A randomized field trial involving 883 students at 23 schools in three urban cities assessed the effectiveness of Experience Corps® (EC), a program that places older adult volunteers in elementary schools to tutor students who are poor readers. Students were assessed at the beginning and end of the academic year with standardized reading measures. Program effects were analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to adjust for clustering effects. Findings demonstrated that EC students made statistically greater gains over the academic year on passage comprehension and grade-specific reading skills. The gains were stronger for students who received at least 35 tutoring sessions. These findings indicate that older community volunteers can be effectively deployed to improve reading achievement in low income, ethnic minority children who are at risk of reading failure.
BallingerG. A. (2004). Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 127-150.
2.
BinstockR. (2006). Older people and political engagement. Generations, 30(4), 24-30.
3.
BurnsM. K.SenesacB. J.SilberglittB. (2008). Longitudinal effect of a volunteer tutoring program on reading skills of students identified as at-risk for reading failure: A two-year follow-up study. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 27-37.
4.
BurnsM. K.SenesacB. J.SymingtonT. (2004). The effectiveness of the HOSTS program in improving the reading achievement of children at-risk for reading failure. Reading Research and Instruction, 43(2), 87-104.
5.
ChapmanJ. W.TunmerW. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 5-24.
6.
CheongY. F.FotiuR. P.RaudenbushS. W. (2001). Efficiency and robustness of alternative estimators for two and three-level models: The case of NAEP. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 411-429.
7.
CohenP. A.KulikJ. A.KulikC. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
8.
Corporation for National and Community Service. (2007). The health benefits of volunteering: A review of recent research. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Policy Development.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition: Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
11.
EhriL. C.DreyerL. G.FlugmanB.GrossA. (2007). Reading rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language-minority students who are struggling readers in first grade. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 414-448.
12.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM. T.MoodyS. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary school students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
13.
EybergS.PincusD. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory & Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory–Revised. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Available from http://www.parinc.com
14.
FengZ.McLerranD.GrizzleJ. (1996). A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 1793-1806.
15.
FreedmanM. (1999). The kindness of strangers: Adult mentors, urban youth, and the new volunteerism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GamseB.JacobR.HorstM.BoulayB.UnluF. (2008). Reading first impact study: Final report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
17.
GunnB.BiglanA.SmolkowskiK.AryD. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 90-103.
18.
HanleyJ. A.NegassaA.EdwardesM. D.ForresterJ. E. (2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 364-375.
19.
HoustonM. (1998). Reading coaches: Creating a session (Basic Training series). Franklin, KY: Simpson County Schools.
20.
Institute of Education Sciences. (2007). What works clearinghouse intervention report: Reading recovery. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
21.
InvernizziM.JuelC.RosemaryC. A. (1997). A community volunteer tutorial that works. Reading Teacher, 50, 304-311.
22.
KuklinskiM. R.WeinsteinR. S. (2003). Classroom and developmental differences in a path model of teacher expectancy effects. Child Development, 72, 1554-1578.
23.
LeeJ.GriggW.DonahueP. (2007). The Nation’s report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
24.
LiangK. Y.ZegerS. L. (1992). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 12-22.
25.
MeierJ.InvernizziM. (2001). Book buddies in the Bronx: Testing a model for America Reads. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6, 319-333.
26.
Morrow-HowellN.Jonson-ReidM.McCraryS.LeeY.SpitznagelE. (2009). Evaluation of Experience Corps: Student reading outcomes (CSD Research Report 09-01). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development.
27.
Morrow-HowellN.McCraryS.HongS.-I.BlinneW. (2008). Experience Corps: The volunteer experience (CSD Research Brief 08-31). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development.
28.
Morrow-HowellN.TangF. (2007). Youth service and elder service in comparative perspective. In McBrideA.SherradenM. (Eds.), Civic service worldwide (pp. 157-180). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
29.
MostellerF. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. The Future of Children: Critical Issues for Children and Youths, 5(2), 113-127.
30.
NyeB.HedgesL.KonstantopoulosS. (2000). The effects of small classes on academic achievement: The results of the Tennessee class size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 123-151.
31.
PajaresF. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 116-126.
32.
Peter D. Hart Research Associates. (2002). New faces of retirement. San Francisco: Civic Ventures.
33.
PetersT. J.RichardsS. H.BankheadC. R.AdesA. E.SterneJ. A. (2003). Comparisons of methods for analyzing cluster randomized trials: An example involving a factorial design. International Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 840-846.
34.
RebokG. W.CarlsonM. C.GlassT. A.McGillS.HillJ.WasikB. A.. (2004). Short-term impact of Experience Corps participation on children and schools: Results from a pilot randomized trial. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 81(1), 79-93.
35.
RitterG. W.DennyG. E.AlbinG. R.BarnettJ. H.BlankenshipV. L. (2006). The effectiveness of volunteer tutoring programs: A systematic review. Campbell Collaboration Reviews of Intervention and Policy evaluations (C2-RIPE). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Campbell Collaboration.
36.
RosenthalR.RubinD. B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 400-406.
37.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in survey. New York: John Wiley.
38.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.
39.
SchaferJ. L.OlsenM. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545-571.
40.
ShafferM. L.ChinchilliV. M. (2007). Including multiple imputation in a sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with treatment failures. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 28, 130-137.
41.
SlavinR. E.MaddenN. A. (2008, March 3-4). Understanding bias due to measures inherent to treatments in systematic reviews in education. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Research on Effective Education, Crystal City, VA.
42.
TorianS. (1998). Building blocks of a strong literacy project: Kansas City seniors for schools. Tutor, summer 1998, 1-4.
43.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.AbbottR. D. (2008). Effects of supplemental early reading intervention at 2-year follow up: Reading skill growth patterns and predictors. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(1), 51-89.
44.
VannemanA.HamiltonL.Baldwin-AndersonJ.RahmanT. (2009). Achievement gaps: How Black and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the national assessment of educational progress (NCES 2009-455). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
45.
WasikB. A. (1998). Volunteer tutoring programs in reading: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 266-292.
46.
WasikB. A.SlavinR. A. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five great programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 179-200.
