Factor analysis was applied to the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) scores of 432 Pennsylvania students referred for evaluation for special education services to determine the factor structure of the WISC-IV with this population. A first-order, four-factor oblique solution that mirrored that found in the WISC-IV normative sample was supported. When transformed to an orthogonalized higher order model, the general factor accounted for the greatest amount of common (75.7%) and total (46.7%) variance. In contrast, the largest contribution by a first-order factor (Verbal Comprehension) was 6.5% of total variance. It was recommended that interpretation of the WISC-IV not discount the strong general factor.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A further note on the multiplying factors for various [.chi]2 approximations in factor analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296-298.
3.
Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 10-22.
4.
Briggs, N. E., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Recovery of weak common factors by maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 25-56.
5.
Browne, M. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111-150.
6.
Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (1998). Long-term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition. Psychological Assessment, 10, 285-291.
7.
Carretta, T. R., & Ree, J. J. (2001). Pitfalls of ability research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 325-335.
8.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Carroll, J. B. (1995). On methodology in the study of cognitive abilities. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 429-452.
10.
Carroll, J. B. (1997). Theoretical and technical issues in identifying a factor of general intelligence. In B. Devlin, S. E. Fienberg, D. P. Resnick, & K. Roeder (Eds.), Intelligence, genes, and success: Scientists respond to the Bell Curve (pp. 125-156). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Carroll, J. B. (2003). The higher-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: Current evidence supports g and about ten broad factors. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (pp. 5-21). New York: Pergamon.
12.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
13.
Goldberg, L. R., & Velicer, W. F. (in press). Principles of exploratory factor analysis. In S. Strack (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
14.
Gorsuch, R. L. (2003). Factor analysis. In J. A. Schinka & F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 143-164). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
15.
Gustafsson, J.-E. (1994). Hierarchical models of intelligence and educational achievement. In A. Demetriou and A. Efklides (Eds.), Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: Structure and development(pp. 45-73). New York: Elsevier.
16.
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (in press). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
17.
Horn, J. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
18.
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
19.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
20.
Kamphaus, R. W., Petoskey, M. D., & Rowe, E. W. (2000). Current trends in psychological testing of children. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 155-164.
21.
Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
22.
McClain, A. L. (1996). Hierarchical analytic methods that yield different perspectives on dynamics: Aids to interpretation. Advances in Social Science Methodology, 4, 229-240.
23.
Messick, S. (2000). Consequences of test interpretation and use: The fusion of validity and values in psychological assessment. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 3-20). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
24.
Oakland, T., & Hu, S. (1992). The top 10 tests used with children and youth worldwide. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 19, 99-120.
25.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel, L. G. (2002). Uses and misuses of the correlation coefficient. Research in the Schools, 9, 73-90.
26.
Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (Eds.). (2005). WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives. New York: Elsevier.
27.
Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., Weiss, L. G., & Rolfhus, E. (2005). The WISC-IV in the clinical assessment context. In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 3-32). New York: Elsevier.
28.
Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53-61.
29.
Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Tataryn, D. J., Wood, J. M., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1999). Setting the value of k in promax: A Monte Carlo study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 384-391.
31.
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
32.
Velicer, W. F., Eaton, C. A., & Fava, J. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-71). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
33.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
34.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
35.
Wechsler, D. (2003a). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
36.
Wechsler, D. (2003b). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
37.
Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2000). Analysis and design for nonexperimental data. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 412-450). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., & Prifitera, A. (2005). Interpreting the WISC-IV index scores. In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 71-100). New York: Elsevier Academic.
39.
Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263-311.
40.
Williams, P. E., Weiss, L. G., & Rolfhus, E. L. (2003). Clinical validity (WISC-IV Technical Report No. 3). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
41.
Wood, J. M., Tataryn, D. J., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under-and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354-365.
