The current study evaluates the measurement precision of the Abridged Big Five Circumplex (AB5C) of personality traits by identifying those items that demonstrate differential item functioning by gender and ethnicity. Differential item functioning is found in 33 of 45 (73%) of the AB5C scales, across gender and ethnic groups (Caucasian vs. African American). More differential item functioning is found by ethnic groups compared with gender groups. The amount of differential item functioning found in these personality measures suggests the need to consider differential item functioning in the construction of measures. The authors encourage those using the AB5C measure to discard or reword these problematic items.
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322.
2.
Baker, F.B. (1995). Equate 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory [Computer software]. Madison : University of Wisconsin, Laboratory of Experimental Design.
3.
Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
4.
Bono, J.E., & Judge, T.A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology , 89, 901-910.
5.
Boyd-Franklin, N. (1989). Five key factors in the treatment of black families . Journal of Psychotherapy & the Family, 6, 53-69.
6.
Church, A., & Katigbak, M. (1989). Internal, external, and self-report structure of personality in a non-western culture: Investigation of cross-language and cross-cultural generalizability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 857-872.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Collins, J., & Gleaves, D. (1998). Race, job applicants, and the five-factor model of personality: Implications for black psychology, industrial/organizational psychology, and the five-factor theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 531-544.
9.
Condry, J., & Condry, S. (1976). Sex differences: A study of the eye of the beholder . Child Development, 47, 812-819.
10.
De Fruyt, F., & Furnham, A. (2000). Advances in the assessment of the Five-Factor Model. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 51-75.
11.
De Raad, B., & Doddema-Winsemius, M. (1999). Instincts and personality . Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 293-305.
12.
Demo, D.H., & Hughes, M. (1990). Socialization and racial identity among black Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 364-367.
13.
Drasgow, F., & Hulin, C.L. (1990). Item response theory. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial & organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 577-636). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
14.
Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Else-Quest, N.M., Hyde, J.S., Goldsmith, H.H., & Van Hulle, C.A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33-72.
16.
Embretson, S.E., & Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517-531.
18.
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
19.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
20.
Forehand, R., & Kotchick, B.A. (1996). Cultural diversity: A wake-up call for parent training. Behavior Therapy, 27, 187-206.
21.
Gaines, S. (1995). Relationships between members of cultural minorities . In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track. Understanding relationship processes series (pp. 51-88). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Gandy, O.H. (1993). African-Americans and privacy: Understanding the black perspective in the emerging policy debate. Journal of Black Studies, 24, 178-195.
23.
Gurtman, M.B. (1997). Studying personality traits: The circular way . In R. Plutchik & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 81-102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
Heesacker, M., Wester, S., Vogel, D., Wentzel, J., Mejia-Milan, C., & Goodholm, C. (1999). Gender-based emotional stereotyping. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 483-495.
25.
Henson, R.K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
26.
Hofstee, W.K., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L.R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
27.
Hofstee, W.K.B. (1994). The Abridged Big Five Circumplex (AB5C) model of trait structure: Comparisons with Heymans' cube, Kiesler's interpersonal circle, and Peabody and Goldberg's double cone model. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 27-33.
28.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1992). Hogan Personality Inventory manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
29.
Houston, L.N. (1990). Psychological principles and the black experience . Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
30.
Hurtz, G.M., & Donovan, J.J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
31.
International Personality Item Pool. (2001 ). A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Retrieved August 15, 2003, from http://ipip.ori.org
32.
Johnson, J.A. (1994). Clarification of Factor Five with the help of the AB5C model. European Journal of Personality, 8, 311-334.
33.
Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M.W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765-780.
34.
Keltner, D. (1995). Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 441-454.
35.
Lance, C.E., Butts, M.M., & Michels, L.C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods , 9, 202-220.
36.
Lombardo, W.K., Cretser, G.A., & Roesch, S.C. (2001). For crying out loud: The differences persist into the 90's. Sex Roles, 45, 529-547.
37.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Plant, E.A., Hyde, J.S., Keltner, D., & Devine, P.G. (2000). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 81-92.
39.
Raju, N. (2000). Notes accompanying the differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) [Computer software].
40.
Raju, N.S., Laffitte, L.J., & Byrne, B.M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 517-529.
41.
Raju, N.S., van der Linden, W.J., & Fleer, P.F. (1995). IRT-based internal measures of differential functioning of items and tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 353-368.
42.
Reckase, M.D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics , 4, 207-230.
43.
Reise, S.P., Smith, L., & Furr, R.M. (2001). Invariance on the NEO PI-R neuroticism scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 83-110.
44.
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement , 34, 100-114.
45.
Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
46.
Sheppard, R., Han, K., Colarelli, S.M., Dai, G., & King, D.W. (2006). Differential item functioning by sex and race in the Hogan Personality Inventory. Assessment, 13, 442-453.
47.
Smith, L.L. (2002). On the usefulness of item bias analysis to personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 754-763.
48.
Stocking, M.L., & Lord, F.M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory . Psychological Bulletin, 99, 118-128.
49.
Thissen, D. (2003). Multilog: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory (Version 7.03) [Computer software] . Chicago: Scientific Software.
50.
Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 118-128.
51.
Thomas, A.J. (2000). Impact of racial identity on African-American child-rearing beliefs. Journal of Black Psychology, 26, 317-329.
