This article explores the relative influence of policy sectors, political institutions, and urban contexts on the operation of contemporary governance. The research compared the membership, structure, governing capacity, and change of local economic development and secondary education policy networks in four cities: Lille and Rennes in France and Leeds and Southampton in the United Kingdom. The main finding is that the type of policy sector mediates the impact of political institutions. There are strong differences between French and British education policy networks but similarities between the economic policy networks. There is variation by city in economic development networks but much less in secondary education. The implication of the findings is that some sectors, such as economic development, tend to be similar across nation-states and permit subnational variation, whereas others retain strong country differences and maintain intrastate uniformity, a finding that is consistent with the longevity of state traditions. In the transition from government to governance, institutional, sectoral, and urban processes become contingent on each other and on their contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambler, J. (1985). Neo-corporatism and the politics of French education. West European Politics, 8(3), 23-42.
2.
Ashford, D. (1982). British dogmatism and French pragmatism: Central-local policymaking in the welfare state. London: Allen and Unwin.
3.
Browne, W. , & Paik, W. (1993). Beyond the domain: Recasting network politics in the postreform Congress. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1054-1078.
4.
Bulpitt, J. (1983). Territory and power in the United Kingdom. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
5.
Campbell, M. (1990). Local economic policy. London: Cassell.
6.
Cole, A. (1997). Governing the academies: Sub-central education policy-making in France. West European Politics, 20(2), 137-156.
7.
Cole, A. , & John, P. (1995). Local policy networks in France and Britain: Policy coordination in fragmented political sub-systems. West European Politics, 18(4), 89-109.
8.
Cole, A. , & John, P. (1999). Urban governance in Britain and France. London: University College of London Press.
9.
Crozier, M. , & Thoenig, J. -C. (1975). La régulation des systèmes organisées complexes [The regulation of complex organizational systems]. Revue française de Sociologie, 16(1), 3-32.
10.
Dowding, K. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43, 136-158.
11.
Dunleavy, P. (1980). Urban political analysis. London: Macmillan.
12.
Evans, P. , Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Feick, J. (1992). Comparing comparative policy studies: A path towards integration?Journal of Public Policy, 12, 257-285.
14.
Freeman, G. (1985). National styles and policy variation: Explaining structured variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5, 467-496.
15.
Gerbaux, F. , & Muller, P. (1992). Les interventions économiques locales [Local economic policies]. Pouvoirs, 60, 99-114.
16.
Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148-170.
17.
Harloe, M. , Pickvance, C., & Urry, J. (1990). Place, policy and politics. London: Hyman.
18.
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87-124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
19.
Hirst, P. , & Thompson, G. (1996). Globalisation in question. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
20.
Immergut, E. (1992). The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland and Sweden. In S. Steinmo, S. K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics (pp. 57-89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Jessop, B. (1995). Towards a Schumpetarian workfare regime in Britain—reflections on regulation, governance and welfare state. Environment and Planning A, 10, 1613-1626.
22.
John, P. (1994). Central-local relations in the 1980s and 1990s: Toward a policy learning approach. Local Government Studies, 20(3), 412-436.
23.
John, P. (1998). Urban economic policy networks in Britain and France: A sociometric approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 16, 307-322.
24.
John, P. , & Cole, A. (1998a). Sociometric mapping techniques and the comparison of policy networks: Economic decision-making in Leeds and Lille. In D. Marsh (Ed.), Comparing policy networks. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
25.
John, P. , & Cole, A. (1998b). Urban regimes and local governance in Britain and France: Policy adaptation and coordination in Leeds and Lille. Urban Affairs Review, 33, 382-404.
26.
Jordan, G. (1990). Sub-governments, policy communities and networks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 319-338.
27.
Lagroye, J. , & Wright, V. (Eds.). (1979). Local government in Britain and France. London: Allen and Unwin.
28.
Lash, S. , & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London: Sage Ltd.
29.
Le Galès, P. (1993). Politique urbaine et développement local [Urban politics and local development]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
30.
Le Galès, P. , & Mawson, J. (1994). Management innovations in urban policy: Lessons from France. Luton, France: Local Government Management Board.
31.
Lowi, T. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677-715.
32.
Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298-310.
33.
Mabileau, A. (1991). Le système local en France [The local system in France]. Paris: Montchrestien.
34.
Marsh, D. , & Rhodes, R. (Eds.). (1992). Policy networks in British government. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
35.
Mazzeo, C. (1997, August 29-31). From policy change to institutional change: Persistence change and policy frameworks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
36.
Muller, P. (1992). Entre le local et l'Europe: la Crise du modèle français des politiques publics [Between locality and Europe: The crisis of the French model of public policy]. Revue Française de Science Politique, 42(2), 275-297.
37.
Peters, B. G. , Doughtie, J., & McCulloch, M. (1977). Types of democratic systems and types of public policy. Comparative Politics, 9, 327-355.
38.
Przeworski, A. , & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
39.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1986). The national world of local government. London: Allen and Unwin.
40.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1988). Beyond Westminster and Whitehall. London: Unwin Hyman.
41.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1990). Policy networks: A British perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(2), 293-317.
42.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
43.
Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-orientated learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129-168.
44.
Sabatier, P. , & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45.
Schmidt, V. (1990). Democratising France. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Smith, M. (1990). The politics of agricultural support in Britain. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
47.
Steinmo, S. (1989). Political institutions and tax policy in the United States, Sweden and Britain. World Politics, 41, 500-535.
48.
Steinmo, S. (1993). Taxation and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
Steinmo, S. , Thelen, S. K., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Stewart, J. , & Stoker, G. (Eds.). (1989). The future of local government. London: Macmillan.
51.
Wright, V. (1995). Reshaping the state: The implications for public administration. West European Politics, 17, 102-137.
52.
Wright, V. (1996). Public administration in post-war Britain and France: Fundamental similarities masking basic differences. Unpublished manuscript.
