Atitudes of Suburban High School Students Toward Behaviors Associated With High-Achieving Peers: Development and Validation of the Peer Assessment Scale

Abstract

The primary purpose of the present study was to investigate the acceptance of high school students (Grades 9-12) of the behavioral characteristics associated with high-ability peers. A secondary purpose was to develop an attitude instrument to assess this acceptance, the Peer Assessment Scale (PAS). The procedures used to develop the instrument and the results obtained from the pilot of the instrument in three Connecticut high schools are described. Factor analysis identified the two behavioral characteristics supported in the literature and identified by the judges in the content validity stage: (a) an Academic factor and (b) a Social/Emotional factor. Results indicated that females were significantly more accepting of the behaviors associated with Factors 1 and 2, as were students who reported themselves to be above average in scholastic ability. Although there were no significant differences among females of average and above average ability at each grade level with respect to the social and emotional behaviors associated with high-ability peers, above average males in Grades 10, 11, and 12 were significantly more accepting of the aforementioned behaviors than their above average counterparts in Grade 9.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achenbach, T. M. (1970). Standardization of a research instrument for identifying associative responding for children. Developmental Psychology, 2(2), 283-291.

Braham, M. (1965). Peer group deterrents to intellectual development during adolescence. Educational Theory, 15(3), 248-258.

Brown, B. B. (1990, November). School culture, social politics, and the academic motivation of U.S. students. Paper presented at a conference on student motivation sponsored by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Arlington, VA.

Clausen, D. R. , & Brown, B. B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peerpressure in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14(6), 451-468.

Colangelo, N. , & Kelly, K. R. (1983). A study of student, parent and teacher attitudes toward gifted programs and gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(3), 107-110.

Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press.

Davis, G. A. , & Rimm, S. B. (1989). Education of the gifted and talented (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ishiyama, F. I. , & Chabassol, D. J. (1985). Adolescents' fear of the social consequences of academic success as a function of age and sex. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14(1), 37-46.

Mitchell, J. 0. (1974). Attitudes of adolescents towards mental ability, academic effort and athleticism. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

10.

Morgan, H. (1981). Adolescent attitudes toward academic brilliance in the suburban high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.

11.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Reis, S. M. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(2), 83-88.

13.

Tannenbaum, A. J. (1961).Adolescent attitudes toward academic brilliance. New York: Teachers College Press.

14.

Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27-44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

15.

Webb, J. T. , Meckstroth, E. A. , & Tolan, S. S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child. Columbus: Ohio Psychology Publishing Company.