A Note on Comparing r-Biserial and r-Point Biserial

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, J. F. The effect of non-normally distributed criterion scores on item analysis techniques. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 , 317-320 .

Aleamoni, L. M. and Spencer, R. E. A comparison of biserial discrimination, point biserial discrimination and difficulty indices in item analysis data. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1969,29,353- 358 .

Brogden, H. E. On the interpretation of the correlation coefficient as a measure of predictive efficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1946, 37 , 65-76.

Clemans, W. V. An index of item-criterion relationship. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1958, 18, 167 -172.

Engelhart, M. D. A comparison of several item discriminative indices. Journal o f Educational Measurement , 1965, 2, 69-70.

Glass, G. V. Note on rank biserial correlation . EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT , 1966, 26, 623 -631.

Richardson, M. V. The relation of difficulty to the differential validity of a test. Psychometrika, 1936,1,33 -49.

Stanley, J. C. An important similarity between biserial r and the Brogden-Cureton-Glass biserial r for ranks. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1968, 28, 249-253 .