Acceptability and Reliability of Sensitive Information Collected via Computer Interview

Abstract

The current study examined response bias in 108 female adolescents randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) interactive computer interview, (2) face-to-face interview, or (3) self-administered questionnaire. Subjects interviewed by computer enjoyed the survey more than subjects in other groups; subjects completing questionnaires gave the least positive evaluations (p < .001). Results showed no significant differences between subjects in the three groups on reports of sexual behavior, substance use or symptomatology. Reporting of affective states differed by groups (p < .001); subjects in the computer group were more willing to acknowledge having positive affect than subjects in other groups. Current interest in the use of computers in clinical settings must be supported by controlled investigations of the validity of computer acquired information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cannell, C. F. , Fisher, G. , and Bakker, T. (1965). Reporting of hospitalization in the Health Interview Survey. (National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 6). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Cannell, C. F. , Marquis, K. H. , and Laurent, A. (1977). A summary of studies of interviewing methodology. (National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 69). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Evan, W. M. and Miller, J. R. (1969). Differential effects on response bias of computer versus conventional administration of a social science questionnaire: An exploratory study. Behavioral Science, 14, 216-227.

Greist, J. H. , Klein, M. H. , Van Cura, L. J. , and Erdman, H. P. (1975). Computer interview questionnaires for drug use/abuse. In Predicting adolescent drug use: A review of issues, methods and correlates, National Institute of Drug Abuse, (DHEW Publication No. ADM 76-299).

Greist, J. H. and Klein, M. H. (1980). Computer Programs for Patients, Clinicians, and Researchers in Psychiatry. In J. B. Sidowski , J. H. Johnson and T. W. Williams (Eds.), Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems, Norwood, N J: Ablex Publishing Corp.

Grossman, J. H. , Barnett, G. O. , McGuire, M. T. , and Swedlow, D. B. (1971). Evaluation of computer acquired patient histories. Journal of the American Medical Association, 215, 1286-1291.

Jordon, L. A. , Marcus, A. C. , and Reeder, L. G. (1980). Response styles in telephone and household interviewing: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 210-222.

Kosen, D. , Kitchen, C. , Kochen, M. , and Stodolosky, D. (1970). Psychological testing by computer: Effect on response bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 803-810.

10.

Locander, W. S. , Sudman, S. , and Bradburn, N. M. (1976). An investigation of interview method, threat and response. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 269-275.

11.

Lucas, R. W. , Mullin, P. J. , Luna, C. B. , and Mclnroy, D. C. (1977). Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol-related illnesses: A comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 160-167.

12.

Rezmovic, V. (1977). The effects of computerized experimentation on response variance. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9, 144-147.

13.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press.

14.

Skinner, H. A. and Allen, B. A. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 267-275.

15.

Spielberger, C. D. , Gorsuch, R. L. , and Lushene, R. E. (1970). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Test Manual, Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.

16.

Stout, R. L. (1981). New approaches to the design of computerized interviewing and testing situations. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 436-442.