Background. Orthotic intervention (splinting) may have become an end unto itself in the minds of therapists and clients rather than the means to enable optimal occupational performance. Some policy makers and payers seem to hold the belief that orthoses/splints are mere technical aids and as such do not require professional skill and expertise. Narratives. Three client stories demonstrate how iterative collaboration and follow-up help achieve client-identified objectives. Discussion. Client input is an important component of the process and an orthosis must fit into the person's lifestyle, especially if required for long-term use. Six essential considerations when providing orthoses to meet occupational goals are emphasized: client-centredness, comfort, cosmesis, convenience, less is more and follow-up. Use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Model for intervention planning and as an outcome measure is demonstrated. Practice Implications. Orthoses that are thoughtfully designed with client input and carefully constructed can make a difference in a person's life by relieving pain, providing protection and joint stabilization and enabling valued occupations.
AgnewP. & MassF. (1995). Compliance in wearing wrist working splints in rheumatoid arthritis. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 15, 156–180.
2.
BerggrenM.Joost-DavidssonA.LindstrandJ.NylanderG. & PovlsenB. (2001). Reduction in the need for operation after conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint: A seven year prospective study. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstruction and Hand Surgery, 35, 415–417.
3.
BrittonCA (1999). A pilot study exploring families' experience of caring for children with chronic arthritis: Views from the inside. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 534–42.
4.
BrittonC. & MooreA. (2002). How and why families undertake prescribed exercise and splinting programmes and a new model of the families' experience of living with juvenile arthritis. Views from the inside, part 3: British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 453–460
5.
BulthaupS.CiprianiD. & ThomasJ. (1999). An electromyography study of wrist extensor orthoses and upper-extremity function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 434–40.
6.
BuurkeJ.GradyJ.deVriesJ. & BatenC. (1999). Usability of thenar eminence orthoses: Report of a comparative study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 288–294.
7.
CallinanN. & MathiowetzV. (1996). Soft versus hard resting hand splints in rheumatoid arthritis: Pain relief, preference, and compliance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50 (5), 347–353.
8.
CallinanN. (1999). Clinical interpretation of an electromyography study of wrist extension orthoses and upper-extremity function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 441–444.
9.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT), the Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy University Programs (ACOTUP), the Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy Regulatory Organizations (ACOTRO), & the Presidents' Advisory Committee (PAC) (1999). Joint position statement on evidence-based occupational therapy. Retrieved September 1, 2004 from http://www.caot.ca/default.asp?pageid=156
10.
CarlsonJ. & TromblyC. (1983). The effect of wrist immobilization on performance of the Jebsen Hand Function Test. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 167–175.
11.
Case-SmithJ.Outcomes in hand rehabilitation using occupational therapy services. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 499–506.
12.
ColditzJ. (2000). The biomechanics of a thumb carpometacarpal immobilization splint: Design and fitting. Journal of Hand Therapy, 13, 228–35.
13.
FessE. (2002). A history of splinting: to understand the present, view the past. Journal of Hand Therapy, 15, 97–132.
14.
HannahS. & HudakP. (2001). Splinting and radial nerve palsy: A single-subject experiment. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14, 195–201.
15.
JansenC.OlsonS. & HassonS. (1997). The effect of use of a wrist orthosis during functional activities on surface electromyography of the wrist extensors in normal subjects. Journal of Hand Therapy, 10, 283–289.
16.
KesterD. (1966). New product makes splinting easier. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20, 43–44.
17.
KingS.ThomasJ. & RiceM. (2003). The immediate and short-term effects of a wrist extension orthosis on upper-extremity kinematics and range of shoulder motion. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 517–524.
18.
LawM.BaptisteS. & MillsJ. (1995). Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 250–257.
19.
LawM.BaptisteS.CarswellA.McCollM.PolatajkoH. & PollockN. (1998). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (2nd ed.) Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
20.
McKeeP. & MorganL. (1998) Orthotics in rehabilitation: Splinting the hand and body. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
21.
PooleJ. & PellegriniV. (2000). Arthritis of the thumb basal joint complex. Journal of Hand Therapy, 13, 91–107.
22.
SharpD. (1991) The illustrated encyclopedia of architects and architecture. New York: Quatro Publishing.
23.
SternE.YtterbergS.KrugH.MullinG. & MahowaldM. (1996a). Immediate and short-term effects of three commercial wrist extensor orthoses on grip strength and function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research, 9, 42–50.
24.
SternE.YtterbergS.KrugH. & MahowaldM. (1996b). Finger dexterity and hand function: Effect of three commercial wrist extensor orthoses on patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research, 9, 197–205.
25.
SternE.YtterbergLarson L.PortogheseC.KratxW. & MahowaldM. (1997). Commercial wrist orthoses: Patient use and preference. Arthritis Care and Research, 10, 27–34.
26.
SwigartC.EatonR.GlickelS. & JohnsonC. (1999). Splinting in the treatment of arthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. Journal of Hand Surgery, 24, 86–91.
Van LedeP. (2002). Minimalistic splint design: A rationale told in a personal style. Journal of Hand Therapy, 15, 192–201.
30.
WressleE.Eeg-OlofssonA.MarcussonJ. & HenrikssonC. (2002). Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-goal formation structure. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 5–11.
31.
ChanW. Yuen Yee & ChapparoC. (1999). Effect of wrist immobilization on upper limb function of elderly males. Technology and Disability, 11, 39–49.
