Off the Map? A Cartographic Glimpse into Urban Students’ Home Learning Environments

Abstract

This single case study explores the physical Home Learning Environments (HLEs) of 10 vocational students in a Brussels school with a highly diverse socioeconomic and cultural population. Data were collected through mental maps, that is, cognitive representations drawn by the participants, and a group discussion on home learning. Using the Social Theory of Space to analyze the data, three key domains, that is, resources, workspace, and indoor climate, were identified as areas where students lack optimal conditions, potentially hindering their academic performance. To address the educational divide, the study highlights the importance of educators focusing on the quality of HLEs, by gaining a deeper understanding of students’ home contexts, fostering resilience, collaborating with parents on expectations, and partnering with local organizations to provide well-equipped collective learning spaces.

Keywords

urban education multi-cultural education school improvement social justice students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar

S. J.

Galperin

Baek

Gonzalez

(2020). When school comes home: How low-income families are adapting to distance learning. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/su8wk

Andrew

Cattan

Costa Dias

Farquharson

Kraftman

Krutikova

Phimister

Sevilla

(2020). Inequalities in Children’s Experiences of Home Learning during the COVID-19 Lockdown in England*. Fiscal Studies, 41(3), 653-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12240

Aristovnik

Keržič

Ravšelj

Tomaževič

Umek

(2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438

Arnou

Cornelis

Heymans

P. J.

Leemans

Nuyens

Tondeur

Vaesen

Van Den Driessche

Elen

Valcke

(2020). Hoe creëer je thuis een krachtige leeromgeving? [How to create a powerful learning environment at home?] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340815867_Hoe_creeer_je_thuis_een_krachtige_leeromgeving

Aschenberger

F. K.

Radinger

Brachtl

Ipser

Oppl

(2023). Physical home learning environments for digitally-supported learning in academic continuing education during COVID-19 pandemic. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0

Azhari

Fajri

(2022). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: School closure in Indonesia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1934–1954. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2021.1875072

Benfield

J. A.

Rainbolt

G. N.

Bell

P. A.

Donovan

G. H.

(2015). Classrooms with nature views: Evidence of differing student perceptions and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513499583

Benson

(1988). Helping pupils overcome homework distractions. Clearing House, 61(8), 370–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1988.10113974

Brachtl

Ipser

Keser Aschenberger

Oppl

Pakoy

E. K.

Radinger

(2023). Physical home-learning environments of traditional and non-traditional students during the COVID pandemic: Exploring the impact of learning space on students’ motivation, stress and well-being. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00222-4

10.

Bradley

R. H.

Putnick

D. L.

(2012). Housing quality and access to material and learning resources within the home environment in developing countries. Child Development, 83(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01674.x

11.

Breux

Reuchamps

Loiseau

(Eds). (2011). Carte mentale et science politique: Regards et perspective critiques sur l’emploi d’un outil prometteur. P.I.E.-Peter Lang, Brussels.

12.

Bringula

Reguyal

J. J.

Tan

D. D.

Ulfa

(2021). Mathematics self-concept and challenges of learners in an online learning environment during COVID-19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00168-5

13.

Brooks

S. K.

Webster

R. K.

Smith

L. E.

Woodland

Wessely

Greenberg

Rubin

G. J.

(2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8

14.

Brown-Wright

Tyler

K. M.

Stevens-Watkins

Thomas

Mulder

Hughes

Stevens-Morgan

Roan-Belle

Gadson

Smith

L. T.

(2013). Investigating the link between home–school dissonance and academic cheating among high school students. Urban Education, 48(2), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912469203

15.

Charafeddine

Gisle

Van der Heyden

Tafforeau

(2013). Gezondheidsenquête 2013. Rapport 4: Fysieke en sociale omgeving [Health Survey 2013. Report 4: Physical and social environment]. Wetenschappelijk Instituut Volksgezondheid. https://www.sciensano.be/nl/biblio/gezondheidsenquete-2013-rapport-4-fysieke-en-sociale-omgeving

16.

Charbonnier

(2020). Covid-19: An amplifier of educational inequalities? Institut Montaigne Paris. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/blog/covid-19-amplifier-educational-inequalities

17.

Costa

A. R.

(2024). The physical dimensions of the home learning environment and its impact on young people’s learning motivations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2322862. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2322862

18.

Cummings

B. E.

Waring

M. S.

(2020). Potted plants do not improve indoor air quality: A review and analysis of reported VOC removal efficiencies. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-019-0175-9

19.

Danielski

Svensson Weimer

Lorentzen

Warne

(2022). Effects of green plants on the indoor environment and wellbeing in classrooms—A case study in a Swedish school. Sustainability, 14(7), 3777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073777

20.

Daumiller

Rinas

Schoon

Lüftenegger

(2023). How did COVID-19 affect education and what can be learned moving forward? A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/g4smq

21.

Dessouroux

Bensliman

Bernard

De Laet

Demonty

Marissal

Surkyn

(2016). Housing in Brussels: diagnosis and challenges. BSI Synopsis. https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.1353

22.

DuFour

(2021). Husserl and spatiality: A phenomenological ethnography of space. Routledge.

23.

Englert

Girès

Unger

Yannart

(2023). Welzijnsbarometer. Brussels rapport inzake armoede en sociale gezondheidsongelijkheden 2023 [Well-being barometer. Brussels report on poverty and social health inequalities 2023]. https://www.vivalis.brussels/sites/default/files/2024-03/Welzijnsbarometer-2023-NL.pdf

24.

Gregoriadis

Evangelou

(2022). Revisiting the home learning environment: Introducing the home learning ecosystem. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 47(3), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391221099370

25.

Hartas

(2012). Inequality and the home learning environment: Predictions about seven-year-olds’ language and literacy. British Educational Research Journal, 38(5), 859–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.588315

26.

Hawrot

Nusser

(2024). The home environment during the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in learning enjoyment and learning effort: A study of German lower secondary school students. Children and Youth Services Review, 158, 107481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107481

27.

Hemmerechts

Kavadias

(2018). Bijgaand rapport. Visies van stakeholders uit het Nederlandstalig Onderwijs [Additional report. Visions of stakeholders from the Dutch-speaking Brussels education sector]. Perspective Brussels.

28.

Kalenga-Mpala

(2024). De Brusselaars en de digitale wereld [The Brussels residents and the digital world]. Brussels Instituut voor statistiek en analyse. https://bisa.brussels/sites/default/files/publication/documents/ICT-Huishoudens_2024v1.pdf

29.

Katz

Csordas

T. J.

(2003). Phenomenological ethnography in sociology and anthropology. Ethnography, 4(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343001

30.

Kitchin

R. M.

(1994). Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80194-X

31.

Korsavi

S. S.

Montazami

Mumovic

(2020). The impact of indoor environment quality (IEQ) on school children’s overall comfort in the uk; a regression approach. Building and Environment, 185, 107309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107309

32.

Krousorati

Gregoriadis

Tsigilis

Grammatikopoulos

Evangelou

(2022). Introducing the Home Learning Environment Questionnaire and examining the profiles of home learning environments in Greece. Frontiers in Education, 7, 987131. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.987131

33.

Lefebvre

(1991). The production of space (1st ed.). Blackwell.

34.

Le Gales

. (2002). European cities, social conflicts and governance. Oxford University Press.

35.

Lehrl

Evangelou

Sammons

(2020). The home learning environment and its role in shaping children’s educational development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1693487

36.

Löw

Goodwin

(2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Palgrave MacMillan.

37.

McLean

E. K.

Tarnopolsky

(1977). Noise, discomfort and mental health. A review of the socio-medical implications of disturbance by noise. Psychological Medicine, 7(1), 19–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700023138

38.

Melhuish

E. C.

Phan

M. B.

Sylva

Sammons

Siraj-Blatchford

Taggart

(2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550

39.

Middleton

(2017). Henri Lefebvre on education: Critique and pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 15(4), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316676001

40.

Milner

H. R. I.

Lomotey

(2017). Handbook of urban education. Routledge.

41.

Minthorn

R. S.

Marsh

T. E.

(2016). Centering indigenous college student voices and perspectives through photovoice and photo-elicitation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 47, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.010

42.

Moodley

Seerane

Gravett

(2022). Learning at home for Grade 1 learners in disadvantaged communities: Insights from the Sandbox@Home COVID-19-response intervention. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 12(1), a1046. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v12i1.1046

43.

Nag

Vagh

S. B.

Dulay

K. M.

Snowling

Donolato

Melby-Lervåg

(2024). Home learning environments and children’s language and literacy skills: A meta-analytic review of studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Psychological Bulletin, 150(2), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000417

44.

Nampijja

Kizindo

Apule

Lule

Muhangi

Titman

Elliott

Alcock

Lewis

(2018). The role of the home environment in neurocognitive development of children living in extreme poverty and with frequent illnesses: A cross-sectional study. Wellcome Open Research, 3, 152. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14702.1

45.

Niklas

Cohrssen

Tayler

(2016). Improving preschoolers’ numerical abilities by enhancing the home numeracy environment. Early Education and Development, 27(3), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.1076676

46.

Nohl

A. M.

(2010). Narrative interview and documentary interpretation. In Bohnsack

Pfaff

Eller

(Eds.), Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international educational research (pp. 195–217). Barbara Budrich Publishers.

47.

Norlander

Moås

Archer

(2005). Noise and stress in primary and secondary school children: Noise reduction and increased concentration ability through a short but regular exercise and relaxation program. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/092434505000114173

48.

Orlove

(1993). The ethnography of maps: The cultural and social contexts of cartographic representation in Peru. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 30(1), 29–46.

49.

Paulston

R. G.

(1996). Mapping multiple perspectives (pp. 1993–1996). Research Reports of the University of Pittsburgh Social Cartography Project.

50.

Quintão

Andrade

Almeida

(2020). How to improve the validity and reliability of a case study approach? Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 9(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.v9i2.2026

51.

Reuchamps

Kavadias

Deschouwer

(2013). Drawing Belgium: Using mental maps to measure territorial conflict. Territory, Politics, Governance, 2(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2013.814549

52.

Sacco

Smits

Kavadias

Spruyt

D’Antrimont

(2016). BSI synthesenota. De Brusselse jeugd: Tussen diversiteit en kwetsbaarheid [Brussels youth: between diversity and lack of security]. Brussels Studies, 98. https://doi.org/10.4000/brussels.1345

53.

Sadrizadeh

Yao

Yuan

Awbi

Bahnfleth

Cao

Croitoru

de Dear

Haghighat

Kumar

Malayeri

Nasiri

Ruud

Sadeghian

Wargocki

Xiong

(2022). Indoor air quality and health in schools: A critical review for developing the roadmap for the future school environment. Journal of Building Engineering, 57, 104908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104908

54.

Schütze

(1983). Narrative repraesentation kollektiver schicksalsbetroffenheit. In Laemmert

(Ed.), Erzaehlforschung [A narrative depiction of shared destiny] (pp. 568–590). J.B. Metzler.

55.

Sincer

Severiens

Volman

(2019). Teaching diversity in citizenship education: Context-related teacher understandings and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.015

56.

Spruyt

Van Droogenbroeck

Siongers

Kavadias

(2022–2023, September–Oktober). Het lerarentekort kritisch bekeken vanuit internationaal vergelijkend perspectief [A critical examination of the teacher shortage from an international comparative perspective]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsrecht en Onderwijsbeleid, 2022-2023(september-oktober), 19–27.

57.

Statbel. (2023). Key figures 2023. An overview of Belgium with figures. https://statbel.fgov.be/en/news/key-figures-2023

58.

Strife

Downey

(2009). Childhood development and access to nature: A new direction for environmental inequality research. Organization & Environment, 22(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026609333340

59.

Strijbos

Engels

(2024). A multifaceted portrait of students’ connectedness to urban schools. Urban Education, 59(5), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221081769

60.

Tamis-Le Monda

C. S.

Luo

McFadden

K. E.

Bandel

E. T.

Vallotton

. (2019). Early home learning environment predicts children’s 5th grade academic skills. Applied Developmental Science, 23(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1345634

61.

Toth

Sammons

Sylva

Melhuish

Siraj

Taggart

(2020). Home learning environment across time: The role of early years HLE and background in predicting HLE at later ages. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1618348

62.

Tsibiridou

(2018). An ethnography of space, creative dissent and reflective nostalgia in the city centre of Global Istanbul. In Pardo

Prato

(Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of urban ethnography (pp. 405–426). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64289-5_23

63.

van Den Berg

A. E.

Wesselius

J. E.

Maas

Tanja-Dijkstra

. (2017). Green walls for a restorative classroom environment: A controlled evaluation study. Environment and Behavior, 49(7), 791–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516667976

64.

Vandermotten

(2014). Bruxelles, une lecture de la ville. De L’Europe des marchands à la capitale de l’Europe [Brussels, a reading of the city. From the Europe of merchants to the capital of Europe]. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Collection UBlire.

65.

Van Lancker

Parolin

. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. Lancet Public Health, 5(5), e243–e244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0

66.

Volk

(2021). Constructing literacy spaces in low-income homes and communities: A study of two Latino first graders and their families. Urban Education, 56(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916677348

67.

Wiedmann

Salama

A. M.

(2019). Mapping Lefebvre’s theory on the production of space to an integrated approach for sustainable urbanism. In Leary-Owhin

M. E.

McCarthy

J. P. (Red)

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Henri Lefebvre, the city and urban society (1st ed., pp. 346–354). Routledge.

68.

Wirth

Stadler

Birtwistle

Niklas

(2022). New directions in the conceptualization and operationalization of the home learning environment. Journal of Education & Psychology, 115(1), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000749

69.

Xiong

Huang

Mao

Wang

Tang

(2018). Impact of indoor physical environment on learning efficiency in different types of tasks: A 3 × 4 × 3 full factorial design analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061256

70.

Yang

Zhao

Tian

Xing

(2021). Effects of environment and posture on the concentration and achievement of students in mobile learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1707692

71.

Yates

Starkey

Egerton

Flueggen

(2021). High school students’ experience of online learning during Covid-19: The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337

72.

Yeo

L. B.

(2020). Psychological and physiological benefits of plants in the indoor environment: A mini and in-depth review. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 8(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v8.n1.597

73.

Yin

R. K.

(2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.