The purpose of this study was to investigate the application of the parallel analysis (PA) method for choosing the number of factors in component analysis for situations in which data are dichotomous or ordinal. Although polychoric correlations are sometimes used as input for component analyses, the random data matrices generated for use in PA typically consist of Pearson correlations. In this study, the authors matched the type of random data matrix to the type of input matrix. Analyses were conducted on both polychoric and Pearson correlation matrices, and random matrices of the same type (polychoric or Pearson) were generated for the PA procedure. PA based on random Pearson correlations was found to perform at least as well as PA based on random polychoric correlations, for nearly all of the conditions studied.
Babakus, E., Ferguson, C.E., & Jöreskog, K.G. (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 222-228.
2.
Bandalos, D.L., & Finney, S.J. (in press). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Quantitative methods in the social and behavioral sciences: A guide for researchers and reviewers. Mahwah , NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Bollen, K.A., & Barb, K.H. ( 1981). Pearson’s r and coarsely categorized data . American Sociological Review, 46, 232-239.
4.
Buja, A., & Eyuboglu, N. ( 1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 509-540.
5.
Cattel, R.B. ( 1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
6.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Dolan, C.V. ( 1994). Factor analysis of variables with 2, 3, 5, and 7 response categories: A comparison of categorical data variable estimators using simulated data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 37, 309-326.
8.
Glorfeld, L.W. ( 1995). An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 377-393.
Henry, D. ( 2001). Classroom context and the development of aggression: The role of normative processes. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research, Volume IV (pp. 193-213). Hunting-ton, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
11.
Horn, J.L. ( 1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32, 179-185.
12.
Hubbard, R., & Allen, S.J. ( 1987). An empirical comparison of alternative methods for principal component extraction. Journal of Business Research , 15, 173-190.
13.
Humphreys, L.G., & Montanelli, R.G. (1975). An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 193-206.
14.
Kaiser, H.F. ( 1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
15.
MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. ( 1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
16.
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers: User’s guide. Los Angeles: Author.
17.
O’Connor, B.P. ( 2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396-402.
18.
Olsson, U. ( 1979a). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443-460.
19.
Olsson, U. ( 1979b). On the robustness of factor analysis against crude classification of the observations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 485-500.
20.
Pearson, K., & Pearson, E.S. ( 1922). On polychoric coefficients of correlation. Biometrika, 14, 127-156.
21.
Rigdon, E.E., & Ferguson, C.E. (1991). The performance of the polychoric correlation coefficient and selected fitting functions in confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Journal of Marketing Research , 28, 491-497.
22.
Velicer, W.F. ( 1976). Determining the number of factors from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
23.
Velicer, W.F., Eaton, C.A., & Fava, J.L. ( 2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-72). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
24.
Weng, L.-J., & Cheng, C.-P. ( 2005). Parallel analysis with unidimensional binary data . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 791-810.
25.
Zwick, W.R., & Velicer, W.F. ( 1986). Factor influencing five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin , 99, 432-442.
