A Procedure for Predicting Underachievement in Mathematics Among Female College Students

Abstract

This study was designed to identify those females who are predicted to fall substantially below their male counterparts in mathematical participation and performance (female potential underachievers) and who are most in need of intervention procedures early in their college career. The subjects were 457 college graduates. A battery of high school variables was used to predict the students' college experience as measured by two separate variables: (a) the number of college mathematics courses (participation) and (b) the mathematics grade point average with each course weighted by its difficulty (performance). If the levels of mathematical performance of females and males with the same high school background were equal, one would expect the difference in their predicted performance to be close to zero. However, significant differences between the sexes were observed in their regression equations of prediction. Therefore, the differences between the male and female equations of prediction can be considered the vehicles for identifying female potential underachieves. Should colleges institute intervention procedures, this study provides an objective measure of their success.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alper

T. G.

The relationship between role orientation and achievement motivation in college women. In Denmark

F. L.

(ed.), Women (Vol. 1). New York: Psychological Dimensions, 1976, 99–121.

Carey

G. L.

Sex differences in problem solving performance as a function of attitude differences. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 256–260.

Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. Opportunities for women in higher education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973.

Connor

J. M.

Serbin

L. A.

Schackman

Sex differences in children's response to training on a visual-spatial test. Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 293–295.

Dixon

W. J.

Brown

M. B.

Biomedical Computer Programs. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979, 380–392.

Educational Testing Service. College Board Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton, N. J.: Author, 1948–1980.

Ernest

Mathematics and sex. American Mathematical Monthly. 1976, 83, 595–613.

Farver

A. S.

Sedlacek

W. E.

Brooks

G. C.

Longitudinal predictions of university grades for blacks and whites. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1975, 7, 243–250.

Larson

J. R.

Scontrino

The consistency of high school grade-point average and of the verbal and mathematical portions of the scholastic aptitude test of the College Entrance Examination Board, as predictors of college performance: An eight-year study. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 1976, 36, 439–443.

10.

Sawyer

R. L.

Maxey

The validity of college grade prediction equations over time. Paper presented at the Southern Association for Institutional Research, Nashville, Tennessee: October 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 165 547).

11.

Scott

E. L.

Higher education salary evaluation kit. Washington, D. C.: American Association of University Professors, 1976.

12.

Sherman

Fennema

The study of mathematics by high school girls and boys: Related variables. American Educational Research Journal, 1977, 14, 51–71.

13.

Tobias

Overcoming math anxiety. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.