General self-efficacy (GSE), individuals'belief in their ability to perform well in a variety of situations, has been the subject of increasing research attention. However, the psychometric properties (e.g., reliability, validity) associated with the scores on GSE measures have been criticized, which has hindered efforts to further establish the construct of GSE. This study examines the reliability of responses to the items, as well as the item parameters of three GSE measures using item response theory. Contrary to the criticisms, the responses to the items on all three measures of GSE demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties, especially at lower levels of GSE. The results indicate that the New General Self-Efficacy Scale has a slight advantage over the other measures examined in this study in terms of the item discrimination, item information, and relative efficiency of the test information function. Implications for GSE research are discussed.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
2.
Bandura, A. (1984). Recycling misconceptions of perceived self-efficacy. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 8, 231-255.
3.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman & Co.
4.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99.
5.
Bosscher, R. J., & Smit, J. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 36, 339-343.
6.
Cervone, D. (1997). Social-cognitive mechanisms and personality coherence: Self-knowledge, situational beliefs, and cross-situational coherence in perceived self-efficacy. Psychological Science, 8, 43-50.
7.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83.
8.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 375-395.
9.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
Drasgow, F., & Lissak, R. (1983). Modified parallel analysis: A procedure for examining the latent dimensionalityof dichotomouslyscored item responses. Journalof AppliedPsychology, 68, 363-373.
11.
Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 143-165.
12.
Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983). Application of unidimensional item response theory models to mutidimensional data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 189-199.
13.
Eastman, C., & Marzillier, J. S. (1984). Theoretical and methodological difficulties in Bandura's self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 8, 213-229.
14.
Eden, D. (1988). Pygmalion, goal setting, and expectancy: Comparable ways to raise productivity. Academy of Management Review, 13, 639-652.
15.
Eden, D. (2001). Means efficacy: External sources of general and specific efficacy. In M. Erez & U. Kleinbeck (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 73-85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
20.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11, 167-187.
21.
Keller, T., & Dansereau, F. (2001).The effect of addingitems to scales: An illustrative case of LMX. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 131-143.
22.
Kirsch, I. (1985). Self-efficacy and expectancy: Old wine with new labels. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49, 824-830.
23.
Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 364-369.
24.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Lord, F. (1977). Practical applications of item characteristic curve theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 117-138.
26.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1985). Measurement and statistics: An examination of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 85-93.
27.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207-230.
29.
Robbins, S., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288.
30.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34, 1-100.
31.
Scholz, U., Gutiérrez Doza, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242-251.
32.
Schwarzer, R., & Born, A. (1997). Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in thirteen cultures. World Psychology, 3, 177-190.
33.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs(pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
34.
Sheldon, S. H. (1990). Developing the construct of general self-efficacy. Psychological Reports, 66, 987-994.
35.
Sherer, M., & Adams, C. (1983). Construct validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 53, 899-902.
36.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
37.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psy-chological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
38.
Stanley, K., & Murphy, M. (1997). A comparison of general self-efficacy with self-esteem. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 123, 81-99.
39.
Thissen, D., Chen, W., & Bock, R. (2003). MULTILOG user's guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
40.
Vancouver, J. B. (2005). The depth of history and explanation as benefit and bane for psychological control theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 38-52.
41.
Woodruff, S. L., & Cashman, J. F. (1993). Task, domain, and general self-efficacy: A reexamination of the Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 72, 423-432.
42.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.
