There has been growing interest in comparing achievement goal orientations across ethnic groups. Such comparisons, however, cannot be made until validity evidence has been collected to support the use of an achievement goal orientation instrument for that purpose. Therefore, this study investigates the measurement invariance of a particular measure of achievement goal orientation, the modified Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ-M), across African American and White university students. Confirmatory factor analyses support measurement invariance across the two groups. These findings provide additional validity evidence for the newly conceptualized 2 × 2 framework of achievement goal orientation and for the equivalence of functioning of the AGQ-M across these distinct groups. Because this level of invariance is established, researchers can make more valid inferences about differences in the AGQ-M scores across African American and White students.
Britner, S.L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 269-283.
2.
Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Chan, D. (2000). Detection of differential item functioning on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory using multiple-group mean and covariance structure analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 169-199.
4.
Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1-27.
Conroy, D.E., & Elliot, A.J. (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: Addressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 17, 271-285.
7.
DeCarlo, L. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292-307.
Dweck, C.S., & Bempechat, J. (1983). Children's theories of intelligence: Consequences for learning. In S. G. Paris, G. M. Olson, & H. W. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 239-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
11.
Elliot, A.J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
12.
Elliot, A.J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct . In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York: Guilford .
13.
Elliot, A.J., & Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
14.
Elliot, A.J., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
15.
Elliot, A.J., & McGregor, H.A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
16.
Elliot, A.J., McGregor, H.A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
17.
Elliot, A.J., McGregor, H.A., & Thrash, T.M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 361-387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
18.
Elliot, A.J., & Reis, H. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 317-331.
19.
Elliot, E.S. & Dweck, C.S. (1988). Motivational processes affecting learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
20.
Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517-531.
21.
Finney, S.J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
22.
Finney, S.J., Pieper, S.L., & Barron, K.E. (2004). Examining the psychometric properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a general academic context. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 365-382.
23.
Freeman, K.E., Gutman, L.M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Can achievement goal theory enhance our understanding of motivation and performance of African American students? In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 175-204). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Graham, S., & Hudley, C. (2005). Race and ethnicity in the study of motivation and competence. In A. J. Elliott & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 392-412). New York: Guilford.
25.
Green, S.B., & Thompson, M.S. (2006). Structural equation modeling for conducting tests of differences in multiple means. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 706-717.
26.
Hancock, G.R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 91-105.
27.
Henson, R.K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
28.
Hong, S., Malik, M.L., & Lee, M. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-Western sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 636-654.
29.
Horn, J.L., & McArdle, J.J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research , 18, 117-144.
30.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
31.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
32.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
33.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
34.
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M.L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330-358.
35.
Kaplan, A., Middleton, M.J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structure. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 175-204). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Karabenick, S.A. (2003). Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 37-58.
37.
Karabenick, S.A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569-581.
38.
Little, T.D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysis of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
39.
Marsh, H.W. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling , 1, 5-34.
40.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
41.
Mickelson, R.A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among Black adolescents . Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61.
42.
Middleton, M.J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
43.
Midgley, C., Arunkumar, R., & Urdan, T.C. (1996). ``If I don't do well tomorrow, there's a reason'': Predictors of adolescents' use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 423-434.
44.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M.L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L.H., et al. (1998). Development and validation of scales assessing student's achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131.
45.
Morgan, S.L., & Mehta, J.D. (2004). Beyond the laboratory: Evaluating the survey evidence for the disidentification explanation for Black-White differences in achievement . Sociology of Education, 77, 82-101.
46.
Orr, A.J. (2003). Black-White differences in achievement: The importance of wealth. Sociology of Education, 76, 281-304.
47.
Pintrich, P.R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
48.
Steenkamp, J., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research , 25, 78-90.
49.
Thompson, B., & Daniel, L.G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
50.
Thompson, M.S., & Green, S.B. (2006). Evaluating between-group differences in latent variable means. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 119-169). Information Age: Greenwich, CT.
51.
Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69.
52.
Van Yperen, N.W. (2003). Task interest and actual performance: The moderating effects of assigned and adopted purpose goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1006-1015.
53.
Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle , & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-325). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54.
Yin, P., & Fan, X. (2003). Assessing the factor structure invariance of self-concept measurement across ethnic and gender groups: Findings from a national sample . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 296-318.
55.
Yoo, B. (2002). Cross-group comparisons: A cautionary note. Psychology and Marketing, 19, 357-368.
