Areliability generalization of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) was conducted using the normative sample. The RCMAS consists of a Total Anxiety scale as well as four subscales. Results suggest that the Total Anxiety scores are typically reliable (median • across 48 samples = .81). Subscale scores were less reliable: The median • coefficients were .61 for the Physiological subscale, .63 for the Concentration subscale, .77 for theWorry& Oversensitivity subscale, and .72 for the Lie subscale. Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that score variability, age, race, and mean score were statistically significant predictors of reliability across scales although effects were variable and often, but not always, small. The predictive power of score variability is consistent with psychometric theory, but focused psychometric analyses are needed to isolate the unique and interactive impact of age, race, and mean score on RCMAS scale score reliability estimates, especially the Lie subscale.
Argulewicz, E. N., Abel, R. R., & Schuster, S. A. (1985). Reliability and content validity of the children's anxiety scale for Anglo-American and Mexican-American kindergarten children. School Psychology Review, 14, 236-238.
2.
Caruso, J. C. (2000). Reliability generalization of the NEO Personality Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement60, 236-254.
3.
Caruso, J. C.,& Edwards, S. (2001). Reliability generalization of the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 173-184.
4.
Caruso, J. C., Witkiewitz, K., Gottleib, J., & Belcourt-Dittloff, A. (2001). Reliability of scores from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 675-689.
5.
Castaneda, A., Palermo, D. S.,& McCandless, B. R. (1956). Complex learning and performance as a function of anxiety in children and task difficulty. Child Development, 27, 327-332.
6.
Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
8.
Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R.,& Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 404-420.
9.
Hersov, L. (1985). Emotional disorders. In M. Rutter & L. Hersov (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
10.
Hoehn-Saric, E., Maisami, M., & Wiegand, D. (1986). Measurement of anxiety in children and adolescents using semistructured interviews. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 541-545.
11.
Lord, F. M.,& Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental text scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
March, J. S.,& Albano, A. M. (1996). Assessment of anxiety in children and adolescents. American Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiatry, 15, 405-427.
13.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory(3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Reynolds, C. R., & Paget, K. D. (1983). National normative and reliability data for the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. School Psychology Review, 12, 324-336.
15.
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond B. O. (1985). Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
16.
Rowley, G. L. (1976). The reliability of observational measures. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 51-59.
17.
Shields, A. L., & Caruso, J. C. (2003). Reliability generalization of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 404-413.
18.
Shields, A. L.,& Caruso, J. C. (2004). Areliability induction and reliability generalization study of the CAGE questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 254-270.
19.
Thompson, B.,& Cook, C. (2002). Stability of the reliability of the LibQUAL+™ scores: Areliability generalization meta-analysis study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 735-743.
20.
Vacha-Haase, T. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 58, 6-20.
21.
Vacha-Haase, T., Henson, R.,& Caruso, J. C. (2002). Reliability generalization: Moving toward improved understanding and use of score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 562-569.
22.
Vacha-Haase, T., Tani, C. R., Kogan, L. R., Woodall, R. A., & Thompson, B. (2001). Reliability generalization: Exploring reliability variations on MMPI/MMPI-2 validity scale scores. Assessment, 8, 391-401.
23.
Viswesvaran, C.,& Ones, D. S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five Factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 224-235.
24.
Wilkinson, L., & American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.
25.
Yin, P., & Fan, X. (2000). Assessing the reliability of Beck Depression Inventory scores: Reliability generalization across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 201-223.
