Invalid Response Sets in MMPI and MMPI-2 Profiles of College Students

Abstract

Undergraduates (63 men, 68 women) were administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and MMPI-2 in counterbalanced order, 1 week apart, to examine invalid response sets in the MMPI versus the MMPI-2, in research volunteers. A number of participants had clinically significant elevations on Infrequency (F) and Back F (Fb). Examination of Variable Response Inconsistency (VRIN), True Response Inconsistency (TRIN), and the new Infrequency-Psychopathology [F(p)] scale suggested elevations were due to endorsing highly infrequent items rather than random responding or psychopathology. When the profiles were rated for goodness-of-fit to six modal-invalid profile types, a number of profiles were possibly invalid. Gender differences were observed but few differences between the MMPI and MMPI-2 were found. However, the additional MMPI-2 validity scales and the F(p) scale improve detection of invalid response sets. Demographic and motivational factors, and recommendations for obtaining valid results from undergraduate volunteers, are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amir, Y. , & Sharon, I. (1987). Are social psychological laws cross-culturally valid? Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 18(4), 383-470.

Arbisi, P. A. , & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995).An MMPI-2 infrequent response scale for use with psychopathological populations: The infrequency-psychopathology scale, F(p). Psychological Assessment, 7,424-431.

Butcher, J. N. , Dahlstrom, W. G. , Graham, J. R. , Tellegen, A. , & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Manual for administration and scoring: MMPI-2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Butcher, J. N. , Graham, J. R. , Dahlstrom, W. G. , & Bowman, E. (1990).The MMPI-2 with college students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54,1-15.

Butcher, J. N. , & Williams, C. L. (1992). Essentials of MMPI-2 and MMPI-A interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Gallen, R. T. , & Berry, D.T.R. (1996). Detection of random responding in MMPI-2 protocols. Assessment, 3(2), 171-178.

Gasquoine, P. G. (1997).American psychological imperialism in the fourth world. American Psychologist, 52,570-571.

Graham, J. R. (1987). The MMPI: A practical guide (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Graham, J. R. (1990). The MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology. New York: Oxford Press.

10.

Graham, J. R. (1993). The MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology. New York: Oxford Press.

11.

Hathaway, S. R. , & McKinley, J. C. (1943). Manual for administration and scoring: MMPI. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

12.

Lim, J. , & Butcher, J. N. (1996).Detection of faking bad on the MMPI-2: Differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67,1-25.

13.

Roche, B. A. , Moore, J. , & Gordon, D. A. (1987).Assessment of interpersonal functions: Developing measures to aid the functional family therapist. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13,365-373.

14.

Sanderman, R. , Eysenck, S. B. , & Arrindell, W. A. (1991).Cross-cultural comparisons of personality: The Netherlands and England. Psychological Reports, 69,1091-1096.

15.

Sieber, J. E. , & Saks, M. J. (1989).A census of subject pool characteristics and policies. American Psychologist, 44,1053-1061.

16.

Vincent, K. R. (1990).The fragile nature of MMPI code types. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46,800-802.