Researchers have suggested that one function of touch in mixed-sex interactions is to exert influence over another person. Yet theories offer different explanations as to when women and men will use touch as an influence strategy. The gender politics hypothesis proposes that men touch more as a way to maintain inequalities present in society. In turn, the dyadic power theory proposes that both women and men will touch more depending on their goals in a given situation. The person initiating a topic of disagreement is more likely to touch in order to try and influence the other person to agree with his or her position. However, researchers have rarely examined the different assertions of these theories within intimate relationships. The present study, with 67 married heterosexual couples, was designed to provide an initial test of these theories. The authors focused on four types of touch across two problem-solving topics: one chosen by each spouse. Consistent with the dyadic power theory, results indicated that when couples discussed topics chosen by wives, wives exhibited more touches. However, no differences in these forms of touch emerged when couples discussed topics chosen by husbands. Implications for marital counseling and research are discussed.
Aida, Y., & Falbo, T. ( 1991). Relationships between marital satisfaction, resources, and power strategies. Sex Roles, 24, 43-56.
2.
Aldarondo, E. ( 2007). Advancing social justice through clinical practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
Amato, P.R., Johnson, D.R., Booth, A., & Rogers, S. ( 2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1-22.
4.
American Psychological Association. (2007). Guidelines for psychological practice with girls and women. Retrieved on December 31, 2009, from http://apa.org/practice/guidelines/girlsandwomen.pdf
5.
Argyle, M. ( 1988). Bodily communication (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.
6.
Avis, J.M. ( 1992). Where are all the family therapists? Abuse and violence within families and family therapy’s response. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 18, 225-232.
7.
Baucom, B.R., Atkins, D.C., Simpson, L.E., & Christensen, A. (2009). Prediction of response to treatment in a randomized clinical trial of couple therapy: A 2-year follow-up . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 160-173.
8.
Blumberg, R.L., & Coleman, M.T. ( 1989). A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in theAmerican couple. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 225-250.
9.
Burgoon, J. ( 1991). Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 233-259.
10.
Byrne, M., & Carr, A. ( 2000). Depression and power in marriage. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 408-427.
11.
Carney, D.R., Hall, J.A., & Lebeau, L.S. ( 2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 105-123.
12.
Chapell, M.S., Basso, E., DeCola, A., Hossack, J., Keebler, J.J., Marm, J., et al. (1998). Men and women holding hands: Whose hand is uppermost? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 127-130.
13.
Chapell, M.S., Beltran, W., Santanello, M., Takahashi, M., Bantom, S.R., Donovan, J.S., et al. (1999). Men and women holding hands II: Whose hand is uppermost? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 537-549.
14.
Coontz, S. ( 2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy or how love conquered marriage. New York: Viking.
15.
Crawford, M., & Unger, R. ( 2000). Women and gender: A feminist psychology. New York: Universal Press.
16.
Cross, S.E., & Madson, L. ( 1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
17.
DiBiase, R., & Gunnoe, J. ( 2004). Gender and culture differences in touching behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 49-62.
18.
Dunbar, N.E. ( 2004). Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication , 4, 235-248.
19.
Ferree, M.M. ( 1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884.
20.
Gallace, A., & Spence, C. ( 2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 246-259.
21.
Gottman, J.M. ( 1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy . New York: Norton.
22.
Gottman, J.M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. ( 1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5-22.
23.
Gottman, J.M., & Notarius, C.I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927-947.
24.
Gray-Little, B., Baucom, D.H., & Hamby, S.L. ( 1996). Marital power, marital adjustment, and therapy outcome . Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 292-303.
25.
Guerrero, L.K., & Andersen, P.A. (1994). Patterns of matching and initiation: Touch behavior and touch avoidance across romantic relationship stages. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 137-153.
26.
Hall, J.A. ( 1996). Touch, status, and gender at professional meetings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 23-44.
27.
Hall, J.A., & Veccia, E.M. ( 1990). More "touching" observations: New insights on men, women, and interpersonal touch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1155-1162.
28.
Hartman, D.P. ( 1977). Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 103-116.
29.
Henley, N.M. ( 1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
30.
Henley, N.M. ( 1995). Body politics revisited: What do we know today? In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 27-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
Henley, N.M., & Freeman, J. ( 1995). The sexual politics of interpersonal behavior. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (5th ed., pp. 79-91). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
32.
Herring, R.D. ( 1990). Nonverbal communication: A necessary component of cross-cultural counseling. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development , 18, 172-179.
33.
Hertenstein, M.J., Verkamp, J., Kerestes, A., & Holmes, R. ( 2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, non-human primates and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 5-94.
34.
Hill, C.E., Siegelman, L., Gronsky, B.R., Sturniolo, F., & Fretz, B.R. ( 2001). Nonverbal communication and counseling outcome. In Clara E. Hill (Ed.), Helping skills: The empirical foundation (pp. 195-209). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
Huston, T. ( 1983). Power. In H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen , J. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169-219). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
36.
Jones, S.E. ( 1994). The right to touch: Understanding and using the language of physical contact. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
37.
Kashy, D., & Kenny, D.A. ( 2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Kim, J.- Y., & Emery, C. ( 2003). Marital power, conflict, norm consensus, and marital violence in a nationally representative sample of Korean couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 197-219.
39.
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A.R. ( 1998). Language and processes in the construction of equality in new marriages. Family Relations, 47, 81-91.
40.
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A.R. ( 2009). Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships. New York: Springer .
41.
L’Abate, L., & Bagarozzi, D.A. (1993). Sourcebook of marriage and family evaluation. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
42.
LaFrance, M., Hecht, M., & Paluck, E.L. ( 2003). The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305-334.
43.
Lebow, J. ( 2006). Research for the psychotherapist: From science to practice . New York: Routledge.
44.
Lips, H.M. ( 2003). Sex and gender: An introduction. London: Mayfield Publishing Company.
45.
McGoldrick, M., & Hardy, K. (Eds.). (2008). Re-visioning family therapy: Race, culture and gender in clinical practice. New York : Guilford.
46.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2010). Retrieved May 7, 2010, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/power
47.
Ostrov, J.M. ( 2007). Social dominance in romantic relationships: A prospective longitudinal study of non-verbal processes. Social Development , 16, 580-595.
48.
Parker, L. ( 2003). Bringing power from the margins to the center in couples therapy. In T. J. Goodrich & L. Silverstein (Eds.), Feminist family therapy: Empowerment and social location (pp. 225-238). New York: American Psychological Association.
49.
Parker, L. ( 2009). Disrupting power and privilege in couples therapy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 37, 248-255.
50.
Patterson, M.L. ( 1995). A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 3-29.
51.
Sagrestano, L.M., Christensen, A., & Heavey, C.L. ( 1998). Social influence techniques during marital conflict. Personal Relationships, 5, 75-89.
52.
Sprenkle, D.H., & Piercy, F.P. ( 2005). Research methods in family therapy. New York: Guilford.
53.
Stewart, L., Stewart, A., Friedley, S., & Cooper, P. ( 1996). Communication between the sexes: Sex difference, and sex role stereotypes (3rd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
54.
Straus, M. ( 2007). Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 252-275.
55.
Sullivan, O. ( 2006). Changing gender relations, changing families: Tracing the pace of change over time. Boulder, CO: Rowan & Littlefield.
56.
Tichenor, V. ( 2005). Earning more and getting less: Why successful women can’t buy equality. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
57.
Vogel, D.L., Murphy, M.J., Werner-Wilson, R.J., Cutrona, C.E., & Seeman, J. ( 2007). Sex differences in the use of demand and withdraw behavior in marriage: Examining the social structure hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 165-177.
58.
Weigel, D.J., Bennett, K.K., & Ballard-Reisch, D.S. (2006). Influence strategies in marriage: Self and partner links between equity, strategy use, marital satisfaction, and commitment. Journal of Family Communication , 6, 77-95.
59.
Willis, F.N., Jr., & Briggs, L.F. ( 1992). Relationship and touch in public settings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 55-63.
60.
Willis, F.N., Jr., & Dodds, R.A. ( 1998). Age, relationship and touch initiation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 115-124.
61.
Zvonkovic, A.M., Schmiege, C.J., & Hall, L.D. ( 1994). Influence strategies used when couples make work-family decisions and their importance for marital satisfaction. Family Relations, 43,182-188.
