Denmark's income tax burden as the percentage of GDP is larger than the total tax burden of the United States, and it has increased further after 1980. How can this be explained, given increasing tax competition and widespread views that strong reliance on regressive taxes was conducive to building and maintaining large tax and welfare states? The article highlights three factors: First, large income taxes are feasible if the capital tax burden is moderated within the income tax. Second, the effective capital income tax burden that had developed up to the early 1980s was extremely low so that subsequent tax reforms could cut marginal tax rates on mobile types of capital income while increasing tax revenue. Third, drastic changes in the legal structure of the income tax and stability in aggregate tax policy outcomes were facilitated by proportional representation and legislative majority rule.
Aaron, H. J., Galper, H. , & Pechman, J. A. (Eds.). (1988). Uneasy compromise. Problems of a hybrid income-consumption tax. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
2.
Andersson, K., Kannianinen, V., Södersten, J., & Sørensen, P.B. (1998). Corporate tax policy in the Nordic countries. In P. B. Sorensen (Ed.), Tax policy in the Nordic countries (pp. 72-137). Houndmills , UK: MacMillan.
3.
Baldwin, P. (1990). The politics of social solidarity. Class bases of the European welfare state 1975-1975. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Basinger, S., & Hallerberg, M. (2004). Remodeling the competition for capital: How domestic politics erases the race-to-the-bottom. American Political Science Review, 98, 261-276.
5.
Bille, L. (2004). Denmark. European Journal of Political Research , 43, 989-992.
6.
Birchfield, V., & Crepaz, M.M.L. (1998). The impact of constitutional structures and collective and competitive veto points on income inequality in industrialized democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 34, 175-200.
7.
Boadway, R. (1999). National tax policy for an international economy: Comments. In T. J. Courchene (Ed.), Room to maneuvre? Globalization and policy convergence (pp. 383-389). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
8.
Canard, N.-F. (1969). Principes d'économie politique [Principles of economic policy]. Rome: Edizioni Bizzarri. (Original work published in 1801)
9.
Carey, D., & Rabesona, J. (2002). Tax ratios on labour and capital income and on consumption. OECDEconomic Studies , 35, 129-174.
10.
Christensen, J. (1998). Socialpolitiske strategier 1945-1972 [Strategies of social policy 1945-1972]. Odense, Denmark: Odense Universitetsforlag.
11.
Cleveland, W.S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatter plots. Journal of the American Statistical Association,74, 829-836.
12.
Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and pitfalls. Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49, 56-91.
13.
Damgaard, E. (2000). Denmark: The life and death of government coalitions . In W. C. Müller & K. Strøm (Eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 231-263). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
Davies, J.B., & Hoy, M. (2002). Flat rate taxes and economic inequality measurement . Journal of Public Economics, 84, 33-46.
15.
Ervik, R. (2000). The hidden welfare state in comparative perspective: tax expenditures and social policy in eight countries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Department of Comparative Politics.
16.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985). Politics against markets. The social democratic road to powerPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Eurostat. (2004). Structures of the taxation system in the European Union. Data 1995-2002. Luxembourg: Author.
18.
Flora, P. (1983). State, economy, and society in Western Europe 1815-1975. A date handbook in two volumes. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
19.
Ganghof, S. (2000). Adjusting national tax policy to economic internationalization: Strategies and outcomes. In F. W. Scharpf & V. A. Schmidt (Eds.), Welfare and work in the open economy, Volume II: Diverse responses to common challenges (pp. 597-645). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Ganghof, S. (2006a). The politics of income taxation. Colchester, UK: European Consortium for Political Research Press.
21.
Ganghof, S. (2006b). The politics of tax structure (Working Paper 06/1). Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
22.
Ganghof, S. (2006c). Tax mixes and the size of the welfare state. Causal mechanisms and policy implications. Journal of European Social Policy, 16.
23.
Ganghof, S., & Eccleston, R. (2004). Globalisation and the dilemmas of income taxation in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 519-534.
24.
Gerring, J., Thacker, S.C., & Moreno, C. (2005). Centripetal democratic governance: A theory and global inquiry. American Political Science Review, 99, 567-581.
25.
Gordon, R., Kalambokidis, L., & Slemrod, J. (2004). Do we now collect any revenue from taxing capital income? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 981-1009.
26.
Hallerberg, M., & Basinger, S. (1998). Internationalization and changes in tax policy in OECD countries: The importance of domestic veto players. Comparative Political Studies, 31, 321-352.
27.
Hettich, W., & Winer, S.L. (1999). Democratic choice and taxation. A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Howard, C. (1997). The hidden welfare state. Tax expenditures and social policy in the United StatesPrinceton: Princeton University Press.
29.
Huber, E., Ragin, C., & Stephens, J.D. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 711-749.
30.
Huber, E., & Stephens, J.D. (1998). Internationalization and the social democratic model: Crisis and future prospects. Comparative Political Studies, 31, 353-397.
31.
Huber, E., & Stephens, J.D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
32.
Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2005). Electoral institutions, parties, and the politics of class: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Department of Government, Cambridge, MA.
33.
Jungar, A.-C. (2002). A case of a surplus majority government: The Finnish Rainbow Coalition. Scandinavian Political Studies, 25, 57-82.
34.
Kato, J. (2003). Regressive taxation and the welfare state. Path dependence and policy diffusionCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Kenworthy, L. (2005). Taxes, inequality and employment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona, Department of Sociology, Tucson.
36.
Kobach, K.W. (1993). The referendum: Direct democracy in Switzerland . Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
37.
Kraus, F. (1981). The historical development of income inequality in Western Europe and the United States. In P. Flora & A. J. Heidenheimer (Eds.), The development of welfare states in Europe and America (pp. 187-236). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
38.
Lefmann, O., & Larsen, K.K. (2000). Land-value taxation around the world: Denmark . American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59, 185-204.
39.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Lindert, P.H. (2004). Growing public: Social spending and economic growth since the eighteenth century. Volume one: The storyCambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Lotz, K. (1993). The Danish Tax Reform 1987. In Nordic Council for Tax Research (Ed.), Tax reform in the Nordic countries (pp. 13-26). Uppsala, Sweden: Iustus.
42.
McGann, A.J. (2004). The tyranny of the supermajority. How majority rule protects minorities. Journal of Theoretical Politics , 16, 52-77.
43.
Messere, K., de Kam, F., & Heady, C. (2003). Tax policy: Theory and practice in OECD countries . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
Miller, K.E. (1996). Friends and rivals. Coalition politics in Denmark, 1901-1995. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
45.
Nannestad, P., & Green-Pedersen, C. (forthcoming). Keeping the bumblebee flying: Economic policy in the welfare state of Denmark, 1973-99. In E. Albäk, L. Eliason, & A. S. Norgaard (Eds.), Managing the Danish welfare state under pressure: Towards a theory of the dilemmas of the welfare state. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
46.
Nielsen, S.B., Frederiksen, N.K., & Lassen, D.D. (1999). Would the flat tax fall flat in Denmark? In T. M. Andersen & S. E. H. Jensen (Eds.), Macroeconomic perspectives on the Danish economy (pp. 106-133). London: Macmillan .
47.
Nordic Council for Tax Research. (Ed.). (1993 ). Tax reform in the Nordic countries. Uppsala , Sweden: Iustus.
48.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2000). Economic surveys: Denmark 1999-2000. Paris: Author.
49.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). Revenue statistics 1965-2002. Paris: Author.
50.
Petersen, K. (1998). Legitimität und Krise. Die politische Geschichte des dänischen Wohlfahrtsstaates 1945-1973 [Legitimacy and crisis. The political history of the Danish welfare state 1945-1973]. Berlin : Berlin Verlag.
51.
Przeworski, A., & Wallerstein, M. (1988). The structural dependence of the state on capital. American Political Science Review , 82, 11-29.
52.
Qvortrup, M. (2000). Checks and balances in a unicameral parliament: The case of the Danish minority referendum. Journal Legislative Studies, 6, 15-28.
53.
Scharpf, F.W. (2001). Employment and the welfare state. A continental dilemma. In B. Ebbinghaus & P. Manow (Eds.), Comparing welfare capitalism. Social policy and political economy in Europe, Japan and in the USA (pp. 270-283). London: Routledge.
54.
Sørensen, P.B. (1988). Wealth taxation, income taxation, and saving (Blue Mimeo 163). University of Copenhagen, Institute of Economics , Denmark.
55.
Sørensen, P.B. (1998). Recent innovations in Nordic tax policy: From the global income tax to the dual income tax. In P. B. Sørensen (Ed.), Tax policy in the Nordic countries (pp. 1-27). London: Macmillan.
56.
Steinmo, S. (1993). Taxation and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
Stokes, S.C. (2001). Mandates and democracy. Neoliberalism by surprise in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
58.
Swank, D. (1998). Funding the welfare state: Globalization and the taxation of business in advanced market economies. Political Studies, 46, 671-692.
59.
Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Swank, D., & Steinmo, S. (2002). The new political economy of taxation in advanced capitalist democracies. American Journal of Political Science , 46, 642-655.
61.
Wilensky, H. (2002). Rich democracies. Political economy, public policy, and performanceBerkeley: University of California Press.
