Beta-Binomial Model for Count Data: An Application in Estimating Model-Based Oral Reading Fluency

Abstract

In this article, the beta-binomial model for count data is proposed and demonstrated in terms of its application in the context of oral reading fluency (ORF) assessment, where the number of words read correctly (WRC) is of interest. Existing studies adopted the binomial model for count data in similar assessment scenarios. The beta-binomial model, however, takes into account extra variability in count data that have been neglected by the binomial model. Therefore, it accommodates potential overdispersion in count data compared to the binomial model. To estimate model-based ORF scores, WRC and response times were jointly modeled. The full Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method was adopted for model parameter estimation. A simulation study showed adequate parameter recovery of the beta-binomial model and evaluated the performance of model fit indices in selecting the true data-generating models. Further, an empirical analysis illustrated the application of the proposed model using a dataset from a computerized ORF assessment. The obtained findings were consistent with the simulation study and demonstrated the utility of adopting the beta-binomial model for count-type item responses from assessment data.

Keywords

response time oral reading fluency bounded count data overdispersion Markov chain Monte Carlo

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brooks

S. P.

Gelman

(1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7(4), 434–455.

Forthmann

Gühne

Doebler

(2020). Revisiting dispersion in count data item response theory models: The Conway–Maxwell–Poisson counts model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 73, 32–50.

Fox

J.-P.

Marianti

(2016). Joint modeling of ability and differential speed using responses and response times. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(4), 540–553.

Gelfand

A. E.

Smith

A. F.

(1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410), 398–409.

Gelman

Meng

X.-L.

Stern

(1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica, 6, 733–760.

Hasbrouck

Tindal

(2017). An update to compiled ORF norms (Technical Report No. 1702) (Tech. Rep.). Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon.

Hung

L.-F.

(2012). A negative binomial regression model for accuracy tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(2), 88–103.

Jansen

M. G.

(1995). The Rasch Poisson counts model for incomplete data: An application of the EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(3), 291–302.

Jansen

M. G.

(1997). Rasch’s model for reading speed with manifest explanatory variables. Psychometrika, 62(3), 393–409.

10.

Kara

Kamata

Potgieter

Nese

J. F.

(2020). Estimating model-based oral reading fluency: A Bayesian approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(5), 847–869.

11.

Kara

Kamata

Qiao

Potgieter

C. J.

Nese

J. F.

(2024). Equating oral reading fluency scores: A model-based approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 84(1), 190–209.

12.

Liu

Shi

Jiang

(2022). Poisson diagnostic classification models: A framework and an exploratory example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(3), 506–516.

13.

Man

Harring

J. R.

(2019). Negative binomial models for visual fixation counts on test items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(4), 617–635.

14.

Man

Harring

J. R.

Zhan

(2022). Bridging models of biometric and psychometric assessment: A three-way joint modeling approach of item responses, response times, and gaze fixation counts. Applied Psychological Measurement, 46(5), 361–381.

15.

Marianti

Fox

J.-P.

Avetisyan

Veldkamp

B. P.

Tijmstra

(2014). Testing for aberrant behavior in response time modeling. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39(6), 426–451.

16.

Masters

G. N.

Wright

B. D.

(1984). The essential process in a family of measurement models. Psychometrika, 49(4), 529–544.

17.

Meng

X.-L.

(1994). Posterior predictive p-values. The Annals of Statistics, 22(3), 1142–1160.

18.

Molenaar

Tuerlinckx

van der Maas

H. L.

(2015). A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 68(2), 197–219.

19.

Plummer

(2015). Jags version 4.0. 0 user manual. Lyon, France.

20.

Potgieter

C. J.

Kamata

Kara

(2017). An EM algorithm for estimating an oral reading speed and accuracy model. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1705.10446.

21.

Qiao

Jiao

(2021). Explanatory cognitive diagnostic modeling incorporating response times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 58(4), 564–585.

22.

Qiao

Jiao

(2023). Multiple-group joint modeling of item responses, response times, and action counts with the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson distribution. Journal of Educational Measurement, 60(2), 255–281.

23.

Qiao

Potgieter

(2025). A quasi-poisson item response theory model for heterogeneous dispersion in count data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.

24.

Rasch

(1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Denmarks Paedagogiske Institut.

25.

Rasch

(1972). Objektivitet i samfundsvidenskaberne et metodeproblem [Objectivity in social sciences: A methodological problem]. Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift, 110, 161–196.

26.

Rubin

D. B.

(1984). Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. The Annals of Statistics, 12(4), 1151–1172.

27.

Spiegelhalter

D. J.

Best

N. G.

Carlin

B. P.

Van Der Linde

(2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(4), 583–639.

28.

Spray

J. A.

(1990). One-parameter item response theory models for psychomotor tests involving repeated, independent attempts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61(2), 162–168.

29.

van der Linden

W. J

. (2006). A lognormal model for response times on test items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(2), 181–204.

30.

van der Linden

W. J

. (2007). A hierarchical framework for modeling speed and accuracy on test items. Psychometrika, 72(3), 287–308.

31.

van der Linden

W. J.

Glas

C. A

. (2010). Statistical tests of conditional independence between responses and/or response times on test items. Psychometrika, 75(1), 120–139.

32.

Zhan

Man

Wind

S. A.

Malone

(2022). Cognitive diagnosis modeling incorporating response times and fixation counts: Providing comprehensive feedback and accurate diagnosis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 47(6), 736–776.

33.

Zitzmann

Hecht

(2019). Going beyond convergence in Bayesian estimation: Why precision matters too and how to assess it. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(4), 646–661.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.83 MB