Lehman, R. S. (1977). Computer simulation and modeling: an introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Messick, S. A. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council of Education, Macmillan.
3.
Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
4.
Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
5.
Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
6.
Velleman, P. and Wilkinson, L. (in press). Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading. American Statistician.
7.
Wilcox, R. R. (1990). Comparing variances and means when distributions have nonidentical shapes. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 19, 155-173.
8.
Zimmerman, D. W. , Williams, R. H., Zumbo, B. D. (in press). Reliability of measurement and power of significance tests based on differences. Applied Psychological Measurement.
9.
Zimmerman, D. W. and Zumbo, B. D. (in press). Relative power of parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. In G. Keren and C. Lewis (Eds.), Methodological and quantitative issues in the analysis of psychological data. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Zumbo, B. D. and Zimmerman, D. W. (1991). Levels of measurement and the relation between parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. Working paper 91-1 of the Edumetrics Research Group, University of Ottawa. Manuscript under review.
11.
Zumbo, B. D. and Zimmerman, D. W. (in press-a). Alternatives to classical statistical procedures. Canadian Psychology.
12.
Zumbo, B. D. and Zimmerman, D. W. (in press-b). Are the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement?Canadian Psychology.
