The Metric Equivalence of the Ucla Loneliness Scale for a Sample of South African Students

Abstract

This article reports on the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale employed with a sample of South African students. Respondents consisted of 659 undergraduate students (39.4% males, 60.6% females) at the University of Western Cape, South Africa. The mean loneliness score for this group was slightly higher than those reported for North American college students, and slightly lower than those reported for Puerto Rican and Iranian students. This finding is consistent with previously reported cross- cultural variability in the experience of loneliness. Size of house- hold was significantly related to loneliness score which would suggest that the family plays a role in the experience of loneliness. The scale demonstrated adequate reliability (coefficient alpha = .81) and factor analysis confirmed the unidimensionality of the scale for this sample. Tests for sex differences indicated that males reported more loneliness than females which are also consistent with previous studies. The obtained results underline the utility of the UCLA Loneliness Scale for use with South African students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrera, M. , Sandler, I. N. , and Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435-447.

Berg, J. H. and Peplau, L. A. (1982). Loneliness: The relationship of self-disclosure and adrogyny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 624-630.

Berry, J. W. and Triandis, H. C. (Eds.). (1980). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol 2. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Diamant, L. and Windholtz, G. (1981). Loneliness in college students: Some therapeutic considerations. Journal of College Student Personnel, 22, 515-522.

Hojat, M. (1982). Psychometric characteristics of the UCLA Lone-liness Scale: A study with Iranian college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 917-925.

Jones, W. H. , Carpenter, B. N. , and Quintana, D. (1985). Personality and interpersonal predictors of loneliness in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1503-1511.

Peplau, L. A. and Perlman, D. (1979). Blueprint for a social psychological theory of loneliness. In M. Cook and G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction (pp. 101-110). Oxford: Pergamon.

Peplau, L. A. and Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau and D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1-18). New York: Wiley.

Petersen, A. C. and Kellam, S. G. (1977). Measurement of the psychological well-being of adolescents: The psychometric properties and assessment procedures of the How I Feel. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 229-247.

10.

Pretorius, T. B. (1990). Psychological research: Normative and comparative data on selected research instruments. Unpublished manuscript, University of Western Cape, Psychology Resource Center, South Africa.

11.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

12.

Russel, D. , Peplau, L. A. , and Cutrona, C. (1978). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying loneliness. Unpublished manuscript, University of California.

13.

Russel, D. , Peplau, L. A. , and Cutrona, C. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.

14.

Russel, D. , Peplau, L. A. , and Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290-294.

15.

Sadava, S. W. and Thompson, M. M. (1986). Loneliness, social drinking and vulnerability to alcohol problems. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 133-139.