This article presents an assessment of the Neutral Zone, a community-based gang prevention and intervention program developed in Mountlake Terrace and now operating in several other Washington communities. The Neutral Zone offers youths at risk of joining a gang or already gang-affiliated an attractive and safe alternative for productively spending their time. An evaluation suggests that this late evening program provides viable recreational and social service activities to some 190 youths each Friday and Saturday night. Data from direct observation, focus group interviews with participants and program staff, and official crime statistics indicate that the Neutral Zone is an effective alternative to traditional law enforcement approaches which typically rely on police crackdowns and curfews to regulate gang activity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benson, Carol
. 1990. “Gang Diversion.”Law and Order38:66-68.
2.
Cloward, Richard A.
and Lloyd E. Ohlin. 1960. Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.
3.
Community Action Resource Team
. 1993, November. The Neutral Zone: A Non-Traditional Gang/Crime Prevention, Late-Night Program for High Risk Kids. Mountlake Terrace, WA: Mountlake Terrace Police Department.
4.
Conly, Catherine
, Patricia Kelly, and Paul Mahanna. 1993. Street Gangs: Current Knowledge and Strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5.
Conly, Catherine
, Patricia Kelly, Paul Mahanna, and Lynn Warner. 1993, August. Street Gangs: Current Knowledge and Strategies. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Report #OJP-89-C-009.
6.
Figueira-McDonough, Josefina
. 1991. “Community Structure and Delinquency: A Typology.”The Social Service Review65:68-91.
7.
Fox, Jerry R.1985. “Mission Impossible? Social Work Practices with Black Urban Youth Gangs.”Social Work30:25-31.
8.
Gottfredson, Michael R.
and Don Gottfredson. 1988. Decisionmaking in Criminal Justice, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
9.
Gove, Walter R.
, Michael Hughes, and Michael Geerken. 1985. “Are Uniform Crime Reports a Valid Indicator of the Index Crimes? An Affirmative Answer with Minor Qualifications.”Criminology23:451-501.
10.
Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee
. 1992. Juvenile Justice Report. Olympia, WA: Department of Social and Health Services.
11.
Hagedorn, John
. 1988. People and Folks. Chicago: Lakeview Press.
12.
Howell, James
. 1994. “Recent Gang Research: Program and Policy Implications.”Crime & Delinquency40:495-515.
13.
Huff, C. Ronald
. 1990. “Denial, Overreaction, and Misidentification: A Postscript on Public Policy.” Pp. 310-317 in Gangs in America, edited by C. R. Huff. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Huff, C. Ronald
. 1994. “Gangs and Public Policy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Chicago.
15.
Jankowski, Martin Sanchez
. 1991. Islands in the Street. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
Levine, Margaret J.
and J. Thomas McEwen. 1985. Patrol Deployment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice Report #J-LEAA-011-81.
17.
Messner, Steven F.
and Richard Rosenfeld. 1994. Crime and the American Dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
18.
Osgood, D. Wayne
, Patrick M. O'Malley, Jerald G. Bachman, and Lloyd D Johnston. 1989. “Time Trends and Age Trends in Arrests and Self-Reported Illegal Behavior.”Criminology27:389-415.
19.
Payton, George T.
1977. Patrol Procedure. Los Angeles: Legal Book Corporation.
20.
Rittel, Horst W.
and Melvin Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in General Theory Planning.”Policy Sciences4:155-169.
21.
Rossi, Peter H.
and Howard E. Freeman. 1989. Evaluation, 5th ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
Skogan, Wesley
. 1976. “Crime and Crime Rates.” Pp. 27-41 in Sample Surveys of Victims of Crime, edited by W. Skogan. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
23.
Snyder, Howard
. 1993, April. Special Analysis for OJJDP. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
24.
Spergel, Irving
. 1989a. Youth Gangs: Problems and Response. A Review of the Literature. (Tech. Rep. No. 1, National Youth Gang Suppression and Intervention Project). Chicago: School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago.
25.
Spergel, Irving
. 1989b. “Youth Gangs: Continuity and Change.” Pp. 171-275 in Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 12, edited by N. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Spergel, Irving
and G. David Curry. 1990. “Strategies and Perceived Agency Effectiveness in Dealing with the Youth Gang Problem.” Pp. 288-309 in Gangs in America, edited by C. R. Huff. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Stewart, David
and Prem N. Shamdasani. 1990. Focus Groups. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Thompson, David
and Leonard Jason. 1988. “Street Gangs and Preventive Interventions.”Criminal Justice and Behavior15:323-333.
29.
Thrasher, Frederic M.
1927. The Gang: A Study of 1,313 Gangs in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
