Abstract
Corrigendum: Ditrych O and Kucera T (2022) Defence cooperation and change: how defence industry integration fostered development of the European Security Community. Cooperation and Conflict. DOI: 10.1177/00108367221099086.
The authors wish to add the following reference and update the article for the benefit of the reader:
On page 12, the sentence ‘. . . the trans-Europeanisation of defence industry has been driven by endogenous market factors, that is, economic threats to the defence industry’ is now followed with a new endnote (no. 7):
From a different theoretical perspective – that of Neo-Gramscian Historical Materialism – Kurc and Oktay (2018) put forward a similar argument that the transnational defence-industrial class in Europe and its economic interest formed the post–Cold War development of international armaments organisations, such as OCCAR and EDA.
On page 12, a reference to Kurc and Oktay’s 2018 article is added to the references at the end of this sentence:
Consequently, the following EU effort to establish EDTIB and EDEM promotes, to a significant extent, the interests of the major defence–industrial actors (Castellacci et al., 2014; Mawdsley, 2018, Kurc and Oktay, 2018).
Kurc C and Oktay S (2018) Taking production relations seriously: The role of defence firms in armaments cooperation. European Security 27(4): 469–489.