This article reviews how criminal justice research that responds to the needs of policymakers can have a significant impact in informing and shaping public policy. It examines recent major sentencing reforms in Texas in the context of how policy research was a critical element in the development and adoption of a new sentencing system. It then argues that, for researchers to be effective in the public policy arena, they have to use judgment to synthesize massive amounts of data into a contextual framework useful for informing policymakers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Fabelo, Tony
. 1992. “Making the Obvious Possible: Policy Research and the Building of Coalitions for Criminal Justice Reforms.”Crime & Delinquency38:369-391.
2.
Petersilia, Joan
. 1991. “Policy Relevance and the Future of Criminology.”Criminology29:1-15.
3.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992a. In a Nutshell: Trends and Strategic Issues in Texas Criminal Justice. Austin: State of Texas.
4.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992b. “Strategic Issues in Criminal Justice.”Briefing to Correctional Resource Subcommittee of Texas Punishment Standards Commission.
5.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992c. Interim Projections: Fiscal Years 1992-1998. Austin: State of Texas.
6.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992d. Simulation of Impact: Abolishing Parole and Good Time. Austin: State of Texas.
7.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992e. Recidivism in the Texas Criminal Justice System. Austin: State of Texas.
8.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992f. An Overview of Prison Sentences and Time Served in Texas. Austin: State of Texas.
9.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992g. Simulation of Impact: Projected Prison Population to Deplete Jail Backlog FY 1992-1998. Austin: State of Texas.
10.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992h. Simulation of Impact: Abolishing Parole for Aggravated Offenders. Austin: State of Texas.
11.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992i. “Trapped in a Dilemma: Parole and Managing the Prison Population Crowding.”Briefing to Subcommittee of House Corrections Committee.
12.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992j. Sentencing Reform and Prison Crowding in Texas: Facing the Tough Choices of the 1990's. Austin: State of Texas.
13.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992k. Impact Analysis of Sentencing System Proposed by the Texas Punishment Standards Commission. Austin: State of Texas.
14.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1992l. Impact Analysis of S.B. 1067: Sentencing Reform Recommendations. Austin: State of Texas.
15.
State of Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council
. 1993. Sentencing Dynamics Study: A Sourcebook of Sentencing Practices in Urban Texas in 1991. Austin: State of Texas.
16.
Texas District and County Attorneys Association
. 1993. “Proposed Changes to State Jail Felony.” Memorandum.
17.
Texas Punishment Standards Commission
. 1993. Recommendations to the 73rd Legislature. Austin: Texas Punishment Standards Commission.