Partisan theories of political economy expect that bondholders will panic with the election of a left-wing presidential candidate. The latter seems to be what happened in Brazil in the 2002 presidential elections. However, quantitative analysis of perceptions of sovereign credit risk in Argentine, Brazilian, Mexican, and Venezuelan presidential elections from 1994 until 2007 shows no real evidence of a link between partisanship and perceptions of risk, even if the left-right divide is further broken down into left, center-left, center-right, right. Instead, international and domestic economic fundamentals have a stronger influence on risk evaluations. Qualitative analysis of the individual presidential elections shows the importance of policy uncertainty in explaining why certain electoral periods seemed more critical than others and how bondholders select between multiple equilibria. This research helps shift political analysis away from partisanship and more in the direction of policies and articulation.
Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G.D. ( 1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
The Americas: Adios Menem, hallo Kircher? Argentina’s presidential election . (2003, May 3). The Economist, p. 57.
3.
The Americas: It’s all Chavez. (1998, July 4). The Economist, pp. 30-31.
4.
Argentina fighting Menem. (1995, April 22). The Economist, pp. 42-43.
5.
Argentina shades of grey. (1994, December 10). The Economist, pp. 38-39.
6.
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. ( 2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 165-176.
7.
Bernard, W., & Leblang, D. ( 2006). Democratic processes and financial markets: Pricing politics . New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Block, S.A., & Vaaler, P.M. ( 2004). The price of democracy: sovereign risk ratings, bond spreads and political business cycles in developing countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 23(6), 917-946.
9.
Buxton, J. ( 2003). Economic policy and the rise of Hugo Chávez. In S. Ellner & D. Hellinger (Eds.), Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: Class, polarization and conflict (pp. 113-130). Boulder, CO : Lynne Rienner.
10.
Cardoso, F.H., & Faletto, E. ( 1979). Dependent development. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
Castañeda, J.G., & Navia, P. ( 2007). The year of the ballot. Current History , 106(697), 51-57.
12.
Coppedge, M. ( 1998). The dynamic diversity of Latin American party systems . Party Politics, 4(4), 547-568.
13.
Cukierman, A. ( 1992). Central bank strategy, credibility and independence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Cukierman, A., Webb, S., & Neyapti, B. ( 1992). Measuring the independence of central banks and its effect on policy outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review, 6, 353-398.
15.
Dietz, H., & Myers, D.J. ( 2007). From thaw to deluge: Party system collapse in Venezuela and Peru. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(2), 59-86.
16.
Eckstein, H. ( 1975). Case studies and theory in political science. In F. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (pp. 79-138). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Eichengreen, B., & Hausmann, R. (Eds.). (2005). Other people’s money: Debt denomination and financial instability in emerging market economies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Franzese, R.J., Jr. (2002). Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science , 5, 369-421.
19.
Garrett, G. ( 1998). Global markets and national politics: Collision course or virtuous circle? International Organization, 52(4), 787-824.
20.
George, A.L., & Bennett, A. ( 2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Herron, M.C. ( 2000). Estimating the economic impact of political party competition in the 1992British election. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 320-331.
22.
Hibbs, D.A., Jr. ( 1977). Political parties and marcoeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 70(4), 1467-1487.
23.
Leaders: Change, please; Mexico’s presidential election. ( 2006, July 1). The Economist, p. 10.
24.
Leaders: Menem’s final days. (1999, May 29). The Economist, pp. 15-16.
25.
Leblang, D.A. ( 2002). The political economy of speculative attacks in the developing world. International Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 69-92.
26.
Lebowitz, M.A. ( 2006). Constuyámoslo ahora: El Socialismo para el siglo XXI [We will build it now: Socialism of the 21st century] (M. Harnecker, J. Duckworth, et al., Trans.). Caracas, Venezuela: Centro Internacional Miranda.
27.
Mahon, J.E., Jr. ( 1996). Mobile capital and Latin American development. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press .
28.
Mainwaring, S.P. ( 1999). Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
Moffett, M., & Fritsch, P. ( 1998, September 14). Real politics: Brazil strives to steady its markets as election adds to uncertainty-to back currency, it hoists interest rates, but that threatens the economy-leftist challenge to Cardoso. Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
30.
Mosley, L. ( 2003). Global capital and national governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Singh, A. ( 2005, October). Global context and regional outlook for Latin America and the Caribbean. Paper presented at a symposium sponsored by the Banco de la Republica Bogota, Colombia. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2005/101305.htm
32.
Sola, L. ( 2006). Financial credibility, legitimacy and political discretion: The Lula da Silva government. In L. Sola & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Statecrafting monetary authority: Domestic and financial order in Brazil (pp. 237-267). Oxford, UK: Centre for Brazilian Studies.
33.
Spanakos, A.P., & Renno, L.R. ( 2006). Elections and economic turbulence in Brazil: Candidates, voters and investors. Latin American Politics and Society , 48(4), 1-26.
34.
Starr, P.K. ( 1999). Capital flows, fixed exchange rates, and political survival: Mexico and Argentina, 1994-1995. In P. Oxhorn & P. K. Starr (Eds.), Markets & democracy in Latin America: Conflict or convergence (pp. 203-238). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
35.
Vaaler, P.M., Schrage, B.N., & Block, S.A. ( 2006). Elections, opportunism, partisanship and sovereign ratings in developing countries. Review of Development Economics, 10(1), 154-170.
36.
Wallerstein, I. ( 2004). World Systems Theory: An introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
