Prior studies of juvenile drug courts have been constrained by small samples, inadequate comparison groups, or limited outcome measures. The authors report on a 3-year evaluation that examines the impact of juvenile drug court participation on recidivism and drug use. A quasi-experimental design is used to compare juveniles assigned to drug court with those assigned to standard probation in Maricopa County, Arizona. Findings indicate drug court participants were less likely to recidivate than youths in the comparison group. Analyses of drug use show no significant difference between groups in marijuana use but reveal that drug court participants were more likely than juveniles in the comparison group to test positive for cocaine. Family stability, school attendance, and legal indicators were important predictors of drug court effectiveness. Last, findings indicate the majority of juveniles in drug court were unsuccessful in meeting program requirements and subsequently released to state-operated facilities or standard probation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applegate, B. K., & Santana, S. (2000). Intervening with youthful substance abusers: A preliminary analysis of a juvenile drug court. The Justice System Journal, 21(3), 281-300.
2.
Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 1-43.
3.
Belenko, S., Fagan, J. A., & Dumanovsky, T. (1994). The effects of legal sanctions on recidivism in special drug courts. The Justice System Journal, 17(1), 53-82.
4.
Cooper, C. S. (2001). Juvenile drug court programs. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
5.
Cox, S. M. (1999). An assessment of an alternative education program for at-risk delinquent youth. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(3), 323-336.
6.
Deschenes, E. P., & Greenwood, P. W. (1994). Maricopa County’s drug court: An innovative program for first-time drug offenders on probation. The Justice System Journal, 17(1), 99-116.
7.
Deschenes, E. P., & Petersen, R. D. (1999). Experimenting with the drug court model: Implementation and change in Maricopa County, Arizona. In W. C. Terry III (Ed.), The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation (pp. 139-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Deschenes, E. P., Turner, S., & Greenwood, P. W. (1995). Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County’s drug court. The Justice System Journal, 18(1), 55-73.
9.
Dishion, T. J., & Andrews, D. W. (1995). Preventing escalation in problem behavior with high-risk young adolescents: Immediate and one-year outcomes. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 63, 538-548.
10.
Garry, E. M. (1996). Truancy: First step to a lifetime of problems. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
11.
Goldkamp, J. S. (2000, October 3). What we know about the impact of drug courts: Moving research from “Do they work?” to “When and how they work.” Hearings before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Youth Violence. Oversight of the Office of Justice Programs: Program Performance, Drug Courts.
12.
Goldkamp. J. S., & Weiland, D. (1993). Assessing the impact of Dade County’s felony drug court: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
13.
Gottfredson, G. D. (1987). Peer group interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior: A selective review & a new evaluation. Criminology, 25(3), 671-714.
14.
Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. (1998). An examination of the Denver drug court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law & Policy, 20(2), 183-202.
15.
Greenwood, P. W., Model, K. E., Rydell, C. P., & Chiesa, J. (1996). Diverting children from a life of crime: What are the costs and benefits? Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16.
Harrell, A., Cavanagh, S., & Roman, J. (2000). Evaluations of the D.C. Superior Court drug intervention programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
17.
McDonald, L., & Frey, H. (1999). Families and schools together: Building relationships. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
18.
Miethe, T., Lu, H., & Reese, E. (2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime & Delinquency, 46(4), 522-541.
19.
Miller, M. L., Scocas, E. A., & O’Connell, J. P. (1998). Evaluation of the juvenile drug court diversion program. Dover, DE: Statistical Analysis Center.
20.
Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 72-96.
21.
Peters, R. H., Haas, A. L., & Murrin, M. R. (1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1), 33-60.
22.
Schiff, M., & Terry, W. C., III (1997). Predicting graduation from Broward County’s dedicated drug treatment court. The Justice System Journal, 19(3), 291-310.
23.
Shaw, M., & Robinson, K. (1998). Summary and analysis of the first juvenile drug court evaluations: The Santa Clara County Drug Treatment Court and the Delaware Juvenile Drug Court Diversion Program. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 73-85.
24.
Sickmund, M. (2000). Offenders in juvenile court, 1997. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
25.
Smith, B. E., Lurigio, A. J., Davis, R. C., Elstein, S. G., & Popkin, S. J. (1994). Burning the midnight oil: An examination of Cook County’s night drug court. The Justice System Journal, 17(1), 41-52.
26.
Spohn, C., Frenzel, E., Martin, T., & Piper, R. K. (2001). Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 149-176.
27.
Tanner, J., Davies, S., & O’Grady, B. (1999). Whatever happened to yesterday’s rebels? Longitudinal effects of youth delinquency on education and employment. Social Problems, 46(2), 250-274.
28.
Turner, S., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., & Deschenes, E. (1999). Perceptions of drug court: How offenders viewease of program completion, strength and weaknesses, and the impact on their lives. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1), 61-85.
29.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2001a). Prisoners in 2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
30.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2001b). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
31.
Vito, G. F., & Tewksbury, R. A. (1998). The impact of treatment: The Jefferson County (Kentucky) drug court program. Federal Probation, 62(2), 46-51.
32.
Voelkl, K. E., Welte, J. W., & Wieczorek, W. F. (1999). Schooling and delinquency among White and African American adolescents. Urban Education, 34(1), 69-88.
33.
Zimring, F. E. (1998). American youth violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
