The current study analyzed a subset of the experimental data collected by Berk, Ladd, Graziano, and Baek (2003) to test whether different intensities of incarceration make inmates more criminal while incarcerated. There were 561 male inmates whose equivalent classification scores indicated they had the same level of risk to commit institutional misconduct at the time they were incarcerated. One half of these inmates were sent to the lowest security-level prisons in California, and the other one half were sent to prisons one step down from the highest security level in California. If prisons are criminogenic, then the probability of misconduct should vary with the security level to which the inmates were assigned. Instead, inmates were equally likely to commit misconduct in prison regardless of whether they were assigned to a Level I (lowest security level) or a Level III prison.
Berecochea, J. E., & Gibbs, J. B. (1991). Inmate classification: A correctional program that works?Evaluation Review, 15(3), 333.
2.
Berk, R. A., & de Leuuw, J. (1999). Evaluation of California’s inmate classification system using a generalized discontinuity design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1045-1052.
3.
Berk, R. A., Ladd, H., Graziano, H., & Baek, J.-H. (2003). Randomized experiment testing inmate classification systems. Criminology and Public Policy, 2(2), 215-242.
4.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. P. (1988a). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26(1), 1-35.
5.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Farrington, D. P. (1988b). Longitudinal and criminal career research: Further clarifications. Criminology, 26(1), 57-74.
6.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. (1986). Introduction: Studying criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth, & C. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and career criminals (Vol. 1, pp. 13-20). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
Bushway, S. D., Piquero, A. R., Broidy, L. M., Cauffman, E., & Mazerolle, P. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology, 39, 491-515.
8.
California Department of Corrections. (2001). Monthly report of population as of midnight January 31, 2001 (TPOP-8). Sacramento, CA: Data Analysis Unit.
9.
Camp, C. G., & Camp, G. M. (2002). The 2001 corrections yearbook. Middletown, CT: Criminal Justice Institute.
10.
Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Klein-Saffran, J., Daggett, D. M., & Saylor, W. G. (2002). Using inmate survey data in assessing prison performance: A case study comparing private and public prisons. Criminal Justice Review, 27(1), 26-51.
11.
Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Langan, N. P., & Saylor, W. G. (2003). The influence of prisons on inmate misconduct: A multilevel investigation. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 701-734.
12.
Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., & Saylor, W. G. (2002). Quality of prison operations in the U.S. federal sector: A comparison with a private prison. Punishment and Society, 4(1), 27-52.
13.
Chen, M. K., & Shapiro, J. M. (2002). Does prison harden inmates? A discontinuity-based approach. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University at Cambridge, MA.
14.
Clemmer, D. (1940). The prison community. Boston: Christopher Publishing House.
15.
Cook, P. J., & Laub, J. H. (1998). The unprecedented epidemic in youth violence. Crime and Justice, 24, 27.
16.
Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic Press.
17.
Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 7, pp. 189-250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
19.
Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C. E., & Law, M. A. (1997). Predicting prison misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(4), 414-431.
21.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1986). The true value of lambda would appear to be zero: An essay on career criminals, criminal careers, selective incapacitation, cohort studies, and related topics. Criminology, 24, 213-234.
22.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1987). The methodological adequacy of longitudinal research on crime. Criminology, 25, 581-614.
23.
Irwin, J. (1980). Prisons in turmoil. Boston: Little, Brown.
24.
Jacobs, J. B. (1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Johnson, R., & Toch, H. (Eds.). (1982). The pains of imprisonment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Langan, N. P., Camp, S. D., & Saylor, W. G. (2004). Is prison misconduct analogous to crime?Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
27.
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 1-69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Robbins, L. N. (1978). Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocial behavior: Replications from longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 8, 611-622.
29.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41(3), 555-592.
31.
Sparks, R., Bottoms, A., & Hay, W. (1996). Prisons and the problem of order. New York: Clarendon.
32.
Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1974). Criminology (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
33.
Sykes, G. M. (1958). Society of captives: A study of maximum security prisons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
