This article reports on the development of a short questionnaire to measure work engagement—a positive work-related state of fulfillment that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption. Data were collected in 10 different countries (N = 14,521), and results indicated that the original 17-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) can be shortened to 9 items (UWES-9). The factorial validity of the UWES-9 was demonstrated using confirmatory factor analyses, and the three scale scores have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Furthermore, a two-factor model with a reduced Burnout factor (including exhaustion and cynicism) and an expanded Engagement factor (including vigor, dedication, absorption, and professional efficacy) fit best to the data. These results confirm that work engagement may be conceived as the positive antipode of burnout. It is concluded that the UWES-9 scores has acceptable psychometric properties and that the instrument can be used in studies on positive organizational behavior.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1997).Amos users'guide (Version 4.0). Chicago: Smallwaters.
2.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey: An Internet study. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 15, 245-260.
3.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models.Psychological Bulletin,107, 238-246.
4.
Bouman, A. M., Te Brake, H., & Hoogstraten, J. (2002). Significant effects due to rephrasing the Maslach Burnout Inventory's personal accomplishment items.Psychological Reports,91, 825-826.
5.
Cohen, J. (1969).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Courville, T., & Thompson, B. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression arti cles: β is not enough.Educational and Psychological Measurement,61, 229-248.
7.
Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. Scott Long (Eds.),Testing structural equation models (pp. 1-9). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Janssen, P. P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control.Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environment and Heath,27, 279-286.
9.
Durán, A., Extremera, N., & Rey, L. (2004). Engagement and burnout: Analysing their association patterns. Psychological Reports,94, 1048-1050.
10.
Green, D. E., Walkey, F. H., & Taylor, A. J. W. (1991). The three-factor structure of the Maslach Burnout Inventory.Journal of Science Behavior and Personality,6, 453-472.
11.
Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,34, 177-189.
12.
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.),Structural equation modeling, concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6, 1-55.
14.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986).LISREL user guide version VI (4th ed.). Mooresville, IL: Scientific Software International.
15.
Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout.Journal of Applied Psychology,81, 123-133.
16.
Leiter, M. P. (1993). Burnout as a developmental process: Consideration of models. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marek (Eds.),Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research(pp. 237-250). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
17.
Leiter, M. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1996). Consistency of the burnout construct across occupations.Anxiety, Stress & Coping,9, 229-243.
18.
Luthans, F. (2002).The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior,23, 695-706.
19.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.),Advanced structural equation modeling, issues and techniques (pp. 315-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996).Maslach Burnout Inventory—Manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
21.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997).The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout.Annual Review of Psychology,52, 397-422.
23.
Montgomery, A., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Den Ouden, M. (2003). Work-home interference among newspaper managers: Its relationship with burnout and engagement.Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 16, 195-211.
24.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994).Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Llorens, S., Peiró, J. M., & Grau, R. (2001). Desde el “burnout” al “engamement”: una nueva perspective [From “burnout” to “engagement”: A new perspective].Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones,16, 117-134.
26.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Test manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.schaufeli.com
27.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study.Journal of Organizational Behavior,25, 293-315.
28.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Enzmann, D. (1998).The burnout companion to study and research: A critical analysis. London: Taylor & Francis.
29.
Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory—General Survey. In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.),Maslach Burnout Inventory—Test manual(3rd ed., pp. 22-26). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
30.
Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I., Marques-Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross national study.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,33, 464-481.
31.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (in press). Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.),Research in social issues in management: Vol. 5. Managing social and ethical issues in organizations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
32.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach.Journal of Happiness Studies,3, 71-92.
33.
Schutte, N., Toppinnen, S., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2000). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory–General Survey across occupational groups and nations.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,73, 53-66.
34.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction.American Psychologist,55, 5-14.
35.
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between non-work and work.Journal of Applied Psychology,88, 518-528.
36.
Storm, K., & Rothmann, I. (2003). A psychometric analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in the South African police service.South African Journal of Industrial Psychology,29, 62-70.
37.
Taris, T. W., Bok, I. A., & Meijer, Z. Y. (1998). Assessing stability and change of psychometric properties of multi-item concepts across different situation: A general approach.Journal of Psychology,123, 301-316.
