The present simulation investigated the performance of parallel analysis for unidimensional binary data. Single-factor models with 8 and 20 indicators were examined, and sample size (50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000), factor loading (.45, .70, and .90), response ratio on two categories (50/50, 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10), and types of correlation coefficients (phi and tetrachoric correlations) were manipulated. The results indicated that parallel analysis performed well in identifying the number of factors. The performance improved as factor loading and sample size increased and as the percentages of responses on two categories became close. Using the 95th and 99th percentiles of the random data eigenvalues as the criteria for comparison in parallel analysis yielded higher correct rate than using mean eigenvalues.
Allen, S. J., & Hubbard, R. (1986). Regression equations for the latent roots of random data correlation matrices with unities on the diagonal. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 393-398.
2.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
3.
Bernstein, I. H., & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467-477.
4.
Budescu, D. V., Cohen, Y., & Ben-Simon, A. (1997). A revised modified parallel analysis for the construction of unidimensional item pools. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 233-252.
5.
Buja, A., & Eyuboglu, N. (1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 509-540.
6.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Collins, L. M., Cliff, N., McCormick, D. J., & Zatkin, J. L. (1986). Factor recovery in binary data sets: A simulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 377-391.
8.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Cota, A. A., Longman, R. S., Holden, R. R., Fekken, G. C., & Xinaris, S. (1993). Interpolating 95th percentile eigenvalues from random data: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 585-596.
10.
Drasgow, F., & Lissak, R. I. (1983). Modified parallel analysis: A procedure for examining the latent dimensionality of dichotomously scored item responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 363-373.
11.
Enzmann, D. (1997). RanEigen: A program to determine the parallel analysis criterion for the number of principal components. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 232.
12.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
13.
Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291-314.
14.
Glorfeld, L. W. (1995). An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 377-393.
15.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Green, S. B. (1983). Identifiability of spurious factors using linear factor analysis with binary items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 139-147.
17.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis (3rded.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 1179-1185.
19.
Humphreys, L. G., & Ilgen, D. (1969). Note on a criterion for the number of common factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 571-578.
20.
Humphreys, L. G., & Montanelli, R. G., Jr. (1975). An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 193-205.
21.
Kaufman, J. D., & Dunlap, W. P. (2000). Determining the number of factors to retain: A Windows-based FORTRAN-IMSL program for parallel analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 389-395.
22.
Keeling, K. B. (2000). A regression equation for determining the dimensionality of data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 457-468.
23.
Lautenschlager, G. J. (1989a). A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 365-395
24.
Lautenschlager, G. J. (1989b). PARANAL.TOK: A program for developing parallel analysis criteria. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 176.
25.
Lautenschlager, G. J., Lance, C. E., & Flaherty, V. L. (1989). Parallel analysis criteria: Revised equations for estimating the latent roots of random data correlation matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 339-345.
26.
Longman, R. S., Cota, A. A., Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1989a). PAM: A double-precision FORTRAN routine for the parallel analysis method in principal components analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 477-480.
27.
Longman, R. S., Cota, A. A., Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1989b). A regression equation for the parallel analysis criterion in principal components analysis: Mean and 95th percentile eigenvalues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 59-69.
28.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
29.
Montanelli, R. G., Jr., & Humphreys, L. G. (1976). Latent roots of random data correlation matrices with squared multiple correlations on the diagonal: A Monte Carlo study. Psychometrika, 41, 341-348.
30.
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396-402.
31.
Parry, C. D. H., & McArdle, J. J. (1991). An applied comparison of methods for least-squares factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 35-46.
32.
Reilly, A., & Eaves, R. C. (2000). Factor analysis of the Minnesota Infant Development Inventory based on a Hispanic migrant population. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 271-285.
33.
Roznowski, M., Tucker, L. R., & Humphreys, L. G. (1991). Three approaches to determining the dimensionality of binary items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 109-127.
34.
Sarff, P. L. (1997). Using factor replicability to evaluate number of factors rules. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 58(4-B), 2175.
35.
SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS/IML user’s guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: Author.
36.
Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytical evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
37.
Turner, N. E. (1998). The effect of common variance and structure pattern on random data eigenvalues: Implications for the accuracy of parallel analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 541-568.
38.
Velicer, W. F., Eaton, C. A., & Fava, J. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-71). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
39.
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.
40.
Wang, C.-N. (2001). Effect of number of response categories and scale distribution on factor analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
41.
Wang, C.-N., & Weng, L.-J. (2002). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in Taiwan: 1993-1999. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 44, 239-251.
42.
Weng, L.-J. (1995). An overview of applications of factor analysis. In Y.-H. Chang, Y.-C. Fu, & H.-Y. Chiu (Eds.), Social survey and analysis: The first interdisciplinary symposium on research methods in the social sciences (pp. 245-265). Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
43.
Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256-293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.
