Background.The current impact of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) on the field of occupational therapy within Canada is unknown. Purpose.To survey occupational therapists in Canada about their knowledge, use of, and suggestions for education about the ICF. Method.Mixed methods design included (i) an online survey, with data analyzed using quantitative methods; and (ii) semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of 10 therapists, using content analysis. Results.The online survey was completed by 587 occupational therapists (17.6% return). Four hundred and ten respondents (70.0%) indicated some ICF knowledge, and 121 of those individuals (29.5%) reported using it in practice. Interview participants suggested resources, perceived meaning and investment factors impact ICF knowledge. Suggested uses include frameworks and interprofessional collaboration, while ideas for education involve meaningful and accessible formats. Practice Implications.The ICF may be useful to occupational therapists in different settings if it fulfills a meaningful purpose and fits with practice models.
AllanC. M.CampbellW. N.GuptillC. A.StephensonF. F.CampbellD. E. (2006). A conceptual model for interprofessional education: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20, 235–245.
2.
BattagliaM.RussoE.BollaA.ChiussoA.BertelliS.PellegriA. (2004). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in a cohort of children with cognitive, motor, and complex disabilities. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 46, 98–106.
3.
BilbaoA.KennedyC.ChatterjiS.UstunB.BarqueroJ. L. V. VasquezBarthJ. T. (2003). The ICF: Applications of the WHO model of functioning, disability and health to brain injury rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation, 18, 239–250.
4.
BruyèreS. M.Van LooyS. A.PetersonD. B. (2005). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Contemporary literature overview. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 113–121.
5.
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) (2001). Development of mutually exclusive lists for activity and participation: WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Ottawa, ON: Author.
CiezaA.StuckiG. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14, 1225–1237.
8.
FrechtlingJ.SharpL. (Eds.). (1997). User friendly handbook for mixed-method evaluations. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
9.
GibsonL.StrongJ. (2003). A conceptual framework of functional capacity evaluation for occupational therapy in work rehabilitation. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50, 64–71.
10.
HammellK. W. (2006). Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation. Contesting assumptions, challenging practice. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Elsevier Ltd.
11.
HammellK. W. (2004). Deviating from the norm: A skeptical interrogation of the classificatory practices of the ICF. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 408–411.
12.
HeerkensY.EngelsJ.KuiperC.Van der GuldenJ.OostendorpR. (2004). The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26, 1060–1066.
13.
HeerkensY.van der BrugY.ten NapelH.van RavensbergD. (2003). Past and future use of the ICF (former ICIDH) by nursing and allied health professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 620–627,.
14.
HemmingssonH.JonssonH. (2005). An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 569–576.
15.
HockingC.NessN. E. (2004). WFOT minimum standards for the education of occupational therapists: Shaping the profession. WFOT Bulletin, 50, 9–17.
16.
HwangJ. L.NochajskiS.M. (2003). The International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF) and its application with AIDS. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 69, 4–12.
17.
JetteA. M.HaleyS. M.KooyoomjianJ. T. (2003). Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct?Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, 145–149.
18.
KearneyM. (2001). Focus on research methods: Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 145–153.
19.
LeonardiM.BickenbachJ.RaggiA.SalaM.GuzzonP.ValsecchiM. R. (2005). Training on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): The ICF-DIN basic and the ICF-DIN advanced course developed by the disability Italian network. Journal of Headache & Pain, 6, 159–164.
20.
ReedG. M.LuxJ. B.BufkaL. F.TraskC.PetersonD.B.StarkS. (2005). Operationalizing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical settings. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 122–131.
21.
RosenbaumP.StewartD. (2004). The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 11, 5–10.
22.
ShawL.MacKinnonJ. (2004). A multidimensional view of health. Education for Health, 17, 213–222.
23.
StammT. A.CiezaA.MacholdK.SmolenJ. S.StuckiG. (2006). Exploration of the link between conceptual occupational therapy models and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53, 9–17.
24.
StewartD. (2002). The new ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Concepts and implementation issues for occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy Now, 4, 17–21.
25.
StuckiG. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84, 733–740.
26.
StuckiG.EwertT.CiezaA. (2003). Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disability & Rehabilitation, 25, 628–634.
27.
TempestS.McIntyreA. (2006). Using the ICF to clarify team roles and demonstrate clinical reasoning in stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 663–667.
28.
WeberB.YarandiH.RoweM.WeberP. (2005) A comparison study: Paper-based versus web-based data collection and management. Applied Nursing Research, 18, 182–185.
29.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2001). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
