This article explains variation in levels of party system institutionalization in Asia by testing available data against several major hypotheses in the literature. The authors make three contributions to the literature on party system institutionalization. First, this study finds that historical legacies are a crucial variable affecting current levels of party system institutionalization. In particular, the immediate postwar period was the crucible from which institutionalized party systems in Asia developed. Second, the authors claim that for a significant number of institutionalized party systems, historical legacies are rooted in some element of authoritarianism, either as former authoritarian parties or as semidemocratic regimes. Third, precisely because authoritarianism has played an important role in the origins of institutionalized party systems, the authors argue that the concept of institutionalization needs to be strictly separated from the concept of democracy.
Amorim-Neto, O., & Cox, G.C. ( 1997). Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science , 41, 149-174.
2.
Bartolini, S., & Mair, P. ( 1990). Identity, competition and electoral availability: The stabilisation of European electorates, 1885-1985. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Birnir, J. ( 2007). Ethnicity and electoral politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Brownlee, J. ( 2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bruhn, K. ( 1997). Taking on Goliath: The emergence of a new left party and the struggle for democracy in Mexico. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.
6.
Chhibber, P.K. ( 2001). Democracy without associations: Transformation of the party system and social cleavages in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Clark, W.R., & Golder, M. ( 2006). Rehabilitating Duverger’s theory: Testing the mechanic and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws. Comparative Political Studies, 39, 679-708.
8.
Collier, R.B., & Collier, D. ( 1991). Shaping the political arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Colomer, J. ( 2001). Political institutions: Democracy and social choice . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
Converse, P.E. ( 1969). Of time and stability. Comparative Political Studies, 2, 139-171. Coppedge, M. (1994). Strong parties and lame ducks: Presidential partyarchy and factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Coppedge, M. ( 1998). The dynamic diversity of Latin American party systems . Party Politics, 4, 547-568.
12.
Dalton, R., McAllister, I., & Wattenberg, M. (2000). The consequences of partisan dealignment. In R. J. Dalton & M. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies (pp. 37-63). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
Desai, M. ( 2002). The relative autonomy of party practices: A counterfactual analysis of left party ascendancy in Kerala, India, 1934-1940. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 616-657.
14.
Dix, R. ( 1989). Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America . Comparative Politics, 22, 23-37.
15.
Dix, R.H. ( 1992). Democratization and the institutionalization of Latin American political parties. Comparative Political Studies , 24, 488-511.
16.
Fearon, J. ( 2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 195-222.
17.
Geddes, B., & Frantz, E. ( 2007). The effect of dictatorships on party systems in Latin America. Unpublished manuscript, University of California , Los Angeles.
18.
George, A.L., & Bennett, A. ( 2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
19.
Hicken, A. ( 2006a). Party fabrication: Constitutional reform and the rise of Thai Rak Thai. Journal of East Asian Studies, 6, 381-408.
20.
Hicken, A. ( 2006b). Stuck in the mud: Parties and party systems in democratic Southeast Asia. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 23-46.
21.
Hicken, A. ( 2008). Political engineering and party regulation in Southeast Asia. In B. Reilly & P. Nordlund (Eds.), Political parties in conflict-prone societies: Regulation, engineering and democratic development (pp. 69-94). Tokyo , Japan: United Nations University Press.
22.
Huntington, S.P. ( 1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Hutchcroft, P., & Rocamora, J. ( 2003). Strong demands and weak institutions: The origins and evolution of the democratic deficit in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3, 259-292.
24.
Kalyvas, S.N. ( 1996). The rise of Christian democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
King, D. ( 2003). Half-hearted reform: Electoral institutions and the struggle for democracy in Indonesia. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Kitschelt, H. ( 1994). The transformation of European social democracy . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Kuenzi, M., & Lambright, G. ( 2001). Party system institutionalization in 30 African countries . Party Politics, 7, 437-468.
28.
Levitsky, S. ( 1998). Institutionalization and Peronism. Party Politics, 4, 77-92.
29.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. ( 2010). Competitive authoritarianism: The emergence and dynamics of hybrid regimes in the post-cold war era. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Liddle, W.R., & Mujani, S. ( 2004). Indonesia’s approaching elections: Politics, Islam, and public opinion. Journal of Democracy, 15, 109-123.
31.
Lijphart, A., Rogowski, R., & Weaver, K. ( 1993). Separation of powers and cleavage management. In R. K. Weaver & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), Do institutions matter: Government capabilities in the United States and abroad (pp. 302-344). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32.
Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. ( 1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments . In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1-64). New York, NY: Free Press.
33.
Lupu, N., & Stokes, S. ( 2007). Democracy interrupted: Regime change and partisan stability in twentieth century Argentina. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
34.
Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.). (2003). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Mainwaring, S. ( 1999). Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (Eds.). (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. ( 2006). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In R. S. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of political parties (pp. 204-227). London, UK : SAGE.
38.
Mainwaring, S., & Zoco, E. ( 2007). Political sequences and the stabilization of inter-party competition: Electoral volatility in old and new democracies. Party Politics, 13, 155-178.
39.
McGuire, J.W. ( 1997). Peronism without Peron: Unions, parties, and democracy in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
Moser, R. ( 2001). Unexpected outcomes: Electoral systems, political parties, and representation in Russia. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
41.
Panebianco, A. ( 1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
42.
Pierson, P. ( 2004). Politics in time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Przeworski, A., & Sprague, J. ( 1986). Paper stones: A history of electoral socialism . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Randall, V., & Svasand, L. ( 2002). Party institutionalization in new democracies . Party Politics, 8, 5-29.
45.
Reich, G. ( 2001). Coordinating party choice in founding elections . Comparative Political Studies, 34, 1237-1263.
46.
Reich, G. ( 2004). The evolution of new party systems: Are early elections exceptional?Electoral Studies, 23, 232-250.
47.
Reidl, R.B. ( 2007, August). Authoritarian legacies and democratic transitions: Enduring effects for Africa’s political party systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
48.
Reilly, B. ( 2007). Democracy and diversity: Political engineering in the Asia-Pacific. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
Remmer, K. ( 1985). Redemocratization and the impact of authoritarian rule in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 17, 253-275.
50.
Roberts, K.M. ( 1998). Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51.
Roberts, K.M., & Wibbels, E. ( 1999). Party volatility and electoral systems in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. American Political Science Review, 93, 575-590.
52.
Roussias, N. ( 2007). Electoral coordination in new democracies. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
53.
Sartori, G. ( 1969). From the sociology of politics to political sociology . In S. M. Lipset (Ed.), Politics and the social sciences (pp. 65-100). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
54.
Sartori, G. ( 1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Selway, J.S. ( 2011). Cross-cuttingness, cleavage structures, and civil war onset. British Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 111-138.
56.
Slater, D. ( 2010). Ordering power: Contentious politics and authoritarian leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Smith, B. ( 2005). Life of the party: The origins of regime breakdown and persistence under single-party rule. World Politics, 57, 421-451.
58.
Smith, B. ( 2007). Hard times in the land of plenty. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
59.
Stoner-Weiss, K. ( 2001). The limited reach of Russia’s party system: Underinstitutionalization in dual transitions. Politics and Society, 29, 385-414.
60.
Tavits, M. ( 2005). The development of stable party support: Electoral dynamics in post-communist Europe. American Journal of Political Science , 49, 183-198.
61.
Tavits, M., & Annus, T. ( 2006). Learning to make votes count: The role of democratic experience. Electoral Studies, 25, 72-90.
62.
Thelen, K. ( 1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics . Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369-404.
63.
Welfling, M.B. ( 1973). Political institutionalization: Comparative analyses of African party systems. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
64.
Wittenberg, J. ( 2006). Crucibles of political loyalty: Church institutions and electoral continuity in Hungary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
