room. Community Care, 14 December 2000, 20–1.
39.
SadloG. (2004). Creativity and occupation. In MolineuxM., (Ed.), Occupation for occupational therapists (pp. 90–100). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
40.
Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. (1997). Pulling Together: The future roles and training of mental health staff. London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
41.
SayceL. (2000). From psychiatric patient to citizen. Overcoming discrimination and social exclusion. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
SimpsonE. & HouseA. (2002). Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 325, 1265, 30 November from http://bmj.com:80/cgi/content/full/325/7375/1265?eaf
44.
SinclairJ. M. (2001). Collins concise dictionary. Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers.
45.
SmithC.PriceP. & AbrahamL. (1997). The difference day-care makes. Nursing Times, December 24, 93, 25–6.
46.
TownsendE. & WilcockA. (2004). Occupational justice. In ChristiansenC. & TownsendE. (Eds.), Introduction to Occupation (pp. 243–273). New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
47.
WilcockA. (1998). An occupational perspective of health. New Jersey: Slack.
48.
World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, World Health Organization.
49.
YurkovichE.SmyerT. & DeanL. (1999). Maintaining health: Proactive client-oriented community day treatment centres for the chronic mentally ill. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 6, 61–69.
