Background. Occupational therapists are change agents who are well equipped to participate in community development. Community development projects can help agencies in many ways, including determining needs, educating stakeholders, developing novel programs, finding and creating resources, marketing the agency, and creating or implementing policy. In order for service agencies to profit, they need an understanding of the skills occupational therapists can offer. The best way to gain that knowledge may be through direct experience. Purpose. This paper describes the benefits that flow to community agency partners and to occupational therapy students from an innovative, integrated fieldwork model that links students with service agencies. Key Issues. This approach has demonstrated many benefits to community partners, while allowing all students in an occupational therapy program to have community development experience. Implications. This is a cost-effective way to demonstrate the value of occupational therapy and to deliver multiple community development projects.
BanksS.CrossmanD.PoelD.StewartM. (1997). Partnerships among health professionals and self-help group members. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 259–269.
2.
BanksS.HeadB. (2004). Partnering occupational therapy and community development. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 5–11.
3.
BellR. A.WarheitG. J.SchwabJ. J. (1977). Needs assessment: A strategy for structuring change. In CourseyR. D.SpecterG. A.MurrellS. A.HuntB. (Eds.), Program evaluation for mental health: Methods, strategies, and participants (pp. 67–76). New York: Grune & Stratton.
4.
BossersA.CookJ.PolatajkoH.LaineC. (1997). Understanding the role-emerging fieldwork placement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 70–81.
5.
BossersA.MillerL. T.PolatajkoH. J.HartleyM. (2007). Competency based fieldwork evaluation for occupational therapists.Scarborough, ON: Nelson Education.
6.
BravemanB.KielhofnerG. (2006). Developing evidence-based occupational therapy programming. In BravemanB., Leading and managing occupational therapy services: An evidence-based approach (pp. 215–244). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
7.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2002). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (2nd ed.). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
8.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2005). CAOT academic accreditation standards and self-study guide. Retrieved September 23, 2008, from http://www.caot.ca/pdfs/GuideComplete.pdf.
9.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2007). Profile of occupational therapy practice in Canada (2007). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
10.
CorcoranK.FisherJ. (1997). Measures for clinical practice.New York: Collier MacMillan.
11.
De MarchiB.CasatiS.TariaoG. (2007). Stakeholder appraisal of policy options for responding to obesity in Italy. Obesity Reviews, 8 (Suppl. 2), 83–89.
12.
FriedlandJ.PolatajkoH.GageM. (2001). Expanding the boundaries of occupational therapy practice through student fieldwork experiences: Description of a provincially-funded community development project. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 301–309.
HockingC.NessN. E. (2002). Revised minimum standards for the education of occupational therapists.Perth, Australia: World Federation of Occupational Therapy.
15.
JaffeE. G.EpsteinC. F. (1992). Occupational therapy consultation: Theory, principles, and practice.St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
16.
KielhofnerG. (2002). A model of human occupation: Theory and application (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
17.
KronenbergF.PollardN. (2005). Introduction: A beginning … In KronenbergF.AlgadoS. S.PollardN. (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 1–13). Edinburgh, England: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
18.
LaucknerH.PentlandW.PatersonM. (2007). Exploring Canadian occupational therapists' understanding of and experiences in community development. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 314–325.
19.
LimK. H.IwamaM. K. (2001). Emerging models — an Asian perspective the Kawa (River) Model. In DuncanE. A. S. (Ed.), Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (4th ed., pp. 161–189). Edinburgh, England: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
20.
MuckianJ. (2007). Influencing policy development: The whirling dervish of the autism in-home program. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 22, 223–230.
21.
PennB.PennJ. (1990). Marketing occupational therapy: Imperative for the future?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 64–66.
22.
PetersenD. J.AlexanderG. R. (2001). Needs assessment in public health: A practical guide for students and professionals.New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
23.
RoyseB. A.ThyerD., (1996). The evaluation of need: Needs assessment. In RoyseD.ThyerB. A. (Eds.). Program evaluation: An introduction (pp. 21–50). Chicago: Nelson Hall.
24.
ScottV.SternR.SandersD.ReagonG.MathewsV. (2008, February 4). Research to action to address inequities: The experience of the Cape Town Equity Guage. International Journal for Equity in Health, 7 (6). Retrieved November 20, 2008, from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/6.
25.
SullivanT. M.FinlaysonM. (2000). Role-emerging fieldwork: The University of Manitoba approach. OT Now, May/June, 13–14 & 24.
26.
TownsendE. A.PolatajkoH. J. (2007). Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation.Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
27.
WilcockA. A. (1998). An occupational perspective of health.Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
28.
YoungstromM. J. (1999). Developing a new occupational therapy program. In JacobsK.LogigianM. K. (Eds.), Functions of a manager in occupational therapy (3rd ed., pp. 135–142). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
