This article focuses on how parental school choices affect the degree of racial and academic segregation in charter schools. The research design allows for a direct comparison of the racial and academic conditions of the district schools students exited to the charter schools they entered. Parents choose to leave more racially integrated district schools to attend more racially segregated charter schools. Simultaneously, parents enroll their students into charter schools with at least the same degree of academic integration as the district schools that students exited. The academic and racial segregation results are then used to test the extent to which students congregate into specialized charter schools according to hypothesized patterns. The findings call into question the assertion of charter school advocates that segregated conditions in charter schools are the result of students self-selecting into specialized charter schools.
Archbald, D.A. (2000). School choice and school stratification: Shortcomings of the stratification critique and recommendations for theory and research . Educational Policy, 14, 214-240.
2.
Arizona Department of Education. (2001). Annual report of the Superintendent of Public Instruction: 1999-2000. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
3.
Arizona Department of Education. (2004). Superintendent's annual report for fiscal year 2003-2004. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
4.
Arizona Revised Statutes. Charter schools; purpose; scope (Vol. §15-181).
5.
Arizona Revised Statutes. Charter schools: requirements (Vol. §15-183).
6.
Ascher, C., Jacobowitz, R., & McBride, Y. (1999). Standards-based reform and the charter school movement in 1998-1999: An analysis of four states. New York: Institute for Education and Social Policy, New York University.
7.
Bernstein, M.F. (1999). Why I'm wary of charter schools. School Administrator, 56(7), 24-28.
8.
Booker, K., Zimmer, R., & Buddin, R. (2005). The effect of charter schools on school peer composition . Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
9.
Carnoy, M., Jacobsen, R., Mishel, L., & Rothstein, R. (2005). The charter school dust-up: Examining the evidence on enrollment and achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
Carpenter, D.M.I. (2006). Playing to type: Mapping the charter school landscape . Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
11.
Center for Education Reform. (2005). Nine lies about school choice: Proving the critics wrong [Electronic version] . Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=document&documentID=825.
12.
Cobb, C.D., & Glass, G.V. (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools [Electronic version]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7, 39. Retrieved October 7, 2000, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n1/ .
13.
Finn, C.E.J., Manno, B.V., & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Fiske, E.B., & Ladd, H.F. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
15.
Frankenberg, E., & Lee, C. (2003). Charter schools and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education [Electronic version]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 23. Retrieved October 17, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n32/.
16.
Fuller, B., Gawlik, M., Gonzales, E.K., & Park, S. (2003). Localized ideas of fairness: Inequality among charter schools. In K. E. Bulkley & P. Wohlstetter (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What's happened and what's next? (pp. 93-120). New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
Garn, G. (1999). Solving the implementation problem: The case of Arizona charter schools [Electronic version]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7, 26. Retrieved August 29, 1999, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n26.html.
18.
Gill, B.P., Timpane, M.P., Ross, K.E., & Brewer, D.J. (2001). Rhetoric versus reality: What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
19.
Golden, D. (1999, September 15). Old-time religion gets a boost at a chain of charter schools. Wall Street Journal, p. 53.
20.
Goldhaber, D. (2000). School choice: Do we know enough? Educational Researcher, 29(8), 21-22.
21.
Gresham, A., Hess, F., Maranto, R., & Milliman, R. (2000). Desert bloom: Arizona's free market in education . Phi Delta Kappan, 18, 751-757.
22.
Halchin, E.L. (1999). And this parent went to market: Education as public versus private good. In R. Maranto, S. Milliman, F. Hess , & A. Gresham (Eds.), School choice in the real world: Lessons from Arizona charter schools (pp. 19-38). Boulder, CO: Westview.
23.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., Rivkin, S.G., & Branch, G.F. (2005). Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
24.
Hassel, B.C. (1999). The charter school challenge. Washington, DC: Brookings.
25.
Hill, P.T. (2002). Introduction. In P. T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 1-14). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University.
26.
Hill, P.T., & Guin, K. (2002). Baselines for assessment of choice programs. In P. T. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 15-50). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
27.
Horn, J., & Miron, G. (1999). Evaluation of the Michigan public school academy initiative: Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
28.
Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T.T., & Moser, M. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 145-158.
29.
Manno, B.V., Vanourek, G., & Finn, C.E.J. (1999). Charter schools: Serving disadvantaged youth? Education and Urban Society, 31, 429-445.
30.
McEwan, P.J. (2000). The potential impact of large-scale voucher programs . Review of Educational Research, 70, 103-149.
31.
McMillan, R.C. (1981). Religion studies and "back to basics"-Friends or foes? Educational Leadership, 38, 399-401.
32.
Medler, A. (2004). Charter schools: Complementing or competing with public education? In E. Rofes & L. M. Stulberg (Eds.), The emancipatory promise of charter schools (pp. 189-218). Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
National Charter School Research Project. ( 2005). Hopes, fears, & reality: A balanced look at American charter schools in 2005. Seattle: University of Washington.
34.
Orfield, G. (2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project.
35.
RPP International. (2000). The state of charter schools 2000: Fourth-year report. Washington, DC: Author.
36.
Schneider, M., Marschall, M., Teske, P., & Roch, C. (1998). School choice and the culture wars in the classroom: What different parents seek from education. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 489-501.
37.
Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Solomon, L.C. (2003). Findings from the 2002 survey of parents with children in Arizona charter schools: How parents grade their charter schools . Santa Monica, CA: Human Resources Policy Corporation.
39.
Stout, R.T., & Garn, G. (1999). Nothing new: Curricula in Arizona charter schools . In R. Maranto, R. Milliman, F. Hess, & A. Gresham (Eds.), School choice in the real world: Lessons from Arizona charter schools (pp. 159-172). Boulder, CO: Westview.
40.
Texas Education Agency. (2000). Texas open-enrollment charter schools: Third year evaluation, part 1. Austin, TX: Author.
41.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Choices for parents. Retrieved June 20, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/choice/index.html?src=ov.
42.
Weiher, G.R., & Tedin, K.L. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 79-92.
43.
Weiss, J.A. (1998). Policy theories of school choice. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 523-532.
44.
Wong, K.K., & Shen, F.F. (2000). Institutional effects of charter schools: Competition, innovation and segregation. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA .
