We describe the gap between parents’ special education needs and pediatric primary care providers’ (PCPs) ability to address those needs from a mixed-methods study at a safety-net hospital. We conducted qualitative interviews with English- and Spanish-speaking parents (n = 25) and PCPs (n = 11) about special education knowledge and experience and interactions with a primary care–embedded special education clinic. PCPs also answered survey questions on these topics. Parents reported four challenges: (1) knowing where to start and how to advocate for their youth, (2) being heard or having a say, (3) using the “right” language, and (4) gathering information on special education resources. Primary care providers disclosed three barriers: (1) training, (2) knowledge to assess the appropriateness of supports, and (3) time to address concerns. The gap between PCPs and parents was bridged by the special education clinic. Systematic interventions can ensure that PCPs help parents address the special education needs of their patients.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. Number and percentage of public school students with disabilities served under IDEA overall and by race/ethnicity, and those who are English language learners, by state: school year 2017-18. Civil Rights Data Collection, 2017-18. Published 2022. Accessed March 5, 2022. https://ocrdata.ed.gov/assets/downloads/2017-2018/Student-Enrollment/All-Enrollment/Enrollment-IDEA.xlsx.
2.
National Center for Education Statistics. Table 204.30. Children 3 to 21 years old served under individuals with diasbilities education act (IDEA), part B, by type of disability, selected years, 1976-77 through 2020-21. Digest of Education Statistics. Published 2022. Accessed March 5, 2022. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_204.30.asp?current=yes.
3.
LipkinPHOkamotoJ; Council on Children with Disabilities, Council on School Health. The individuals with disabilities education act (IDEA) for children with special educational needs. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):e1650-e1662.
4.
Massachusetts Department of Education. IEP Process Guide. Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education; 2001.
5.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in pediatrics, 2020.
6.
ShahRPKunnavakkamRMsallME.Pediatricians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns regarding special education and individualized education programs. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(5):430-435.
7.
HastingsEALumengJCClarkSJ.Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and confidence in their referrals for special education services in 3- to 5-year-old children. Clin Pediatr. 2014;53(2):166-172.
8.
SheppardMEVitalone-RaccaroN.How physicians support children with disabilities and their families: roles, responsibilities and collaborative partnerships. Disabil Health J. 2016;9(4):692-704.
9.
ZagonaALMillerALKurthJA, et al. Parent perspectives on special education services: how do schools implement team decisions?Sch Commun J. 2019;29(2):105-128.
10.
KervickC.Parents are the experts: understanding parent knowledge and the strategies they use to foster collaboration with special education teams. J Am Acad Special Edu Prof. 2017;12:62-82.
11.
SteeleySLLukacsK.Cultural and linguistic diversity and special education: a case study of one mother’s experiences. Int J Spec Educ. 2015;30(2):20-31.
12.
Larriba-QuestKByiersBJBeisangAMerblerAMSymonsFJ.Special education supports and services for rett syndrome: parent perceptions and satisfaction. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020;58(1):49-64.
13.
RossettiZBurkeMMHughesO, et al. Parent perceptions of the advocacy expectation in special education. Except Child. 2021;87:438-457.
14.
BurkeMMHodappRM.The nature, correlates, and conditions of parental advocacy in special education. Exceptionality. 2016;24:137-150.
15.
Cioè-PeñaM.Planning inclusion: the need to formalize parental participation in individual education plans (and meetings). Educ Forum. 2020;84:377-390.
16.
RiosKAleman-TovarJBurkeMM.Special education experiences and stress among Latina mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2020;73:101534.
17.
StanleySLG. The advocacy efforts of African American Mothers of children with disabilities in rural special education: considerations for school professionals. Rural Spec Educ Q. 2015;34:3-17.
18.
RossettiZRedashASauerJS, et al. Access, accountability, and advocacy: culturally and linguistically diverse families’ participation in IEP meetings. Exceptionality. 2020;28:243-258.
19.
BurkeMMRiosKGarciaM, et al. Examining differences in empowerment, special education knowledge, and family–school partnerships among Latino and White families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Dev Disabil. 2020;66:75-81.
20.
OlivosEMGallagherRJAguilarJ.Fostering collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families of children with moderate to severe disabilities. J Educ Psychol Consult. 2010;20:28-40.
21.
HarryB.An ethnographic study of cross-cultural communication with Puerto Rican-American families in the special education system. Am Educ Res J. 2016;29:471-494.
22.
AngellMEStonerJBSheldenDL.Trust in education professionals. Remedial Spec Educ. 2008;30:160-176.
23.
AdolpheSFernandez-PastranaIScottHOkaforIStranskyML.EASE-ing the way for pediatric providers and parents: the engagement and access to special education (EASE) clinic. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(4):705-707.
24.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeRPayneJGonzalezNCondeJG.Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381.
25.
Boston Medical Center. Find a doctor. Boston Medical Center. Published 2022. Accessed May 2, 2022. https://www.bmc.org/find-doctor.
26.
BurkeMMGoldmanSEHartMS, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of a special education advocacy training program. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2016;13:269-276.
OlsonJDMcAllisterCGrinnellLD, et al. Applying constant comparative method with multiple investigators and inter-coder reliability. Qual Rep. 2016;21:26-42.
29.
The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine Division. Implementing High-quality Primary Care: Rebuilding the Foundation of Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2021. doi:10.17226/25983.
30.
BodenheimerTSinskyC.From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573-576.
31.
The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Taking Action against Clinician Burnout: A Systems Approach to Professional Well-Being. Washington, DC:National Academies Press; 2019. doi:10.17226/25521.
