Developing occupational therapy students’ practice habits via qualitative inquiry education

Abstract

French

Background

Accreditation standards and practice competencies underscore the importance of research for occupational therapy practice, but they do not guide how occupational therapy education addresses research. Despite the prominence of qualitative research in the health professions, there exists a need to articulate how and why qualitative inquiry is taught in occupational therapy education.

Purpose

We discuss how qualitative inquiry education can develop habits of reflection and reflexivity, criticality, and active engagement in preparation for occupational therapy practice.

Key Issues

We hold that our students’ professional abilities to practice in a well-reasoned, ethical, and responsive manner are enhanced by experiences with qualitative inquiry and suggest that there is potential in linking qualitative inquiry experiences to professional habit formation in occupational therapy education.

Implications

In addition to teaching research for its own sake, we suggest that educators can adopt a broader view of how qualitative inquiry functions within occupational therapy education.

Keywords

Change agent Education Habits Qualitative research Reflective practice reflexivity agent de changement formation habitudes pratique réflexive réflexivité recherche qualitative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abreu

B. C.

Peloquin

S. M.

Ottenbacher

(1998). Competence in scientific inquiry and research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 751–759. doi:10.5014/ajot.52.9.751

Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education. (2012). Accreditation council for occupational therapy education: Accreditation manual. Retrieved from http://www.aota.org/Educate/Accredit/Policies/47670.aspx?FT=.pdf

Aldrich

R. M.

(2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 147–156. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686624

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2007). Philosophy of occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 678. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.6.678

Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2011). CAOT academic accreditation standards and self-study guide. Retrieved from http://www.caot.ca/acc/Standards%20and%20SSGuide%20Rev%20EN%202010-11.pdf

Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2012). Profile of practice of occupational therapists in Canada 2012. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE. Retrieved from http://www.caot.ca/pdfs/2012otprofile.pdf

Cheek

(2011). Moving on: Researching, surviving, and thriving in the evidence-saturated world of health care. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 696–703. doi:10.1177/1049732310395608

Clark

(2006). One person’s thoughts on the future of occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 167–169. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9726513

Coppard

B. M.

Dickerson

(2007). A descriptive review of occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 672–677. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.6.672

10.

Delany

C. M.

Edwards

Jensen

G. M.

Skinner

(2010). Closing the gap between ethics knowledge and practice through active engagement: An applied model of physical therapy ethics. Physical Therapy, 90, 1068–1078. doi:10.2522/ptj.20090379

11.

Denzin

N. K.

(2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

12.

Dewey

(1929/2005). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation between knowledge and action. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.

13.

Doyle

(2013). Reflexivity and the capacity to think. Qualitative Health Research, 23, 248–255. doi:10.1177/1049732312467854

14.

Eakin

J. M.

Mykhalovskiy

(2005). Teaching against the grain: A workshop on teaching qualitative research in the health sciences. Conference report: A national workshop on teaching qualitative research in the health sciences. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Article 42. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/494/1056

15.

Eisenhart

Jurow

A. S.

(2011). Teaching qualitative research. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 699–714). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Emery

L. J.

Kalscheur

J. A.

(2000). Use of the student-oriented learning outline in research education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 335–338. doi:10.5014/ajot.54.3.335

17.

Finlay

(2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531–545. doi:10.1177/104973202129120052

18.

Finlayson

M. L.

(2013). Muriel Driver Memorial Lecture: Embracing our role as change agents. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80, 205–214. doi:10.1177/0008417413499505

19.

Friedland

(2007). Restoring the spirit: The beginnings of occupational therapy in Canada, 1890–1930. Montréal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

20.

Gair

(2012). Feeling their stories: Contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positionings, and enriching qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 134–143. doi:10.1177/1049732311420580

21.

Glover

J. S.

(2009). The literature of occupational science: A systematic, quantitative examination of peer-reviewed publications from 1996–2006. Journal of Occupational Science, 16, 92–103. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686648

22.

Goussinsky

Reshef

Yanay-Ventura

Yassour-Borochowitz

(2011). Qualitative research for human services students: A three-phase model. Qualitative Report, 16(1), 126–146. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR16-1/yassour-borochowitz.pdf

23.

Gupta

Upshur

(2012). Critical thinking in clinical medicine: What is it? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 938–944. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01897.x

24.

Holloway

Biley

F. C.

(2011). Being a qualitative researcher. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 968–975. doi:10.1177/1049732310395607

25.

Hooper

King

Wood

Bilics

Gupta

(2013). An international systematic mapping review of educational approaches and teaching methods in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 9–22. doi:10.4276/030802213X13576469254612

26.

Hurworth

R. E.

(2008). Teaching qualitative research: Cases and issues. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.

27.

Janesick

V. J.

(2011). Stretching exercises for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

28.

Kinsella

E. A.

(2010). Professional knowledge and the epistemology of reflective practice. Nursing Philosophy, 11 (1), 3–14. doi:10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00428.x

29.

Krefting

(1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222. doi:10.5014/ajot.45.3.214

30.

Leavy

(2012). Transdisciplinarity and training the next generation of researchers: Problem-centered approaches to research and problem-based learning. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5 (2), 204–224.

31.

Lipp

(2007). Developing the reflexive dimension of reflection: A framework for debate. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 1, 18–26. doi:10.5172/mra.455.1.1.18

32.

Loughlin

Bluhm

Buetow

Upshur

R. E. G.

Goldenberg

Borgerson

… Kingma

(2012). Reason and value: Making reasoning fit for practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18, 929–937. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01896.x

33.

Mann

Gordon

MacLeod

(2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 14, 595–621. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2

34.

Molke

D. L.

Laliberte Rudman

Polatajko

H. J.

(2004). The promise of occupational science: A developmental assessment of an emerging academic discipline. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 269–281. doi:10.1177/000841740407100505

35.

Morse

J. M.

(2012). Qualitative health research: Creating a new discipline. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

36.

Morse

J. M.

(2006). The politics of evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 295–404. doi:10.1177/1049732305285482

37.

Polkinghorne

D. E.

(2004). Practice and the human sciences: The case for a judgment-based practice of care. New York, NY: SUNY Press.

38.

Polkinghorne

D. E.

(2006). An agenda for the second generation of qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 1, 68–77.

39.

Royeen

C. B.

(1995). A problem-based learning curriculum for occupational therapy education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 338–346. doi:10.5014/ajot.49.4.338

40.

Schön

(1983). The reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

41.

Schön

(1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

42.

Shulman

L. S.

(2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. Retrieved from http://cpedinitiative.org/files/Signature%20Pedagogies%20of%20the%20Profession_Shulman%20%282005%29.pdf

43.

Taylor

(2006). Reflective practice: A guide for nurses and midwives (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

44.

Tomlin

Borgetto

(2011). Research pyramid: A new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 189–196. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.000828

45.

Waite

(2014). Teaching the unteachable: Some issues of qualitative research pedagogy. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 267–281. doi:10.1177/1077800413489532