A Comparative Test of the Interval-Scale Properties of Magnitude Estimation and Case III Scaling and Recommendations for Equal-Interval Frequency Response Anchors
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 1989
A Comparative Test of the Interval-Scale Properties of Magnitude Estimation and Case III Scaling and Recommendations for Equal-Interval Frequency Response Anchors
This study investigated three sources of differences between recommended sets of equal-interval response anchors derived from two scaling techniques. One set, produced by magnitude estimations, is compared with a set produced by Thurstone Case III pair-comparison treatment of complete ranks. Subjects from two universities (N = 95, N = 110) completed magnitude estimations and rankings of 20 frequency expressions. Divergences in the results between the two methods were apparently due to differences between the samples as well as to the tasks and computational algorithms employed in the two approaches. Consensus anchor labels are identified and modifications in the magnitude estimation technique are recommended to improve its usefulness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bass, B. M. , Cascio, W. J., and O'Connor, E. J. (1974). Magnitude estimation of expressions of frequency and amount. Journal of Applied Psychology, 34, 313-320.
3.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
Clogg, C. C. and Goodman, L. A. (1986). On scaling models applied to data from several groups. Psychometrika, 51, 123-135.
5.
Coombs, C. H. , Dawes, R. M., and Tversky, A. (1970). Mathematical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
Duncan, O. D. (1984). Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9.
Lodge, M. (1981). Magnitude scaling: Quantitative measurement of opinions. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
Marks, L. E. (1974). Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Marks, L. E. (1982). Psychophysical measurement: Procedures, tasks, scales. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psycho-physical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
McNemar, Q. (1969). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
13.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Pohl, N. F. (1981). Scale considerations in using vague quantifiers. Journal of Experimental Education, 49, 235-240.
15.
Schriesheim, C. A. and Kerr, S. (1974). Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 756-765.
16.
Schriesheim, C. A. and Schriesheim, J. F. (1974). Development and empirical verification of new response categories to increase the validity of multiple response alternative questionnaires. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 34, 877-884.
17.
Schriesheim, C. A. and Schriesheim, J. F. (1978). The invariance of anchor points obtained by magnitude estimation and pair-comparison treatment of complete ranks scaling procedures: An empirical comparison and implications for validity of measurement. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 38, 977-983.
18.
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.
20.
Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181.
21.
Stevens, S. S. (1972). Psychophysics and social scaling. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
22.
Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: Wiley-Inter-science.
23.
Suppes, P. and Zinnes, J. L. (1963). Basic measurement theory. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.), Mathematical psychology, vol. 1. New York: Wiley.
24.
Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 23, 529-544.
25.
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). The measurement of social attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 249-269.
26.
Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
27.
Wegener, B. (1982). Fitting category to magnitude scales for a dozen survey-assessed attitudes. In B. Wegener (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
Westermann, R. (1983). Interval-scale measurement of attitudes: Some theoretical conditions and empirical testing methods. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 36, 228-239.
29.
Wherry, R. J. and Schriesheim, C. A. (1975). Interval scaling using pair comparisons or pair-comparison treatment of complete ranks under case III assumptions. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 35, 189-190.
