Investigating visual attention during scene perception of safe and unsafe occupational performance

Abstract

French

Background.

Occupational therapists routinely use observation for evaluation, intervention planning, and prediction of a client’s occupational performance and/or safety within the environment. Perception of safety contributes to the decision-making process for discharge or placement recommendations.

Purpose.

The purpose of this study was to determine if differences exist in safety ratings and eye movements between occupational therapists and nontrained matched individuals while viewing domain-specific versus non-domain-specific images.

Method.

Ten licensed occupational therapists and 10 age-, gender-, and education level–matched participants completed this eye-tracking study.

Findings.

For all image exposure durations, occupational therapists had more polarized safety ratings for stroke-related image content but little evidence of differences in eye movements between groups. Eye movement group differences did not emerge in the regions of interest identified by an independent expert panel.

Implications.

The results point to a complex relationship between decision making and observational behaviour in occupational assessment and highlight the need to look beyond image features.

Keywords

Activities of Daily Living Attention Eye movement Occupational therapy Visual perception Activités de la vie quotidienne attention ergothérapie mouvement des yeux perception visuelle

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berbaum

K. S.

Brandser

E. A.

Franken

E. A.

Dorfman

D. D.

Caldwell

R. T.

Krupinski

E. A.

(2001). Gaze dwell times on acute trauma injuries missed because of satisfaction of search. Academic Radiology, 8, 304–314. doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80499-3

Bottari

C. L.

Dassa

Rainville

C. M.

Dutil

É.

(2010). The IADL Profile: Development, content validity, intra- and interrater agreement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 90–100. doi:10.2182/cjot.2010.77.2.5

Brentnall

Bundy

A. C.

(2009). The concept of reliability in the context of observational assessments. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 29, 63–71. doi:10.3928/15394492-20090301-01

Castelhano

M. S.

Henderson

J. M.

(2008). The influence of color on the perception of scene gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 660–675. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.660

Duchowski

A. T.

(2007). Eye tracking methodology (2nd ed.). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.

Gegenfurtner

Lehtinen

Saljo

(2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 523–552. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7

Henderson

J. M.

Brockmole

J. R.

Castelhano

M. S.

Mack

M. L.

(2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during search in real-world scenes. In van Gompel

R. P. G.

Fischer

M. H.

Murray

W. S.

Hill

R. L.

(Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Henderson

J. M.

Malcolm

G. L.

Schandl

(2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance versus visual salience during search for non-salient objects in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 850–856. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.850

Kundel

H. L.

Nodine

C. F.

Krupinski

E. A.

Mello-Thoms

(2008). Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Academic Radiology, 15, 881–886. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.023

10.

Law

Cooper

Strong

Stewart

Rigby

Letts

(1996). The Person-Environment-Occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23. doi:10.1177/000841749606300103

11.

Lindsay

M. P.

Gubitz

Bayley

Hill

M. D.

Davies-Schinkel

Singh

Phillips

(2010). Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Stroke Network. Retrieved from http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2010BPR_ENG.pdf

12.

MacKenzie

D. E.

Westwood

D. A.

(2013a). Observation patterns of dynamic occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80, 92–100. doi:10.1177/0008417413484885

13.

MacKenzie

D. E.

Westwood

D. A.

(2013b). Occupational therapists and observation: What are you looking at? OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 33, 4–11. doi:10.3928/15394492-20120928-01

14.

Malcolm

G. L.

Henderson

J. M.

(2010). Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real world scene search. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–11. doi:10.1167/10.2.4.

15.

Merritt

B. K.

(2011). Validity of using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills to determine the need for assistance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 643–650. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.000547

16.

Oliva

Torralba

(2006). Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 23–36. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55002-2

17.

Orquin

J. L.

Loose

S. M.

(2013). Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision-making. Acta Psychologica, 144, 190–206. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003

18.

Rayner

Smith

T. J.

Malcolm

G. L.

Henderson

J. M.

(2009). Eye movements and visual encoding during scene perception. Psychological Science, 20, 6–10. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02243.x

19.

Russell

Fitzgerald

M. H.

Williamson

Manor

Whybrow

(2002). Independence as a practice issue in occupational therapy: The safety clause. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 369–379. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.4.369

20.

SPSS Inc. (2009). PASW Statistics 17.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Author.

21.

SR Research Ltd. (n.d.). Experiment Builder (Version 1.1.1.1 RC). Retrieved June 22, 2008, from http://www.sr-research.com/eb.html

22.

Stevens

Winskel

Studies

Howell

Vidal

L.-M.

Latimer

Milne-Home

(2010). Perceiving dance: Schematic expectations guide experts’ scanning of contemporary dance film. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 14, 19–25.

23.

Tatler

B. W.

Baddeley

R. J.

Gilchrist

I. D.

(2005). Visual correlates of fixation selection: Effects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45, 643–659. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.017

24.

Tatler

B. W.

Hayhoe

M. M.

Land

M. F.

Ballard

D. H.

(2011). Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–23. doi:10.1167/11.5.5

25.

Theeuwes

(2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006

26.

Torralba

Oliva

Castelhano

M. S.

Henderson

J. M.

(2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766–786. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766