This article examines the conditions under which the policy positions of an international organization correspond to the positions of relevant national actors. The commission of the European Union (EU) is often portrayed as an autonomous supranational actor, insulated from national interests. Recent analyses question this view, arguing that the commission is an agent in a principal—agent relationship with member states. The author formulates hypotheses on the conditions under which commissioners' nationalities affect the relative level of agreement between the commission and different member states' positions. The hypotheses are tested with more than 2,000 observations relating to 70 controversial proposals for legislation introduced by the commission from 1996 to 2000. In line with one of the hypotheses, under qualified majority voting in the council, there is relatively high agreement between the commission's positions and the positions of the home member states of the commissioners primarily responsible for drafting the legislative proposals.
Achen, Christopher H. (2006). Institutional realism and bargaining models. In Robert Thomson, Frans N. Stokman, Christopher H. Achen , & Thomas König (Eds.), The European Union decides (pp. 86-123). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Braumoeller, Bear F. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization, 58(4), 807-820.
3.
Bunse, Simone, Nicolaidis, Paul, & Magnette, Kalypso. (2005). Is the commission the small member states' best friend?Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
4.
Cini, Michelle. (1996). The European Commission: Leadership, organisation and culture in the EU administration. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
5.
Crombez, Christophe. (1996). Legislative procedures in the European community . British Journal of Political Science, 26, 199-228.
6.
Crombez, Christophe. (1997). Policy making and commission appointment in the European Union. Aussenwirtschaft, 52(1-2), 63-82.
Donnelly, Martin, & Ritchie, Ella. (1994). The College of Commissioners and their cabinets. In David Spence & Geoffrey Edwards (Eds.), The European Commission (pp. 31-61). Harlow, UK: Longman.
9.
Egeberg, Morten. (2006). Executive politics as usual: Role behaviour and conflict dimensions in the College of European Commissioners. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 1-15.
10.
Golub, Jonathan. (1999). In the shadow of the vote? Decisionmaking in the European Community. International Organization, 53(4), 737-768.
11.
Golub, Jonathan. (2002). Institutional reform and decision-making in the European Union. In Madeleine O. Hosli, Adrian Van Deemen, & Mika Widgrén (Eds.), Institutional challenges in the European Union (pp. 134-154). London: Routledge .
12.
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, & Wallace, Helen. (1997). The Council of Ministers . London: Macmillan.
13.
Hooghe, Liesbet. (1999a). Images of Europe: Orientations to European integration among senior officials of the commission. British Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 345-367.
14.
Hooghe, Liesbet. (1999b). Supranational activists or intergovernmental agents? Explaining the orientations of senior commission officials toward European integration. Comparative Political Studies, 32, 435-463.
15.
Hooghe, Liesbet. (2002). The European Commission and the integration of Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Hooghe, Liesbet. (2005). Several roads lead to international norms, but few via international socialization: A case study of the European Commission . International Organization, 59, 861-898.
17.
Hug, Simon. (2003). Endogenous preferences and delegation in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 26(1-2), 41-74.
18.
König, Thomas. (1997). Europa auf dem weg zum mehrheitssystem [Europe on the way to a majority system]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
19.
König, Thomas, Lindberg, Bjorn, Lechner, Sandra, & Pohlmeier, Winfried. (2007). Bicameral conflict resolution in the European Union: An empirical analysis of conciliation committee bargains . British Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 281-312.
20.
Laver, Michael, & Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1996). Making and breaking governments: Cabinets and legislatures in parliamentary democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Mattila, Mikko, & Lane, Jan-Erik. (2001). Why unanimity in the council? A roll call analysis of council voting. European UnionPolitics , 2(1), 31-52.
22.
Nugent, Neil. (1999). The government and politics of theEuropean Union. London: Macmillan .
23.
Nugent, Neil. (2001). The European Commission. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
24.
Pollack, Mark A. (1998). Engines of integration? Supranational autonomy and influence in the European Union. In Wayne Sandholtz & A. Stone Sweet (Eds.), Supranational governance: The institutionalization of theEuropean Union (pp. 217-249). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Scharpf, Fritz. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic?New York: Oxford University Press .
26.
Stokman, Frans N., & Thomson, Robert. (2004). Winners and losers in European Union decision making. European UnionPolitics, 5, 5-24.
27.
Thomson, Robert. (2006). Comparison of expert judgements with each other and with information from council documentation. In Robert Thomson, Frans N. Stokman, Christopher H. Achen, & Thomas König (Eds.), The European Union decides (pp. 329-347). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Thomson, Robert, Boerefijn, Jovanka, & Stokman, Frans N. (2004). Actor alignments in European Union decision making. European Journal of Political Research , 43, 237-261.
29.
Thomson, Robert, & Hosli, Madeleine. (2006). Who has power in the EU? The commission, council and parliament in legislative decision-making. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 391-417.
30.
Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans N., Achen, ChristopherH., & König, Thomas. (Eds.). (2006). The European Union decides. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Trondal, Jarle. (2006). Governing at the frontier of the European Commission: The case of seconded national officials. West EuropeanPolitics , 29(1), 147-160.
32.
Tsebelis, George. (1994). The power of the European parliament as a conditional agenda setter. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 128-142.
33.
Tsebelis, George, & Garrett, Geoffrey. (2000). Legislative politics in the European Union. European Union Politics, 1(1), 9-36.
34.
Wonka, Arndt. (2005). Delegation and abdication? The appointment of European commissioners and its policy implications (Working paper). Mannheim, Germany: University of Mannheim.
35.
Wright, Vincent. (1996). The national coordination of European policy making . In Jeremy Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy making (pp. 148-169). London: Routledge.
