Functional electrical stimulation therapy for severe hemiplegia: Randomized control trial revisited

Abstract

French

Background.

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability. Stroke survivors seldom improve their upper-limb function when their deficit is severe, despite recently developed therapies.

Purpose.

This study aims to assess the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation therapy in improving voluntary reaching and grasping after severe hemiplegia.

Method.

A post hoc analysis of a previously completed randomized control trial (clinicaltrials.gov, No. NCT00221078) was carried out involving 21 participants with severe upper-limb hemiplegia (i.e., Fugl-Meyer Assessment–Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] ≤ 15) resulting from stroke.

Findings.

Functional Independence Measure Self-Care subscores increased 22.8 (±6.7) points in the intervention group and 9 (±6.5) in the control group, following 40 hr of equal-intensity therapy. FMA-UE score changes were 27.2 (±13.5) and 5.3 (±11.0) for the intervention and control groups, respectively.

Implications.

The results may represent the largest upper-limb function improvements in any stroke population to date, especially in those with severe upper-limb deficit.

Keywords

Activities of daily living Rehabilitation Recovery of function Stroke Upper limb

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arya

K. N.

Verma

Garg

R. K.

(2011). Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18, 599–610. doi:10.1310/tsr18s01-599

Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research. (2010). Rehabilitation measures database. Retrieved from http://www.rehabmeasures.org

Cheeran

Cohen

Dobkin

Ford

Greenwood

Howard

… Wolf

(2009). The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: Driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 97–107. doi:10.1177/1545968308326636

Cirstea

C. M.

Ptito

Levin

M. F.

(2006). Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke, 37, 1237–1242. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000217417.89347.63

Craven

B. C.

Hadi

S. C.

Popovic

M. R.

(2015). Functional electrical stimulation therapy: Enabling function through reaching and grasping. In Soderback

(Ed.), International handbook of occupational therapy interventions (2nd ed., pp. 587–606). New York, NY: Springer.

Daly

J. J.

Wolpaw

J. R.

(2008). Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurology, 7, 1032–1043. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0

Dobkin

B. H.

(2004). Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurology, 3, 528–536. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00851-8

Dodds

T. A.

Martin

D. P.

Stolov

W. C.

Deyo

R. A.

(1993). A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 531–536. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-U

Duncan

P. W.

Propst

Nelson

S. G.

(1983). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Physical Therapy, 63(10), 1606–1610.

10.

Foley

Mehta

Jutai

Staines

Teasell

(2013). Upper extremity interventions. In Teasell

(Ed.), Evidence review (16th ed., chap. 10). Retrieved from Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation website: http://www.ebrsr.com/evidence-review/10-upper-extremity-interventions

11.

Fugl-Meyer

A. R.

Jääskö

Leyman

Olson

Setglind

(1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(1), 13–31.

12.

Gladstone

D. J.

Danells

C. J.

Black

S. E.

(2002). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16, 232–240. doi:10.1177/154596802401105171

13.

Glanz

Klawansky

Stason

Berkey

Chalmers

T. C.

(1996). Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 549–553. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90293-2

14.

Gowland

Stratford

Ward

Moreland

Torresin

Van Hullenaar

… Plews

(1993). Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke, 24(1), 58–63. doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.1.58

15.

Johansen

H. L.

Wielgosz

A. T.

Nguyen

Fry

R. N.

(2006). Incidence, comorbidity, case fatality and readmission of hospitalized stroke patients in Canada. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 22(1), 65–71. doi:10.1016/S0828-282X(06)70242-2

16.

Kwakkel

Kollen

B. J.

Krebs

H. I.

(2008). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 111–121. doi:10.1177/1545968307305457

17.

Kwon

Hartzema

A. G.

Duncan

P. W.

Min-Lai

(2004). Disability measures in stroke: Relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke, 35, 918–923. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000119385.56094.32

18.

Lang

C. E.

Edwards

D. F.

Birkenmeier

R. L.

Dromerick

A. W.

(2008). Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 1693–1700. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022

19.

Oczkowski

W. J.

Barreca

(1993). The Functional Independence Measure: Its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 1291–1294. doi:10.1016/0003-9993(93)90081-K

20.

Page

S. J.

Fulk

G. D.

Boyne

(2012). Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Physical Therapy, 92, 791–798. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110009

21.

Platz

Pinkowski

van Wijck

Kim

I.-H.

di Bella

Johnson

(2005). Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicentre study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19, 404–411. doi:10.1191/0269215505cr832oa

22.

Popovic

M. B.

Popovic

D. B.

Sinkjaer

Stefanovic

Schwirtlich

(2002). Restitution of reaching and grasping promoted by functional electrical therapy. Artificial Organs, 26, 271–275. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06950.x

23.

Popovic

M. R.

Keller

(2005). Modular transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation system. Medical Engineering & Physics, 27, 81–92. doi :10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.08.016

24.

Popovic

M. R.

Thrasher

T. A.

Zivanovic

Takaki

Hajek

(2005). Neuroprosthesis for retraining reaching and grasping functions in severe hemiplegic patients. Neuromodulation: Journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 8(1), 58–72. doi:10.1111/j.1094-7159.2005.05221.x

25.

Prabhakaran

Zarahn

Riley

Speizer

Chong

J. Y.

Lazar

R. M.

… Krakauer

J. W.

(2007). Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 64–71. doi:10.1177/1545968307305302

26.

Ramos Murguialday

Broetz

Rea

Läer

Yilmaz

Ö.

Brasil

F. L.

… Vyziotis

(2013). Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study. Annals of Neurology, 74(1), 100–108. doi:10.1002/ana.23879

27.

Rushton

D. N.

(2003). Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation: An hypothesis. Medical Engineering & Physics, 25(1), 75–78. doi:10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00040-1

28.

See

Dodakian

Chou

Chan

McKenzie

Reinkensmeyer

D. J.

Cramer

S. C.

(2013). A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27, 732–741. doi:10.1177/1545968313491000

29.

Soderback

(Ed.). (2015). International handbook of occupational therapy interventions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

30.

Teasell

Richardson

Allen

Hussein

(2015). Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Retrieved from http://www.ebrsr.com/

31.

Thrasher

T. A.

Zivanovic

McIlroy

Popovic

M. R.

(2008). Rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function in severe hemiplegic patients using functional electrical stimulation therapy. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 706–714. doi:10.1177/1545968308317436

32.

Wolf

S. L.

Winstein

C. J.

Miller

J. P.

Taub

Uswatte

Morris

,…EXCITE Investigators. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 2095–2104. doi:10.1001/jama.296.17.2095

33.

Woodbury

M. L.

Velozo

C. A.

Richards

L. G.

Duncan

P. W.

Studenski

Lai

S.-M.

(2007). Dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 715–723. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.036

34.

Woodbury

M. L.

Velozo

C. A.

Richards

L. G.

Duncan

P. W.

Studenski

Lai

S.-M.

(2008). Longitudinal stability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 1563–1569. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.041