Angus, L. (1989). "New" leadership and the possibility of educational reform. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 63-92). Philadelphia: Falmer.
2.
Bates, R. J. (1987). Corporate culture, schooling, and educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 79-115.
3.
Bolman, L. G. , & Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Clark, C. , & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
5.
Deal, T. E. , & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate culture: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
7.
Reitzug, U. C. (1994a). A case study of empowering principal behavior.American Educational Research Journal, 31(2).
8.
Reitzug, U. C. (1994b). Diversity, power, and influence: Multiple perspectives on the ethics of school leadership.Journal of School Leadership, 4(2), 197-222.
9.
Reitzug, U. C. , & Reeves, J. E. (1992). "Miss Lincoln doesn't teach here": A descriptive narrative and conceptual analysis of a principal's symbolic leadership behavior.Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 185-219.
10.
Ross, E. W. , Cornett, J. W., &McCutcheon, G. (1992). Teacher personal theorizing: Connecting curriculum practice, theory, and research. Albany: SUNY Press.
11.
Smyth, J. (1991). Teachers as collaborative learners: Challenging dominant forms of supervision. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
