Operational claims,normative trade-offs,and the legitimation of international organizations

Abstract

To contend with rising contestation, international organizations (IOs) increasingly engage in the politics of legitimation. IO legitimation aims to accentuate IOs’ legitimacy warrants all the while accounting for their legitimacy deficits. Focusing on how IOs justify legitimacy deficits, this study identifies a distinct type of IO legitimacy claims: operational claims, which differ from normative claims commonly discussed in IO legitimation research. Specifically, it zooms on to one type of operational claim centering around the idea of trade-off. That is, IOs highlight trade-offs between institutional standards of legitimacy in response to public criticism. Failure to meet one norm is justified by the imperative to meet another that is, from IOs’ perspective, more befitting of their organizational identity. The empirical analysis comprises five cases where IOs strategically invoked different trade-off types for legitimation purposes. This research contributes to IO legitimation research by exposing the blind spot about operational claims, and more substantively, by fleshing out a common type of operational claim that features large in IO legitimation accounts.

Keywords

international organization legitimacy legitimation trade-off

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Snidal

(2000) Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization 54(3): 421–456.

Adler-Nissen

Zarakol

(2021) Struggles for recognition: The liberal international order and the merger of its discontents. International Organization 75(2): 611–634.

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (2015) Statement by Jin Liqun at a press conference in Tbilisi. Available at: https://www.aiib.org/en/news-events/news/2015/Statement-by-Jin-Liqun-at-a-Press-Conference-in-Tbilisi.html

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (2016) Address by Jin Liqun at the inaugural meeting of the Board of Governors. Available at: https://www.aiib.org/en/about-aiib/governance/board-governors/.content/index/_download/20160816034745788.pdf

Bäckstrand

Söderbaum

(2018) Legitimation and delegitimation in global governance: Discursive, institutional, and behavioral practices. In: Tallberg

Bäckstrand

Scholte

(eds) Legitimacy in Global Governance: Sources, Processes and Consequences. Oxford University Press, pp. 101–118.

Bäckstrand

Kuyper

Nasiritousi

(2021) From collaboration to contestation? Perceptions of legitimacy and effectiveness in post-Paris climate governance. Earth System Governance 9: 1–11.

Barnett

Finnemore

(1999) The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53(4): 699–732.

Barnett

Finnemore

(2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Cornell University Press.

Beetham

(1991) The Legitimation of Power. Palgrave Macmillan.

10.

Bernauer

Gampfer

(2013) Effects of civil society involvement on popular legitimacy of global environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 23(2): 439–449.

11.

Bernauer

Kalbhenn

Koubi

, et al. (2013) Is there a “depth versus participation” dilemma in international cooperation? Review of International Organizations 8: 477–497.

12.

Bernstein

(2011) Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 17–51.

13.

Bexell

Jönsson

Stappert

(2021) Whose legitimacy beliefs count? Targeted audiences in global governance legitimation processes. Journal of International Relations and Development 24(2): 483–508.

14.

Bexell

Jönsson

Uhlin

(eds) (2022) Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Practices, Justifications, and Audiences. Oxford University Press.

15.

Biglaiser

McGauvran

(2022) The effects of IMF loan conditions on poverty in the developing world. Journal of International Relations and Development 25(3): 806–833.

16.

Böhmelt

(2013) A closer look at the information provision rationale: Civil society participation in states’ delegations at the UNFCCC. Review of International Organizations 8: 55–80.

17.

Brassett

Tsingou

(2011) The politics of legitimate global governance. Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 1–16.

18.

Briançon

(2015) ECB extends freeze on emergency Greece funds. Politico, 1 July. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/ecb-freeze-emergency-greece-funds-ela-bailout-liquidity-crisis

19.

Buchanan

Keohane

(2006) The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs 20(4): 405–437.

20.

Canepa

(2017) ECB sued over decision to freeze help to Greek banks during crisis. Reuters, 19 December. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/ecb-sued-over-decision-to-freeze-help-to-greek-banks-during-crisis-idUSKBN1EC2DW

21.

Chin

(2016) Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Governance innovation and prospects. Global Governance 22(1): 11–26.

22.

Christensen

Nedergaard

(2024) All along the watch tower: The European Central Bank and legitimation strategies in times of crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 62(2): 451–467.

23.

Cottarelli

(2005) Efficiency and legitimacy: Trade-offs in IMF governance. IMF Working Paper no. 05/107, June. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Efficiency-and-Legitimacy-Trade-Offs-in-IMF-Governance-18250

24.

Davis

(2004) International institutions and issue linkage: Building support for agricultural trade liberalization. American Political Science Review 98(1): 153–169.

25.

Deitelhoff

Zimmermann

(2020) Things we lost in the fire: How different types of contestation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review 22(1): 51–76.

26.

Dellmuth

Tallberg

(2023) Legitimacy Politics: Elite Communication and Public Opinion in Global Governance. Cambridge University Press.

27.

Dellmuth

Scholte

Tallberg

(2019) Institutional sources of legitimacy for international organisations: Beyond procedure versus performance. Review of International Studies 45(4): 627–646.

28.

Dellmuth

Scholte

Tallberg

, et al. (2022) Citizens, Elites, and the Legitimacy of Global Governance. Oxford University Press.

29.

Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (2017) Mr Draghi, what are you afraid of? Release #TheGreekFiles! Available at: https://www.change.org/p/mr-draghi-what-are-you-afraid-of-release-thegreekfiles

30.

Diez

(2014) Setting the limits: Discourse and EU foreign policy. Cooperation and Conflict 49(3): 319–333.

31.

Dingwerth

Witt

Lehmann

, et al. (2019) International Organizations Under Pressure: Legitimating Global Governance in Challenging Times. Oxford University Press.

32.

Donnan

Sevastopulo

(2015) AIIB head vows to be clean, lean and green–and fast. Financial Times, 26 October. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/b6f95846-7b0d-11e5-a1fe-567b37f80b64

33.

Ecker-Ehrhardt

(2018) Self-legitimation in the face of politicization: Why international organizations centralized public communication. Review of International Organizations 13(4): 519–546.

34.

European Central Bank (2004) Decision of the European Central Bank of 4 March 2004 on public access to European Central Bank documents. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2004/258/oj/eng

35.

European Central Bank (2015) Letter from the ECB President to Mr Fabio De Masi, MEP, on the access to ECB documents. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/150918letter_demasi_3.en.pdf

36.

European Central Bank (2017) Reply to MEP Fabio De Masi and Yanis Varoufakis, on request to public access to ECB documents.

37.

Farias

DBL

Roger

(2023) Differentiation in environmental treaty making: Measuring provisions and how they reshape the depth–participation dilemma. Global Environmental Politics 23(1): 117–132.

38.

Fisher

(2010) COP-15 in Copenhagen: How the merging of movements left civil society out in the cold. Global Environmental Politics 10(2): 11–17.

39.

Grady

(2020) Coronavirus is spreading, but WHO says it’s not a global emergency. New York Times, 23 January. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/health/china-virus-who-emergency.html

40.

Grigorescu

(2015) Democratic Intergovernmental Organizations? Normative Pressures and Decision-Making Rules. Cambridge University Press.

41.

Gronau

Schmidtke

(2016) The quest for legitimacy in world politics–international institutions’ legitimation strategies. Review of International Studies 42(3): 535–557.

42.

Günther

(1993) The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law. State University of New York Press.

43.

Gutner

Thompson

(2010) The politics of IO performance: A framework. Review of International Organizations 5: 227–248.

44.

Halliday

Block-Lieb

Carruthers

(2010) Rhetorical legitimation: Global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations. Socio-Economic Review 8(1): 77–112.

45.

Hecht

(2021) When democratic governance unites and divides: Social status and contestation in the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Cooperation and Conflict 56(1): 44–64.

46.

Hooghe

Marks

(2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.

47.

Hurd

(2019) Legitimacy and contestation in global governance: Revisiting the folk theory of international institutions. Review of International Organizations 14: 717–729.

48.

International Monetary Fund (2019) 2018 review of program design and conditionality. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2019/05/20/2018-Review-of-Program-Design-and-Conditionality-46910

49.

International Monetary Fund (2023) IMF conditionality. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2023/IMF-Conditionality

50.

International Monetary Fund (2024) Operational guidance on program design and conditionality. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2024/01/30/Operational-Guidance-Note-On-Program-Design-and-Conditionality-544122

51.

Jin

(2015) Address at Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/20151021_asia_infrastructure_bank_transcript.pdf

52.

Kentikelenis

Seabrooke

(2017) The politics of world polity: Script-writing in international organizations. American Sociological Review 82(5): 1065–1092.

53.

Kentikelenis

Stubbs

(2023) A Thousand Cuts: Social Protection in the Age of Austerity. Oxford University Press.

54.

Keohane

(2011) Global governance and legitimacy. Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 99–109.

55.

Koremenos

Lipson

Snidal

(2001) The rational design of international institutions. International Organization 55(4): 761–799.

56.

Kreuder-Sonnen

(2019) China vs the WHO: A behavioural norm conflict in the SARS crisis. International Affairs 95(3): 535–552.

57.

Kuyper

Bäckstrand

Schroeder

(2017) Institutional accountability of nonstate actors in the UNFCCC: Exit, voice, and loyalty. Review of Policy Research 34(1): 88–109.

58.

Lenz

Söderbaum

(2023) The origins of legitimation strategies in international organizations: Agents, audiences and environments. International Affairs 99(3): 899–920.

59.

Lenz

Viola

(2017) Legitimacy and institutional change in international organisations: A cognitive approach. Review of International Studies 43(5): 939–961.

60.

Lindgren

Persson

(2010) Input and output legitimacy: Synergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey. Journal of European Public Policy 17(4): 449–467.

61.

Mayer

(1992) Managing domestic differences in international negotiations: The strategic use of internal side-payments. International Organization 46(4): 793–818.

62.

Morawska

Milton

(2020) It is time to address airborne transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical Infectious Diseases 71(9): 2311–2313.

63.

Morawska

Bahnfleth

Bluyssen

, et al. (2023) Coronavirus disease 2019 and airborne transmission: Science rejected, lives lost. Can society do better? Clinical Infectious Diseases 76(10): 1854–1859.

64.

Nasiritousi

Hjerpe

Linnér

(2016) The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16: 109–126.

65.

Otto

Kube

Smidt

(2024) UN peacekeeping upon deployment: Peacekeeping activities in theory and practice. Cooperation and Conflict 59(4): 488–509.

66.

Panke

Polat

Hohlstein

(2022) Who performs better? A comparative analysis of problem-solving effectiveness and legitimacy attributions to international organizations. Cooperation and Conflict 57(4): 433–456.

67.

Reus-Smit

(2007) International crises of legitimacy. International Politics 44(2–3): 157–174.

68.

Roger

(2020) The Origins of Informality: Why the Legal Foundations of Global Governance Are Shifting, and Why It Matters. Oxford University Press.

69.

Rojo

Van Dijk

(1997) “There was a problem, and it was solved!”: Legitimating the expulsion of illegal migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society 8(4): 523–566.

70.

Saltnes

(2017) Norm collision in the European Union’s external policies: The case of European Union sanctions towards Rwanda. Cooperation and Conflict 52(4): 553–570.

71.

Scharpf

(1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford University Press.

72.

Schmidt

(2013) Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and “throughput.” Political Studies 61(1): 2–22.

73.

Schmidtke

Lenz

(2024) Expanding or defending legitimacy? Why international organizations intensify self-legitimation. Review of International Organizations 19(4): 753–784.

74.

Schmidtke

Schirmer

Krösche

, et al. (2024) The legitimation of international organizations: Introducing a new dataset. International Studies Perspectives 25(1): 86–110.

75.

Scholte

(2004) Civil society and democratically accountable global governance. Government and Opposition 39(2): 211–233.

76.

Scholte

Tallberg

(2018) Theorizing the institutional sources of global governance legitimacy. In: Tallberg

Bäckstrand

Scholte

(eds) Legitimacy in Global Governance: Sources, Processes, and Consequences. Oxford University Press, pp. 56–74.

77.

Seawright

Gerring

(2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294–308.

78.

Steffek

(2003) The legitimation of international governance: A discourse approach. European Journal of International Relations 9(2): 249–275.

79.

Steffek

(2015) The output legitimacy of international organizations and the global public interest. International Theory 7(2): 263–293.

80.

Stephen

(2015) “Can you pass the salt?” The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech. European Journal of International Relations 21(4): 768–792.

81.

Tallberg

Zürn

(2019) The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework. Review of International Organizations 14: 581–606.

82.

Tallberg

Sommerer

Squatrito

(2013) The Opening Up of International Organizations. Cambridge University Press.

83.

Trachtman

(2002) Institutional linkage: Transcending “trade and. . ..” American Journal of International Law 96(1): 77–93.

84.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2022) Arrangements for intergovernmental meetings: Note by the secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/sbi2022_05E.pdf

85.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2023) Arrangements for intergovernmental meetings. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/sbi2023_08_adv.pdf

86.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2024) Project report: Process to strengthen observer engagement in the UNFCCC. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/PtSOE_%20Final%20Report.pdf

87.

Van Leeuwen

(2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press.

88.

Von Billerbeck

(2020) “Mirror, mirror on the wall”: Self-legitimation by international organizations. International Studies Quarterly 64(1): 207–219.

89.

Walter

(2021) The backlash against globalization. Annual Review of Political Science 24(1): 421–442.

90.

Woods

(2000) The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves. World Development 28(5): 823–841.

91.

World Health Organization (2020a) COVID-19 situation report 172. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200710-covid-19-sitrep-172.pdf

92.

World Health Organization (2020b) Fact: #COVID19 is not airborne [Tweet]. Available at: https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1243972193169616898

93.

World Health Organization (2020c) WHO Director-General’s statement on the advice of the IHR Emergency Committee on Novel Coronavirus. Available at: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-the-advice-of-the-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus

94.

World Health Organization (2020d) WHO emergencies Coronavirus Emergency Committee second meeting. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/transcripts/ihr-emergency-committee-for-pneumonia-due-to-the-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-press-briefing-transcript-30012020.pdf

95.

Yang

(2021) Contesting legitimacy of global governance institutions: The case of the World Health Organization during the coronavirus pandemic. International Studies Review 23(4): 1813–1834.

96.

Yang

(2023) Rhetorical coercion, institutional legitimacy and the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Global Policy 14(5): 730–741.

97.

Yang

Keukeleire

(2019) Rhetorical legitimation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Evidence from Chinese state media. Journal of Contemporary China 28(120): 932–947.

98.

Yang

Walker

(2025) Legitimating non-state actor engagement in global climate governance. International Affairs 101(2): 439–458.

99.

Zaum

(ed.) (2013) Legitimating International Organizations. Oxford University Press.

100.

Zürn

(2021) On the role of contestations, the power of reflexive authority, and legitimation problems in the global political system. International Theory 13(1): 192–204.

101.

Zürn

Binder

Ecker-Ehrhardt

(2012) International authority and its politicization. International Theory 4(1): 69–106.