Based on availability of case management services, drug-involved women offenders entered either a probation case management (PCM) intervention(n = 65) or standard probation(n = 44). Participants were placed in the case management condition until all slots were filled, then placed in standard probation until case management slots opened. Participants were interviewed at program entry and at 6- and 12-month follow-up using measures of substance abuse, psychiatric symptoms, and social support. Results showed modest change over time in both conditions, but PCM did not result in more services or treatment, or better outcomes than standard probation. These findings are discussed in the context of study limitations and in the context of state initiatives like those in Arizona and California designed to apply treatment as an alternative to incarceration.
Administrative Office of the Courts. (1999). Drug treatment education fund: Legislative report for fiscal year 1997-1998. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Supreme Court.
2.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3.
Anglin, M. D. (Ed.). (1988). The efficacy of civil commitment in treating narcotics addiction. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
4.
Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y.-I. (1991). Criminal justice and the drug abusing offender: Policy issues of coerced treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 243-267.
5.
Arfken, C. L., Klein, C., Agius, E. J., & di Menza, S. (2003). Implementation of selected target cities components: Analysis of matching, case management, and linkages. In R. C. Stephens, C. K. Scott, & R. D. Muck (Eds.), Clinical assessment and substance abuse treatment: The target cities experience (pp. 103-128). Albany,: State University of New York Press.
6.
Austin, C. D., & McLelland, R. W. (1994). Case management in human services: Reflections on public policy. Journal of Case Management, 6, 119-126.
7.
Beck, A. T. (1972). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8.
Bloom, B., & Steinhart, D. (1993). Why punish the children? A reappraisal of the children of incarcerated mothers in America. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
9.
Brindis, C. D., & Theidon, K. S. (1997). The role of case management in substance abuse treatment services for women and their children. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 29, 79-88.
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Women offenders: Special report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1998). Behind bars: Substance abuse and America’s prison population. New York: Author.
12.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1998). Continuity of offender treatment for substance use disorders from institution to community (Treatment Improvement Protocol Series, No. 30). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
13.
Chan, M., Jessup, M., Prem, R., Revels, T., & Guydish, J. (2002). Case management process evaluation report. The San Francisco women’s network (Project Evaluation Report No. 7). San Francisco: University of California, San Francisco, Institute for Health Policy Studies.
14.
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Haberman, H. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 73-94). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
15.
Dennis, M. L., Fetterman, D. M., & Sechrest, L. (1994). Integrating qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods in substance abuse research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 419-427.
16.
Department of Health and Human Services. (1995). Demonstration cooperative agreements for development and implementation of criminal justice treatment networks. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
Derogatis, L. R. (1983). The SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring & procedures manual II. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
18.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 438-452.
19.
Guydish, J., Ponath, C., Bostrom, A., Campbell, K., & Barron, N. (2003). Effects of losing SSI benefits on standard drug and alcohol outcome measures. Contemporary Drug Problems, 30, 169-193.
20.
Hammett, T. M., Gaiter, J. L., & Crawford, C. (1998). Reaching at-risk populations: Health interventions in criminal justice settings. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 99-120.
21.
Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (1997). Application of random effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 2, 64-78.
22.
Henderson, D. (1998). Drug abuse and incarcerated women: A research review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15, 579-587.
23.
Henderson, D., Schaeffer, J., & Brown, L. (1998). Gender-appropriate mental health services for incarcerated women: Issues and challenges. Family and Community Health, 21(3), 42-53.
24.
Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., Rachal, J. V., Harwood, H., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Ginzburg, H. M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
25.
Jessup, M., Edwards, L., Mason, T., Miller, L., & Katz, R. (2001). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Judicial and corrections panel. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 33, 355-367.
26.
Jett, K. P. (2001). Proposition36: Issues and challenges. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 33, 321-328.
27.
Jordan, K. J., Federman, E. B., Burns, B. J., Schlenger, W. E., Fairbank, J. A., & Caddell, J. M. (2002). Lifetime use of mental health and substance abuse treatment services by incarcerated women felons. Psychiatric Services, 53, 317-325.
28.
Kleiman, M. A. R., Tran, T. H., Fishbein, P., Magula, M. T., Allen, W., & Lacy, G. (2003). Opportunities and barriers in probation reform: A case study of drug testing and sanctions. Berkeley: California Policy Research Center.
29.
Knight, K., Hiller, M. L., & Simpson, D. D. (1997, November). Prison-base therapeutic community treatment: The Texas model. Paper presented at the American Society on Criminology 49th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
30.
Lake, E. (1993). Exploration of violent victim experiences of female offenders. Violence Victims, 8, 41-51.
31.
Laken, M. P., & Ager, J. W. (1996). Effects of case management on retention in prenatal substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 22, 439-448.
32.
Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13-22.
33.
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS systems for mixed models. Cary, SC: SAS Institute.
34.
Lockwood, D., Inciardi, J. A., & Surratt, H. L. (1997). Crest Outreach Center: A model for blending treatment and corrections. In F. M. Tims, J. A. Inciardi, B. W. Fletcher, & A. M. Horton (Eds.), The effectiveness of innovative approaches in the treatment of drug abuse. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
35.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Fain, T. (in press). Effects of case management on parolee misconduct: The Bay Area services network. Criminal Justice and Behavior.
36.
Marquart, J. W., Brewer, V. E., & Mullings, J. L. (1999). Health risk as an emerging field within the new penology. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 142-154.
37.
Masson, C., Sorensen, J. L., Batki, S. L., Okin, R., Delucchi, K. L., & Perlman, D. C. (2002). Medical service use and financial charges among opiod users at a public hospital. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 66, 45-50.
38.
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Cacciola, J., Griffith, J., Evans, F., Barr, H. L., & O’Brien, C. P. (1985). New data from the addiction severity index: Reliability and validity in three centers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 412-423.
39.
McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., & O’Brien, C. P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The addiction severity index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 26-33.
40.
Pearson, F. S. (1988). Evaluation of New Jersey’s intensive supervision program. Crime & Delinquency, 34, 347-448.
41.
Polcin, D. L. (2001). Drug and alcohol offenders coerced into treatment: A review of modalities and suggestions for research on social model programs. Substance Use and Misuse, 36, 589-608.
42.
Prendergast, M., Wellisch, J., & Falkin, G. (1995). Assessment of and services for substance-abusing women offenders in community and correctional settings. Prison Journal, 75, 240-256.
43.
Rapp, C. A. (1998). The active ingredients of effective case management: A research synthesis. Community Mental Health Journal, 34, 363-380.
44.
San Francisco Adult Probation Department. (1996). Annual Report 1995/1996.
45.
Siefert, K., & Pimlott, S. (2001). Improving pregnancy outcome during imprisonment: A model residential care program. Social Work, 46, 125-134.
46.
Singer, M. I., Bussey, J., Song, L. Y., & Lunghofer, L. (1995). The psychosocial issues of women serving time in jail. Social Work, 40, 103-113.
47.
Snell, T. (1992). Women in prison. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
48.
Snell, T., & Morton, D. C. (1994). Survey of state prison inmates: Women in prison. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
49.
Sorensen, J. L., Dilley, J., London, J., Okin, R. L., Delucchi, K. L., & Phibbs, C. S. (2003). Case management for substance abusers with HIV/AIDS: A randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 29, 133-150.
50.
Speiglman, R., Klein, D., Miller, R., & Noble, A. (2003). Early implementation of Proposition 36: Criminal justice and treatment system issues in eight counties. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, SARC Supplement No. 1, 133-141.
51.
Staton, M., Leukefeld, C., & Logan, T. K. (2001). Health service utilization and victimization among incarcerated female substance users. Substance Use & Misuse, 36, 701-716.
52.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (1997). Substance abuse among women in the United States. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Applied Studies.
53.
Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., & McClelland, G. M. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. I. Pretrial jail detainees. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 505-512.
54.
Turner, S., Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1992). Evaluating intensive supervision probation or parole (ISP) for drug offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 38, 539-556.
55.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1998). Special report: Substance abuse treatment of adults on probation (in 1995) (Report number NJC1666611). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
56.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2003). Probation and parole statistics. Retrieved March 5, 2004, from www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pandp.htm
57.
Vigilante, K. C., Flynn, M. M., Affleck, P. C., Stunkle, J. C., Merriman, N. A., Flanigan, T. P., et al. (1999). Reduction in recidivism of incarcerated women through primary care, peer counseling, and discharge planning. Journal of Women’s Health, 8, 409-415.
58.
Wellisch, J., Anglin, D., & Prendergast, M. (1993). Treatment strategies for drug abusing women offenders. In J. Inciardi (Ed.), Drug treatment and criminal justice (pp. 5-29). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
Windell, P. A., & Barron, N. B. (2002). Treatment preparation in the context of system coordination serves inmates well. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 34, 59-67.
60.
Young, D. S. (1998). Health status and service use among incarcerated women. Journal of Prison Jail Health, 10, 43-57.
