The Optimal Number of Alternatives in Multiple-Choice Achievement Tests: Some Empirical Evidence for a Mathematical Proof

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green, 1956.

Ebel, R. L. Expected reliabilities as a function of choices per item. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1969, 29, 565-570.

Ebel, R. L. Measuring educational achievement . Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall , 1965.

Ebel, R. L. and Williams, B. G. The effect of varying the number of alternatives per item on multiple-choice vocabulary test items. The 14th Yearbook of the National Council on Measurements Used in Education . East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University, 1957, pp. 63-65.

Findley, W. G. A rationale for the evaluation of item discrimination statistics. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1956, 16, 175-180.

Johnson, A. P. Notes on a suggested index of item validity: The U-L index. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1951, 42, 499-504.

Pressey, S. L. Basic unresolved teaching-machine problems. Theory into practice, 1962, 1, 30-37.

Smith, K. An investigation of the uses of "double choice" items in testing achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 1958, 51, 387-389.

Tversky, A. On the optimal number of alternatives at a choice point. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1964, 1, 386-391.

Zimmerman, W. S. and Humphreys, L. G. Item reliability as a function of the omission of misleads. American Psychologist, 1953, 8, 460-461.