There have been widely differing claims about how environmental groups attempt to reform environmental policy—from those who see the movement as challenging the prevailing social paradigm through confrontation and violence, to those who lament the movement's reliance on conventional styles of political persuasion. This article uses data from the 1998 Global Environmental Organizations Survey (GEOS) to map the political activities used by environmental groups across the globe and to determine what best accounts for these patterns of action. The authors examine the responses of 248 environmental groups in the GEOS; these data allow the authors to compare environmental group behaviors across 59 nations and 5 continents. They find that most environmental groups engage in a mixture of political methods and activities. Although there is little evidence that institutional structures influence participation, the mix of organizational resources and ideology are potent influences on participation patterns. The results help to explain the role that environmental groups play in contemporary politics and the factors that affect this role.
Almeida, P. , & Stearns, L. (1998). Political opportunities and local grassroots environmental movements: The case of minamata. Social Problems, 45, 37-60.
2.
Boudreau, V. (1996). Northern theory, southern protest: Opportunity structure analysis in cross-national perspective. Mobilization, 1, 175-189.
3.
Brackley, P. (1990). World guide to environmental issues and organizations. Essex, UK: Longman.
4.
Brockett, C. (1991). The structure of political opportunities and peasant mobilization in Central America. Comparative Politics, 23, 253-274.
5.
Brulle, R. (1996). Environmental discourse and social movement organizations. Sociological Inquiry, 66, 58-83.
6.
Dalton, R. J. (1994). The green rainbow: Environmental interest groups in Western Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Dalton, R. J. , & Rohrschneider, R. (2002). Political action and the political context: A multilevel model of environmental activism. In D. Fuchset al. (Eds.), Citizen and democracy in East and West: Studies in political culture and political process. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
8.
DeBardeleben, J. , & Hannigan, J. (Eds.). (1995). Environmental security and quality after communism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
della Porta, D. , & Rucht, D. (1995). Left-libertarian movements in context. In J. C. Jenkins & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The politics of social protest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
Deziran, M. , & Bailey, L. (1993). A directory of European environmental organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
11.
Diani, M. (1995). Green networks: A structural analysis of the Italian environmental movement. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh Press.
12.
Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
13.
Gardner, S. (1995, fall). Major themes in the study of grassroots environmentalism in developing countries. Journal of Third World Studies, 12, 200-245.
14.
Gelb, J. (1989). Feminism and politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Jaggers, K. , & Gurr, T. R. (1995). Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research, 32, 469-482.
16.
Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527-553.
17.
Jenkins, J. C. , & Klandermans, B. (Eds.). (1995). The politics of social protest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
Katz, L. , Orrick, S., & Honing, R. (1993). Environmental profiles. New York: Garland.
19.
Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest, British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57-95.
20.
Kriesi, H. (1995). The political opportunity structures and social movement action. In J. C. Jenkins & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The politics of social protest. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
Lee, Y. , & So, A. Y. (Eds.). (1999). Asia's environmental movements. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
22.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review, 62, 114-158.
24.
Livenash, R. (1992, June). The growing influence of NGOs in the developing world. Environment, 34, 12-43.
25.
Lowe, P. , & Goyder, J. (1983). Environmental groups in politics. London: Allen and Unwin.
26.
McAdam, D. (1997). Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. In D. McAdam & D. Snow (Eds.), Social movements: Readings on their emergence, mobilization and dynamics. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
27.
McAdam, D. , McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
McCarthy, J. , & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
29.
Meyer, D. (2002). Opportunities and identities: Bridge-building in the study of social movements. In D. Meyer, N. Whittier, & B. Robnett (Eds.), Social movements: Identity, culture and the state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
Milbrath, L. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a new society. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
Milofsky, C. (Ed.). (1988). Community organizations: Studies in resource mobilization and exchange. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Oberschall, A. (1993). Social movements: Ideologies, interests, and identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
33.
Pierce, J. , Steger, M., Steel, B., & Lovrich, N. (1992). Citizens, political communication, and interest groups: Environmental organizations in Canada and the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger.
34.
Piven, F. , & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people's movement: How they succeed, why they fail.New York: Vintage.
35.
Rochon, T. (1988). Mobilizing for peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Rohrschneider, R. , & Dalton, R. J. (2002). A global network? Transnational cooperation by environmental groups. Journal of Politics, 64, 510-533.
37.
Rootes, C. (Ed.). (1999). Environmental Movement special issue of Environmental Politics, 8.
38.
Rucht, D. (1990). Campaigns, skirmishes and battles: Anti-nuclear movements in the USA, France and West Germany. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4, 193-222.
39.
Rucht, D. (1996). The impact of national contexts on movement structures: A cross-movement and cross-national comparison. In D. McAdam, J. McCarthy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Ruffin, M. H. , McCarter, J., & Upjohn, R. (1996). The post-Soviet handbook: A guide to grass- roots organizations and Internet resources in the newly independent states. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
41.
Schlozman, K. , & Tierney, J. (1986). Organizing interests and American democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
42.
Shaiko, R. (1999). Voices and echoes for the environment: Public interest representation in the 1990s and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
43.
Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45.
Trzyna, T. C. , Margold, E., & Osborn, J. K. (1996). World directory of environmental organizations (5th ed.). Claremont: California Institute of Public Affairs.
46.
Van der Heijden, H. (1997, winter). Political opportunity structure and the institutionalization of the environmental movement. Environmental Politics, 6, 25-50.
47.
Walker, J. (1991). Mobilizing interest groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
48.
Zald, M. (2000). Ideologically structured action: An enlarged agenda for social movement research. Mobilization, 5, 1-16.
49.
Zald, M. , & McCarthy, J. (Eds.). (1987). Social movements in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
50.
World Bank . (1998).World Development Report 1998. Washington, DC: Author.
