This report compares the clinical picture, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of children with lead poisoning in the 1950s1 and the 1970s. During this 20-year period, increasing attention has been given to lead poisoning both at the local and national level. This attention has produced legislation to fund screening programs and to reduce the allowable amount of lead in paint. Greater public awareness, more effective methods for screening both populations and en vironments, and a reduction in severe sequelae of lead poisoning have also been achieved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cohen GJ, Ahrens WE: Chronic lead poisoning. J Pediatr54:271, 1959
2.
Center for Disease Control: Increased Lead Absorption and Lead Poisoning in Young Children, March, 1975
3.
Rubin M., Rapaport M.: Lead.Poisoning, a clinical and experimental study of the factors influencing the seasonal incidence in children. Am Dis Child61:245, 1941
4.
Lin-FuJS: Vulnerability of children to lead exposure and toxicity. N Engl Med289:1229, 1973
5.
Chisolm JJ, Harrison HE: The exposure of children to lead. Pediatrics18:943, 1956
6.
Perlstein MA , Attala R.: Neurologic sequelae of plumbism in children . Clin Pediatr5:292, 1966
7.
Piomelli S., Seamon C., Zullow D., et al: Metabolic evidence of lead toxicity in "normal" urban children . Clin Res25:459A, 1977
8.
Center for Disease Control: Preventing Lead Poisoning in Young Children, April, 1978
9.
Hicks JM, Gutierrez AN, Worthy BE: Evaluation of the Delves micro system for blood lead analysis. Clin Chem19:322, 1973
10.
Chisolm JJ, Mellits ED, Keil JE, et al: A simple proto-porphyrin assay-microhematocrit procedure as a screening technique for increased lead absorption in young children. J Pediatr84:490, 1974
11.
Sachs HK, Blanksma LA, Murray EF, et al: Ambulatory treatment of lead poisoning. Pediatrics46: 389, 1970