Although the relevance of social interactions or social networks for fertility research has been increasingly acknowledged in recent years, little is known about the channels and mechanisms of social influences on individuals’ fertility decision-making. Drawing on problem-centred interviews and network data collected among young adults in western Germany, the authors show that qualitative methods broaden our understanding of social and contextual influences on couples’ fertility intentions, by exploring the phenomenon, taking subjective perceptions into account, analysing interactions within networks as well as the dynamics of networks. Qualitative methods allow for the collection and analysis of rich retrospective information on network dynamics in relation to life course events. This can also be helpful both to complement the still rare longitudinal data on social networks and to develop parsimonious and efficient survey instruments to collect such information in a standardized way.
Antonucci, T. ( 1986) ‘Hierarchical Mapping Technique’, Generations10(4): 10-12.
2.
Aquilino, W.S. ( 2005) ‘Impact of Family Structure on Parental Attitudes toward the Economic Support of Adult Children over the Transition to Adulthood’ , Journal of Family Issues26(2): 143-67.
3.
Arai, L. ( 2007) ‘Peer and Neighbourhood Influences on Teenage Pregnancy and Fertility: Qualitative Findings from Research in English Communities’ , Health and Place13(1): 87-98.
4.
Axinn, W.G., Clarkberg, M.E. and Thornton, A. ( 1994) ‘Family Influences on Family Size Preferences’ , Demography31(1): 65-79.
5.
Barnes, J.A. ( 1954) ‘Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish’ , Human Relations7(1): 39-58.
6.
Bernardi, L. ( 2003) ‘Channels of Social Influence on Reproduction’ , Population Research and Policy Review22(5-6): 527-55.
7.
Bernardi, L., Keim, S. and von der Lippe, H. ( 2007) ‘Social Influences on Fertility: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study in Eastern and Western Germany’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(1): 1-27.
8.
Bernardi, L., Klärner, A. and von der Lippe, H. ( 2008) ‘Job Insecurity and the Timing of Parenthood: A Comparison between Eastern and Western Germany’, European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie24(3): 287-313; doi: 10.1007/s10680-007-9145-3.
9.
Bidart, C. and Lavenu, D. ( 2005) ‘Evolutions of Personal Networks and Life Events’ , Social Networks27(4): 359-76.
10.
Billy, J.O.G. and Udry, R.J. ( 1985) ‘Patterns of Adolescent Friendship and Effects on Sexual Behavior’, Social Psychology Quarterly48(1): 27-41.
11.
Bongaarts, J. and Watkins, S.C. ( 1996) ‘Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions’, Population and Development Review22(4): 639-82.
12.
Bott, E. ( 1957) Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. New York: The Free Press.
13.
Breiger, R.L. ( 2004) ‘The Analysis of Social Networks’, in M. Hardy and A. Bryman (eds) Handbook of Data Analysis, pp. 505-26. London : Sage.
14.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1988) ‘Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital’ , American Journal of Sociology94 (Supplement: ‘Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure’): S95-S120.
15.
Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. ( 1994) ‘Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency’ , American Journal of Sociology99(6): 1411-54.
16.
Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. ( 1998) ‘What is Agency?’, American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962-1032.
17.
Engstler, H. and Menning, S. ( 2003) Die Familie im Spiegel der amtlichen Statistik. Lebensformen, Familienstrukturen, wirtschaftliche Situation der Familien und familiendemographische Entwicklung in Deutschland. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.
18.
Flick, U. ( 2002) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
19.
Freeman, L.C. ( 1979) ‘Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification’ , Social Networks1(3): 215-39.
20.
Freeman, L.C. ( 2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
21.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360-80.
22.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, The American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481-510.
23.
Hollstein, B. ( 2006) ‘Qualitative Methoden und Netzwerkanalyse - Ein Widerspruch?’, in B. Hollstein and F. Straus (eds) Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendungen, pp. 11-35. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
24.
Huinink, J. ( 2002) ‘Polarisierung der Familienentwicklung in europäischen Ländern im Vergleich’, in N. Schneider and H. Matthias-Bleck (eds) Elternschaft heute. Gesellschaftliche Rahmenbedingungen und individuelle Gestaltungsaufgaben , pp. 49-74. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
25.
Jansen, D. ( 2003) Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
26.
Kohler, H.-P. ( 2001) Fertility and Social Interaction: An Economic Perspective . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
27.
Kohler, H.-P. and Bühler, C. ( 2001) ‘Social Networks and Fertility’, in N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (eds) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 21, pp. 14,380-4. Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier Sciences .
28.
Konietzka, D. and Kreyenfeld, M. ( 2004) ‘Angleichung oder Verfestigung von Differenzen. Geburtenentwicklung und Familienformen’, Berliner Debatte Initial15(4): 26-41.
29.
Kreyenfeld, M. ( 2003) Employment and Fertility: East Germany in the 1990s. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
30.
Kühn, T. ( 2006) ‘Soziale Netzwerke im Fokus von qualitativen Sekundäranalysen am Beispiel einer Studie zur Biografiegestaltung junger Erwachsener’ , in B. Hollstein and F. Straus (eds) Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendungen, pp. 391-415. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
31.
Mandemakers, J.J. and Dykstra, P.A. ( 2008) ‘Discrepancies in Parent’s and Adult Child’s Reports of Support and Contact’, Journal of Marriage and Family70(2): 495-506.
32.
Mitchell, J.C. ( 1973) ‘Networks, Norms, and Institutions,’ in J. Boissevain and J. C. Mitchell (eds) Network Analysis - Studies in Human Interaction, pp. 2-35. The Hague: Mouton.
33.
Murphy, M. and Wang, D. ( 2001) ‘Family-Level Continuities in Childbearing in Low-Fertility Societies’, European Journal of Population17(1): 75-96.
34.
Philipov, D., Spéder, Z. and Billari, F.C. ( 2006) ‘Soon, Later, or Ever? The Impact of Anomie and Social Capital on Fertility Intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001)’ , Population Studies60(3): 289-308.
35.
Portes, A. ( 1998) ‘Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology24: 1-24.
36.
Schütze, Y. ( 2006): ‘Quantitative und qualitative Veränderungen in den sozialen Netzwerken junger Migranten - Ergebnisse einer Langzeitstudie’ , in B. Hollstein and F. Straus (eds) Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendungen, pp. 295-310. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag
37.
Steenhof, L. and Liefbroer, A.C. ( 2008) ‘Intergenerational Transmission of Age at First Birth in the Netherlands for Birth Cohorts Born between 1935 and 1984: Evidence from Municipal Registers’, Population Studies62(1): 69-84.
38.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. ( 1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
39.
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. ( 1999) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Witzel, A. ( 2000) ‘Das problemzentrierte Interview’, Forum Qualitative Social Research1(1), at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbm:de:0114-fqs0001228
