BavdekarS. B. (2012). Authorship issues. Lung India, 29(1), 76–80. doi:10.4103/09702113.92371
2.
BennettD. M.et TaylorD. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15, 263–270.
3.
BourbonnièreM. C.RussellD. J.et GoldsmithC. H. (2006). Authorship issues: One research center’s experience with developing author guidelines. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 111–119. doi:10.5014/ajot.60.1.111
DavisJ. A.et PolatajkoH. J. (2015). Rendre à César ce qui appartient à César: Notre engagement à respecter l’éthique en matière de publication scientifique. Revue canadienne d’ergothérapie, 82, 82–84. doi:10.1177/0008417415578119
6.
FineM. A.et KurdekL. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48, 1141–1147.
NewmanA.et JonesR. (2006). Authorship of research papers: Ethical and professional issues for short-term researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 420–423. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.012757
9.
SmithE.et Williams-JonesB. (2012). Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 199–212. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5
10.
WagerE. (2009). Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas, 62(2), 109–112. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.001.
11.
WaltmanL. (2012). An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship publishing. Journal of Informetrics, 6, 700–711. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008