Muted differences: Entrenching legitimacy of the Bosnian statehood?

Abstract

The UNDP report The Silent Majority Speaks (2007) demonstrates widespread consent and a popular desire for change while promoting a single state with strong regions as a compromise model for Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Surprisingly, our own research (2009) on political legitimacy reveals quite the opposite tendencies, where political entities such as the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) and the Republika Srpska (RS) more often drift apart than merge together. What strikes us is the fact that the FBiH, which advocates a more integrated state, does not necessarily have more legitimate grounds for achieving that goal than the secessionist counterclaim of RS in its own right. The two entities remain worlds apart on a range of issues and agree only on rather abstract principles of an ideal political order.

Keywords

Bosnia and Herzegovina legitimacy partition power-sharing Republika Srpska

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beetham

(1994) Defining and Measuring Democracy. London: Sage.

Beetham

Lord

(1998) Legitimacy and the EU. London: Longman.

Belloni

(2009) Bosnia: Dayton is dead! Long live Dayton! Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 15: 355–75.

Berg

Ben-Porat

(2008) Introduction: Power-sharing vs. partition. Themed section on partition/conflict resolution. Nations and Nationalism 14(1): 29–37.

Bieber

(2006a) After Dayton, Dayton? The evolution of an unpopular peace. Ethnopolitics 5(1): 15–31.

Bieber

(2006b) Bosnia-Herzegovina: Slow progress towards a functional state. Southeast European & Black Sea Studies 6(1): 43–64.

Bieber

(2006c) Bosnia-Herzegovina: Ethnicity, inequality and public sector governance. In: Bangura

(ed.) Ethnic Inequalities and Public Sector Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bose

(2002) Bosnia after Dayton: Nationalist Partition and International Intervention. London: Hurst & Co.

Bose

(2005) The Bosnian State a decade after Dayton. International Peacekeeping 12(3): 322–35.

10.

Buchanan

(1998) Democracy and secession. In: Moore

(ed.) National Self-Determination and Secession. New York: Oxford University Press.

11.

Buchanan

(2002) Political legitimacy and democracy. Ethics 11(2): 689–719.

12.

Buzan

Waever

de Wilde

(1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

13.

Caspersen

(2004) Good fences make good neighbours? A comparison of conflict-regulation strategies in postwar Bosnia. Journal of Peace Research 41(5): 569–88.

14.

Chandler

(1999) The limits of peacebuilding: International regulation and civil society development in Bosnia. International Peacekeeping 6(1): 109–25.

15.

Chandler

(2005) Introduction: Peace without politics. International Peacekeeping 12(3): 307–21.

16.

Coicaud

J-M

(2002) Legitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Cox

(2001) State-Building and Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Lessons from Bosnia. Centre for Applied Studies in International Negotiations (CASIN). Geneva.

18.

Dervisbegovic

(2006) Serbs do not see their future in Bosnia (12 September). Available at: http://www.daytonproject.org/about/article.php?id=162 (accessed 16 January).

19.

European Values Study (2008) Study No. 4800. Available at: http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/evs/surveys/survey-2008.html (accessed 17 June 2011).

20.

Fuchs

Guidorossi

Svensson

(1995) Support for the democratic system. In: Klingemann

H-D

Fuchs

(eds) Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21.

Håkansson

Sjöholm

(2007) Who do you trust? Ethnicity and trust in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Europe-Asia Studies 59(6): 961–76.

22.

Hansen

(1997) Political legitimacy, confidence-building and the Dayton Peace Agreement. International Peacekeeping 4(2): 74–90.

23.

Haupt

(2006) Dayton—Bosnia and Herzegovina at a Crossroads. Paper presented at the 12th Workshop of the PfP Consortium Study Group Regional Stability in South East Europe on ‘International Peace Plans for the Balkans—A Success?’ organized by the Austrian Ministry of Defence at the Chateau Rothschild in Reichenau, Austria, 5–8 May.

24.

Hayden

(1998) Bosnia: The contradictions of ‘democracy’ without consent. East European Constitutional Review, Spring, pp. 47–51.

25.

Hayden

(2005) ‘Democracy’ without a demos? The Bosnian constitutional experiment and the intentional construction of nonfunctioning states. East European Politics and Societies 19(2): 226–59.

26.

Kaufmann

(1996) Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars. International Security 20: 136–75.

27.

Kostovicova

(2004) Republika Srpska and its boundaries in Bosnian Serb geographical narratives in the post-Dayton period. Space & Polity 8(6): 267–87.

28.

Lipset

(1959) Some social requisites of democracy, economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 59: 69–105.

29.

Lipset

(1993) A comparative analysis of the social requisites of democracy. International Social Science Journal 135(2): 155–75.

30.

Marko

(2005) Post-conflict reconstruction through state- and nation-building: The case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Diversity and Autonomy Papers EDAP 4/2005. Available at: www.eurac.edu/edap (accessed 16 January 2011).

31.

Marko

(2006) Constitutional reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2005–06. European Yearbook of Minority Issues 5. Brill.

32.

Mearshimer

Van Evara

(1995) When peace means war. The New Republic (18 December).

33.

Norris

(1999) Introduction: The growth of critical citizens. In: Norris

(ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34.

Obradovic

(1996) Policy legitimacy and the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 34(2): 191–221.

35.

O’Loughlin

Tuathail

GÓ

(2009) Accounting for separatist sentiment in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the North Caucasus of Russia: A comparative analysis of survey responses. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32(4): 591–615.

36.

Ó Tuathail

O’Loughlin

Djipa

(2006) Bosnia-Herzegovina ten years after Dayton: Constitutional change and public opinion. Eurasian Geography and Economics 47(1): 61–75.

37.

Rothstein

(2009) Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Sciences 53(3): 311–30.

38.

Schnekener

(2002) Making power-sharing work: Lessons from successes and failures in ethnic conflict regulation. Journal of Peace Research 39(2): 203–28.

39.

Simon

(1996) Popular Conceptions of Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, No. 273.

40.

Sisk

(1996) Power Sharing and International Mediation in Ethnic Conflicts. Washington D.C., USIP.

41.

Sisk

(2003) Power-sharing after civil wars: Matching problems to solutions. In: Darby

MacGinty

(eds) Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

42.

Stroschein

(2005) Examining ethnic violence and partition in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Ethnopolitics 4(1): 49–64.

43.

The Economist, Balkan Scheming, 22 October 2009.

44.

The Financial Times, Ethnic tensions stretch Bosnia’s power grid to breaking point (by Neil MacDonald), 4 November 2009.

45.

The Silent Majority Speaks, Oxford Research International 2007. Available at: www.undp.ba (accessed 16 January 2011).

46.

Tir

(2005) Dividing countries to promote peace: Prospects for long-term success of partitions. Journal of Peace Research 42(5): 545–62.

47.

Traynor

(2006) Serb move may trigger new war. The Guardian, 6 September. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,1865633,00.html#article_continue (accessed 16 January 2011).

48.

UNDP, Early Warning System Annual Reports 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Available at: http://www.undp.ba/ (accessed 16 January 2011).

49.

UNDP, Early Warning System Research 2000–2006. Special edition. Available at: http://www.undp.ba/upload/publications/5%20Years%20EWS%20Research-web%20edition.pdf (accessed 17 June 2011).

50.

Weber

(1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

51.

Whitt

(2010) Institutions and ethnic trust: Evidence from Bosnia. Europe–Asia Studies 62(2): 271–92.

52.

World Values Survey (1998, 2001). Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/ (accessed 17 June 2011).