Background: A growing literature is questioning the appropriateness of a research dissertation for practitioners in education doctoral programs. Although this literature persuasively critiques the prevailing theory-research orientation of most programs and theses, it goes little beyond exhorting change and describing extant alternatives in a few programs. There is little attention in this literature to the powerful structures and values holding in place the traditional research dissertation. This literature has not examined in-depth distinctions between research and organizational problem solving and the implications for an alternative thesis design for education leadership doctorates.
Findings: This article presents four “qualities of acceptability” that alternatives to the traditional research thesis must address: (a) developmental efficacy, (b) community benefit, (c) stewardship of doctoral values, and (d) distinctiveness of design. The author comments on existing proposals from the standpoint of this framework, noting their strengths and shortcomings; elaborates on five key distinctions between research and organizational problem solving; presents theory and research supporting a thesis based on organizational problem solving; and proposes a specific and distinctive thesis design.
Adams, G., & White, J. (1994, November/December). Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: An assessment of methods and quality. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 565-576.
2.
Alana, J., Milenkiewicz, M., & Bucknam, A. (2008). Participatory action research for educational leadership: Using data-driven decision making to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Allison, D., & Allison, P. (1993). Both ends of a telescope: Experience and expertise in principal problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly , 29(3), 302-332.
4.
Anderson, G., & Jones, F. (2000, August). Knowledge generation in educational administration from the inside out: The promise and perils of site-based, administrator research . Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 428-464.
5.
Andrews, R., & Grogan, M. (2005, spring). Form should follow function: Removing the EdD dissertation from the Ph.D. straight jacket. UCEA Review, pp. 10-12.
6.
Archer, J. (2005, December 14). Some EdD programs adopting practical approach. Education Week, p. 8.
7.
Armstrong, J. (1994). Rethinking the Ph.D. Issues in Science and Technology, 10(4), 19-23.
8.
Association of American Universities. (1998 ). Report and recommendations from the committee on graduate education. Washington, DC: Author . Retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/reports/GradEdRpt.html
9.
Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Bell, D., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (1988). Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the US. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Berliner, D. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5-13.
13.
Bernhardt, V. (2004). Data analysis for continuous school improvement . Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education .
14.
Bieber, J.P., & Worley, L. (2006, November/December). Conceptualizing the academic life: Graduate students' perspectives. Journal of Higher Education , 77(6), 1009-1035.
15.
Bolker, J. (1998). Writing your dissertation in fifteen minutes a day: A guide to starting, revising and finishing your doctoral thesis. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
16.
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1991). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Borman, G. (2002). Experiments for educational evaluation and improvement . Peabody Journal of Education, 77(4), 7-27.
18.
Boudett, K., City, E. , & Murnane, R. (Eds.). (2005). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA : Harvard Education Press.
19.
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate . New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement for Teaching.
20.
Bransford, J. (1993). Who ya gonna call? Thoughts about teaching problem-solving . In P. Hallinger, K. Leithwood, & J. Murphy (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on education leadership (pp. 171-191). New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
Braxton, J. (2005, winter). Reflections on a scholarship of practice . The Review of Higher Education, 28(2), 285-293.
22.
Brenninkmeyer, L.D., & Spillane, J.P. (2004, April). Instructional leadership: How expertise and subject matter influence problem solving strategy. Paper presented at the 2004 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego.
23.
Bridges, E., & Hallinger, P. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in leadership development. Eugene: University of Oregon, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
24.
Brooks, P. (1996, December 20). Graduate learning as apprenticeship . The Chronicle of Higher Education, 43, A52.
25.
Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989, January/February). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
26.
Bruckerhoff, C. (2000, March). National survey concerning implementing the Ed.D program. Commissioned by Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, under direction of Professor James Fullmer, Committee Chairman, Department of Earth Sciences, Southern Connecticut State University .
27.
Buyukdamgaci, G. (2003, August). Process of organizational problem definition: How to evaluate and how to improve. Omega, 31(4), 327-239.
28.
Cambron-McCabe, N., & McCarthy, M. (2005). Educating school leaders for social justice. Educational Policy, 19(1), 201-222.
29.
Carnegie Foundation. (2003). Summary of doctoral education literature in education (Working Paper of the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate). Menlo Park, CA: Author.
30.
Cherwitz, R., & Sullivan, C. (2002, November/December). Intellectual entrepreneurship: A vision for graduate education. Change, 34(6), 22-27.
31.
Clifford, G.J., & Guthrie, J.W. (1988). Ed school: A brief for professional education . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Cone, J., & Foster, S. (1993). Dissertations and theses from start to finish: Psychology and related fields. Washington, DC: APA Books.
33.
Connolly, T., Arkes, H., & Hammond, K. (Eds.). (2000). Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Cooley, W., & Bickel, W. (1986). Decision-oriented educational research. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
35.
Copland, M. (2003a, September). Developing principals' problem-framing skills. Journal of School Leadership, 13, 539-548.
36.
Copland, M. (2003b). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375-395.
37.
Council of Graduate Schools. (1990). The doctor of philosophy degree: A policy statement. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Crayton, L. (2005). A case study of early literacy routines in a kindergarten classroom: A sociocultural perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
39.
Cuban, L. (1990). Problem-finding: Problem-based learning project . Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School of Education.
40.
Cuban, L. (2001). How can I fix it? Finding solutions and managing dilemmas. New York: Teacher's College Press.
41.
Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., & Orr, M. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Executive summary. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
42.
Deering, T.E. (1998). Eliminating the doctor of education degree: It's the right thing to do. Educational Forum, 62(3), 243-248.
43.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a "professional learning community?" Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
44.
Duke, D., & Beck, S. (1999, April). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertationEducational Researcher, 28(3), 31-36.
45.
Erickson, J., Howard, R., Borland, K., & Baker, L. (2004). Full-time leaders: Part-time learners. Doctoral programs of administrators with multiple priorities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
46.
Fairweather, J.S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
47.
Fairweather, J.S. (2005, July/August). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 401-423.
48.
Fenwick T.J. (2002, May). Problem-based learning, group process and the mid-career professional: Implications for graduate education. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 5-22.
49.
Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, W. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
Gardner, S., Hayes, M., & Neider, X. (2007). The dispositions and skills of a Ph.D. in education: Perspectives of faculty and graduate students in one college of education . Innovative Higher Education, 31(5), 287-299.
51.
Gaynor, A. (1998). Analyzing problems in schools and school systems: A theoretical approach. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Gijselaers, W. (1996, winter). Connecting problem-based practices with educational theory. In L. Wilkerson & W. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (pp. 13-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Golde, C., Bueschel, A., Jones, L., & Walkern, G. (2006). Apprenticeship and intellectual community: Lessons from the Carnegie initiative on the doctorate. New York : Carnegie Foundation.
54.
Golde, C.M., & Dore, T.M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia : Pew Charitable Trusts.
55.
Golde, C., Walker, G., & Associates. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56.
Goldring, E., & Sims, P. (2005). Modeling creative and courageous school leadership through district-community-university partnerships. Educational Policy, 19(1), 223-249.
57.
Grogan, M., & Andrews, R. (2002, April). Defining preparation and professional development for the future. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 233-256.
58.
Hale, E., & Moorman, H. (2003). Preparing school leaders. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership .
59.
Haller, E.J., & Strike, K. (1997). An introduction to educational administration . Troy, NY: Educator's International Press.
60.
Hampel, R., & Kleine-Kracht, P. (1995). Repositioning the position papers. Innovative Higher Education, 20(1), 33-43.
61.
Hart, A. (1993). Reflection: An instructional strategy in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(3), 339-363.
62.
Hendrick, C. (2006). Improving schools through action research. Boston: Pearson.
63.
Hess, F., & Kelly, A. (2005). An innovative look, a recalcitrant reality: The politics of principal preparation reform. Educational Policy , 19(1), 155-180.
64.
Hmelo, C.E. (1998). Problem-based learning: Effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. Journal of the Learning Sciences , 7, 173-208.
65.
Hoffman, L., & Burrello, L. (2004). A case study illustration of how a critical theorist and a consummate practitioner meet on common ground. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(2), 268-289.
66.
Hogarth, J. (1980). Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision . Chichester, UK: Wiley.
67.
Huba, M., Schub, J., & Shelley, M. (2006). Recasting doctoral education in an outcomes-based framework. In P. Maki & N. Borkowski (Eds.), The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes (pp. 239-272). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
68.
Hung, D. (2005, winter). Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning and instruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393-415.
69.
Isaac, P., Quinlan, S., & Walker, M. (1992, May/June). Faculty perceptions of the doctoral dissertation. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(3), 241-268.
70.
Isenberg, D. (1988). How senior managers think. In D. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 525-539). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Jackson, B., & Kelley, C. (2002, April). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly , 38(2), 192-212.
72.
Jacobson, S.L. (1996). School leadership in an age of reform: New directions in principal preparation. International Journal of Education Reform, 6(8), 33-42.
73.
Johnson, B., & Christenson, L. (2000). Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
74.
Kepner, C., & Tregoe, B. (1997). The new rational manager. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Research Press.
75.
Kochan, F., Jackson, B., & Duke, D. (1999). A thousand voices from the firing line: A study of educational leaders, their jobs, and the problems they face. Columbia, MO: The University Council for Educational Administration.
76.
Kowalski, T. (2005). Case studies in educational administration. Boston: Pearson.
77.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Coffin, G., & Wilson, P. (1996). Preparing school leaders: What works? Journal of School Leadership, 6(3), 316-342.
78.
Leithwood, K., & Stager, M. (1986). Differences in problem-solving processes used by moderately and highly effective principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
79.
Leithwood, K., & Stager, M. (1989). Expertise in principal's problem-solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(2), 121-161.
80.
Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1995). Expert problem solving: Evidence from school and district leaders. Albany: State University of New York Press.
81.
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: Columbia University Teachers' College, The Education Schools Project.
82.
Madsen, D. (1991). Successful dissertations and theses (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83.
Malen, B., & Prestine, N. (2005, spring). The case for revitalizing the dissertation . UCEA Review, pp. 7-9.
84.
March, J.G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen . New York: Free Press.
85.
Massy, W.F., & Zemsky, R. (1994). Faculty discretionary time: Departments and the academic ratchet. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 1-22.
86.
McCarthy, M. (1999). The evolution of educational leadership preparation programs. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 119-139). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87.
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghari, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of "unstructured" decision processes . Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246-275.
88.
Mosteller, F., & Boruch, R. (Eds.). (2002). Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
89.
Murphy, J. (1995). Rethinking the foundations of leadership preparation: Insights from school improvement efforts. DESIGN for Leadership: The Bulletin of the National Policy Board for Educational Administration, 6(1).
90.
Murphy, J. (2006). Preparing school leaders: Defining a research and action agenda. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
91.
Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2005). Developing professionally anchored dissertations . School Leadership Review, 1(1), 33-57.
92.
National Council for Graduate Studies. (NCGS). ( 1991). Role and nature of the doctoral dissertation: A policy statement. Washington, DC: Council for Graduate Schools in the United States, One Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 430, 20036-1173. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 331 422)
93.
Nelson, J.K., & Coorough, C. (1994). Content analysis of the PhD versus EdD dissertations . Journal of Experimental Education, 62(2), 158-168.
94.
Noble, K.A. (1994). Changing doctoral degrees: An international perspective . Bristol, PA: Open University Press .
95.
Nyquist, J. (2002, November/December). The PhD: A tapestry of change for the 21st century. Change, pp. 13-20.
96.
Oakes, J., & Rogers, J. (2001). The public responsibility of public schools of education. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Faculty work in schools of education: Rethinking roles and rewards for the twenty-first century (pp. 9-27). Albany: State University of New York Press.
97.
O'Brien, P. (1995). The reform of the doctoral dissertations in humanities and social studies. Harvard Education Review, 28(1), 3-19.
98.
Ormord J.E. (1995). Human learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
99.
Orr, M. (2006). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nation's schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(7), 492-499.
100.
Osguthorpe, R.T., & Wong, M.J. (1993). The Ph.D. versus the EdD: Time for a decision . Innovative Higher Education, 18(1), 47-63.
101.
Paris, S.G., & Turner, J.C. (1995). Situated motivation. In P. Pintrich (Ed.), Student motivation and cognition (pp. 213-237). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
102.
Pisapia, J., Reyes-Guerra, D., & Coukos-Semmel, E. (2005, spring). Developing the leader's strategic mindset: Establishing the measures. Leadership Review, 5, 41-68.
103.
Prawat, R. (1991, March). The value of ideas: The immersion approach to the development of thinking. Educational Researcher, 20(2), 3-10.
104.
Reybold, L.E. (2003, summer). Pathways to the professorate: The development of faculty identity in education. Innovative Higher Education , 27(4), 235-252.
105.
Richardson, V. (2003). The PhD in education. In C. Golde, A. Bueschel, L. Jones, & G. Walkern (Eds.), Apprenticeship and intellectual community: Lessons from the Carnegie initiative on the doctorate. New York : Carnegie Foundation.
106.
Richardson, V. (2006). Stewards of a field, stewards of an enterprise . In C. Golde, A. Walker, & Associates (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education (pp. 251-267). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
107.
Richetti, C., & Tregoe, B. (2001). Analytical processes for school leaders. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
108.
Riehl, C., Larson, C., Short, P., & Reitzug, U. (2000, August). Reconceptualizing research and scholarship in educational administration: Learning to know, knowing to do, doing to learn . Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 391-427.
109.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
110.
Rochefort, D., & Cobb, D. (1994). (Eds.). Problem definition: An emerging perspective. In D. Rochefort & D. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda (pp. 1-31). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
111.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
112.
Schwenk, C.R. (1988). The cognitive perspective on strategic decision-making . Journal of Management Studies, 25(1), 45-56.
113.
Shavelson, R., & Towne, L. (Ed.). (2002). Scientific research in education: Committee on scientific principles for education researchWashington, DC: Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academy Press.
114.
Shulman, L., Golde, C., Bueschel, A., & Garabedian, K. (2006, April). Reclaiming education's doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher , pp. 25-32.
115.
Sims, B. (2006). A bridge over troubled waters: Promoting self-regulated learning in first-year college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Michigan.
116.
Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
117.
Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221-258.
118.
Thwing, C.F. (1928). The American and the German university. New York: Macmillan.
119.
Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (1998, December). Collegiality in schools: Its nature and implications for problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 608-629.
120.
Toma, J.D. (2002, November 21-24). Legitimacy, differentiation, and the promise of the EdD in higher education. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education , Sacramento, CA.
121.
Townsend, B. (2002, November 21-24). Rethinking the EdD or what's in a name?Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA.
122.
Trow, M.A. (1984). The analysis of status. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), Perspectives on higher education. Berkeley: University California Press.
123.
Tucker, M. S., & Codding, J. B. (Eds.). (2002). The principal challenge: Leading and managing schools in an era of accountability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
124.
Van Berkel, H., & Schmidt, H. (2000, September). Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning. Higher Education , 40, 231-243.
125.
Veldman, D. (1971). Writing a thesis or dissertation proposal in the behavioral sciences. Fort Worth, TX: American Continental Publishing Company.
126.
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
127.
Weidman, J.C., Twale, D., & Stein, E. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
128.
Woods, P., Bennett, N., Harvey, J., & Wise, C. (2004). Variabilities and dualities in distributed leadership: Findings from a systematic literature review. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32(4), 439-457.
